Skip to main content
Log in

Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identification of the second of two targets presented in close succession is often impaired—a phenomenon referred to as the attentional blink. Extending earlier work (Di Lollo, Kawahara, Ghorashi, and Enns, in Psychological Research 69:191–200, 2005), the present study shows that increasing the number of targets in the stream can lead to remarkable improvements as long as there are no intervening distractors. In addition, items may even recover from an already induced blink whenever they are preceded by another target. It is shown that limited memory resources contribute to overall performance, but independent of the attentional blink. The findings argue against a limited-capacity account of the blink and suggest a strong role for attentional control processes that may be overzealously applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2005). Short-term memory and the attentional blink: Capacity versus content. Memory & Cognition, 33, 654–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brehaut, J. C., Enns, J. T., & diLollo, V. (1999). Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(7), 1436–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple detection in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Acqua, R., Pascali, A., Jolicoeur, P., Sessa, P. (2003). Four-dot masking produces the attentional blink. Vision Research, 43, 1907–1913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. Niedenthal, & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: EMotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S. M. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource limitation or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giesbrecht, B., & DiLollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1454–1466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandison, T. D., Ghirardelli, T. G., & Egeth, H. E. (1997). Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(2), 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 138–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Beatty, J., & Pollack, I. (1967). Perceptual deficit during a mental task. Science, 157, 218–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, J.-I., Zuvic, S. M., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2003). Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(3), 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, J., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2005). The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon. Psychological Research (in press).

  • Kessler, K., Schmitz, F., Gross, J., Hommel, B., Shapiro, K., & Schnitzler, A. (2005). Target consolidation under high temporal processing demands as revealed by MEG. NeuroImage, 26(4), 1030–1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, W. S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(4), 1014–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, W. S., Bussard, G., Lopez, K., & Digby, B. (2003). Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 188–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, S., Wolters, G., & Van Raamsdonk, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1275–1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Gilzenrat, M. S., Holmes, B. D., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: A neurocomputational theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., Lubbe, R. H. J. v. d., & Hooge, I. T. C. (2005). Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (in press).

  • Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005a). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16(4), 265–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005b). The beneficial effects of additional task load, visual distraction, and positive affect on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (in press).

  • Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 979–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O’Conner, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1149–1162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C., Dell’Acqua, R., Pesciarelli, F., Job, R., & Peressotti, F. (2005). Bidirectional semantic priming in the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 460–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert, A. E., & DiLollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(4), 1061–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language (pp. 151–188). San diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. M., & Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & DiLollo, V. (1999a). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, T. A. W., Zuvic, S. M., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999b). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 432–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1418–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian N. L. Olivers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olivers, C.N.L., van der Stigchel, S. & Hulleman, J. Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research 71, 126–139 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0029-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0029-z

Keywords

Navigation