Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Task switching involves switch cost (poorer performance switch trials than in task-repetition trials) and mixing cost (poorer performance in task-repetition trials than in trials from blocks without task switching). These are mainly studied with the alternating runs task-switching (ARTS) paradigm (in which the task changes every constant number of trials) or the cued task-switching (CTS) paradigm, in which the tasks change randomly. The authors tested the hypothesis that dealing with actual or potential conflicts regarding which task is currently required contribute to mixing cost in CTS more than in ARTS and contribute to switch costs more in ARTS than in CTS. This hypothesis was tested using ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time (RT) distributions, in which the heaviness of the right tail marks task conflicts (Steinhauser and Hübner in J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 35:1398–1412 2009). As predicted, a heavier RT-distribution tail marked switch cost more strongly in ARTS than in CTS and marked mixing costs more strongly in CTS than in ARTS. These results indicate that switch cost and mixing cost reflect different processes in different task-switching paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, E. M. (2007). Comparing switch costs: alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, E. M. (2013). Fine-grain episodic memory processes in cognitive control. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andreadis, N., & Quinlan, P. T. (2010). Task switching under predictable and unpredictable circumstances. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1776–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, A., & Meiran, N. (2010). Task conflict effect in task switching. Psychological Research, 74, 568–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigation of task switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

  • Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: a PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1170–1176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, J. G., & Jarmasz, J. (2010). Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: the number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14(89), 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2010). The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated long-term memory hypothesis. Psychological Research, 74, 388–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., et al. (2010). Control and interference in task switching: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabet–arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacouture, Y., & Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (2010). Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. In R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Self control in society, mind and brain (pp. 202–220). NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., & Daichman, A. (2005). Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cueing task-switching paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1272–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Gotler, A., & Perlman, A. (2001). Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences B, 56, 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by Action Representation and Input Selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task Switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereg, M., Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2013). Task-switching training effects are mediated by working-memory management. Intelligence, 41, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477–1491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Suss, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, F., & Voss, A. (2012). Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 222–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1398–1412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tornay, F. J., & Milán, E. G. (2001). A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 785–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van ‘t Wout, F., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1538–1551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, T. S., Meier, B., Tipper, C., & Graf, P. (2003). Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding. Experimental Psychology, 50, 233–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Maayan Pereg for her help in designing the experiment, Miriam Gade and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. This research was supported by a research grant from the Israel Science Foundation to N. Meiran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel

    Nitzan Shahar & Nachshon Meiran

Authors
  1. Nitzan Shahar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nachshon Meiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nachshon Meiran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahar, N., Meiran, N. Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions. Psychological Research 79, 259–266 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation