Abstract.
Nicotiana tabacum L. wild-type plants and transformants (ΔndhCKJ), deficient in functional NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (NDH), were subjected to high light at 20 °C and 4 °C for 2 h to examine a possible role of NDH-mediated cyclic electron flow in protecting photosystems I and II from photoinhibition. Photochemical activity of photosystem I (PSI) was assessed by means of P700 absorbance changes at 810 nm. In addition, potential photosystem II (PSII) efficiency was determined by measuring the 'dark-adapted' ratio of variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence, F v/F m. Both photosystems were more susceptible to photoinhibition at 4 °C than at 20 °C. However, the degree of photoinhibition was not less in the wild type than in the NDH-deficient plants. To evaluate the efficiency of P700 oxidation in far-red light, a saturation constant, K s, was determined, representing the far-red irradiance at which half of the maximum P700 absorbance change was reached. In photoinhibited leaves, a decrease in the efficiency of P700 oxidation (increase in K s) was observed. The increase in K s was more pronounced at 4 °C than at 20 °C, but not significantly different between wild-type and ΔndhCKJ plants. Re-reduction kinetics of oxidised P700 in the dark were accelerated to a similar extent in photoinhibited samples of both genotypes and at the two temperatures tested. The data indicate that NDH-mediated cyclic electron flow does not protect PSI against short-term light stress. It is proposed that the observed increase in K s represents a protective mechanism that is based on accelerated charge recombination in PSI and facilitates thermal dissipation of excessive light energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barth, C., Krause, H.G. Study of tobacco transformants to assess the role of chloroplastic NAD(P)H dehydrogenase in photoprotection of photosystems I and II. Planta 216, 273–279 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0843-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0843-0