Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a serial reaction time task, this study examines whether learning of auditory sequences is possible without a corresponding motor response, i.e., by listening alone. The dual sequence paradigm used by Mayr (in Journal of the Experimental Psychology: Learning memory and cognition 22:350–354, 1996, Experiment 1) was adapted to the auditory domain. Four different actors spoke the same four colour words. These were presented such that speaker identity followed one sequence, and the word spoken followed a different sequence. Subjects were asked to respond (with a key press) to one of these dimensions (identity or word), and ignore the other. Results showed learning for either type of stimulus, but only when it was responded to. No learning of either type of auditory sequence by listening alone was found. The results add evidence to visual implicit learning studies that have failed to find learning of event sequences when spatial or response selection was not an important factor in processing. The findings are discussed in the context of implicit learning as a general and fundamental cognitive process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchner, A. & Frensch, P.A. (1997). Sequence learning. Phenomena and models. Psychological Research, 60, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., Steffens, M.C., Erdfelder, E. & Rothkegel, R. (1997). A multinomial model to assess fluency and recollection in a sequence learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 631–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., Steffens, M.C. & Rothkegel, R. (1998). On the role of fragmentary knowledge in a sequence learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V. & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of Sequences of Tasks..Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4) , 967–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.H., Mutter, S.A. & Howard, D.V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5) , 109–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, L. & Mendez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1) , 236–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S.W. & Burton, A.M. (2001). Learning complex sequences by observation? Psychological Research, 65, 15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S.W., Burton, A.M., Riedel, B & Lynch, E. (2003). Sequence learning by observation: evidence for separate mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology, 94 (3), 355–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I. & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 863–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondor, T.A. & Bregman, A.S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions. Perception and Psychophysics, 56(3), 268–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor, T.A. & Zatorre, R.J. (1994). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(2), 387–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, B.R. & Bright, J.E.H. (2002). Well past midnight: calling time on implicit invariant learning? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M.J. & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P. & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 19, 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P., Bigand, E. & Benoit-Gonin, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 60, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 855–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: an essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. (1994). What manner of mind is this? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(3) , 418–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J.R., Johnson, E.K., Aslin, R.N. & Newport, E.L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, V & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, C.A. (1997). Two forms of sequential implicit learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 108–131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D.R. & Johnston, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6 ) , 1435–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D.B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory and Cognition, 27, 561–572.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D.B., Nissen, M.J., Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1047–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D.B., Wells, L.A., Farrell, J.M., Stemwedel, M.E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory and Cognition, 28(3) , 366–375.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mike Burton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riedel, B., Burton, A.M. Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences. Psychological Research 70, 337–344 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0226-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0226-9

Keywords

Navigation