Skip to main content
Log in

Inverting the ALPPS paradigm by minimizing first stage impact: the Mini-ALPPS technique

  • How-I-Do-It Articles
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The current associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) approach is represented by an aggressive first surgical procedure followed by a shorter and less aggressive second procedure. This paradigm has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. Inverting the aggressiveness of the surgical stages might be beneficial in order to facilitate patient recovery during interval period. We propose a new technical paradigm for the ALPPS approach.

Methods

During the first stage, partial parenchymal transection combined with intraoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) was performed. Liver mobilization was kept at minimum while hilar plate or hilum dissection was strictly avoided. The completion surgery by means of the anterior approach was carried out once sufficient future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy and function were certified.

Results

We applied this technique in four patients (hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver = 1 and colorectal liver metastases = 3). The mean FLR hypertrophy was 62.6 % (range 49–79). All the four patients underwent the completion surgery with R0 margins, and neither one developed liver failure nor major complications.

Conclusions

The technique proposed inverts the current ALPPS strategy, minimizing the first stage impact to promote rapid patient recovery and leaving the main surgical procedure for the second stage. The combination of evidence-based facts such as partial parenchymal transection, intraoperative PVE, and “non-touch” oncological rules was feasible and safe, allowing complete tumor resection in highly selected candidates with extensive liver disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALPPS:

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy

FLR:

Future liver remnant

IPVE:

Intraoperative portal vein embolization

IOUS:

Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound

PPT:

Partial parenchymal transection

KGR:

Kinetic growth rate

PHLF:

Posthepatectomy liver failure

References

  1. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D et al (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling two-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Worldwide registry of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Data management system. www.alpps.net

  4. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K et al (2014) ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg 38:1510–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schadde E, Malagó M, Hernandez-Alejandro R et al (2015) Monosegment ALPPS hepatectomy: extending resectability by rapid hypertrophy. Surgery 157:676–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torres OJ, Fernandes Ede S, Oliveira CV et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): the Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26:40–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Truant S, Scatton O, Dokmak S et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): impact of the inter-stages course on morbi-mortality and implications for management. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:674–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schadde E, Schnitzbauer AA, Tschuor C et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3109–3120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Sanchez Claria R et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): tips and tricks. J Gastrointest Surg 17:814–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Santibañes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V (2012) How to avoid postoperative liver failure: a novel method. World J Surg 36(1):125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg 261:723–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donati M, Basile F, Oldhafer KJ (2015) Present status and future perspectives of ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy). Future Oncol 11:2255–2258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute. Available at http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html CTCAE v4.03 [minor update 2010]

  14. Paugam-Burtz C, Janny S, Delefosse D et al (2009) Prospective validation of the “fifty-fifty” criteria as an early and accurate predictor of death after liver resection in intensive care unit patients. Ann Surg 249:124–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Santibañes M, Alvarez FA, Santos FR et al (2014) The associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach using only segments I and IV as future liver remnant. J Am Coll Surg 219:e5–e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, Kantas A, Ittrich H et al (2014) Avoid “All-Touch” by hybrid ALPPS to achieve oncological efficacy. Ann Surg 263(1):e6–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R et al (2014) Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 260:829–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC (2012) Totally laparoscopic ALPPS is feasible and may be worthwhile. Ann Surg 256, e13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robles R, Parrilla P, López-Conesa A et al (2014) Tourniquet modification of the associating liver partition and portal ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure. Br J Surg 101:1129–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gall TM, Sodergren MH, Frampton AE et al (2015) Radio-frequency-assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation (RALPP) for liver regeneration. Ann Surg 261:e45–e46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gringeri E, Boetto R, D’Amico FE et al (2015) Laparoscopic microwave ablation and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (LAPS): a minimally invasive first-step approach. Ann Surg 261:e42–e43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaw CM, Madoff DC (2011) Acute thrombosis of left portal vein during right portal vein embolization extended to segment 4. Semin Interv Radiol 28(2):156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Nimura Y (2004) Portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis after portal vein embolization in a patient with protein S deficiency. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11(5):338–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aloia TA, Vauthey JN (2012) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): what is gained and what is lost? Ann Surg 256, e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Fanny Rodriguez Santos for perfectly translating the presented technique into a wonderful drawing.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have contributed in study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting, and critical revision of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo de Santibañes.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent for the procedure after being informed of the technique as well as its potential complications.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Source of funding

The funding involved in this work has been provided by our institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Santibañes, E., Alvarez, F.A., Ardiles, V. et al. Inverting the ALPPS paradigm by minimizing first stage impact: the Mini-ALPPS technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 557–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1424-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1424-1

Keywords

Navigation