Abstract
Purpose
The current associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) approach is represented by an aggressive first surgical procedure followed by a shorter and less aggressive second procedure. This paradigm has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. Inverting the aggressiveness of the surgical stages might be beneficial in order to facilitate patient recovery during interval period. We propose a new technical paradigm for the ALPPS approach.
Methods
During the first stage, partial parenchymal transection combined with intraoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) was performed. Liver mobilization was kept at minimum while hilar plate or hilum dissection was strictly avoided. The completion surgery by means of the anterior approach was carried out once sufficient future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy and function were certified.
Results
We applied this technique in four patients (hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver = 1 and colorectal liver metastases = 3). The mean FLR hypertrophy was 62.6 % (range 49–79). All the four patients underwent the completion surgery with R0 margins, and neither one developed liver failure nor major complications.
Conclusions
The technique proposed inverts the current ALPPS strategy, minimizing the first stage impact to promote rapid patient recovery and leaving the main surgical procedure for the second stage. The combination of evidence-based facts such as partial parenchymal transection, intraoperative PVE, and “non-touch” oncological rules was feasible and safe, allowing complete tumor resection in highly selected candidates with extensive liver disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ALPPS:
-
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
- FLR:
-
Future liver remnant
- IPVE:
-
Intraoperative portal vein embolization
- IOUS:
-
Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound
- PPT:
-
Partial parenchymal transection
- KGR:
-
Kinetic growth rate
- PHLF:
-
Posthepatectomy liver failure
References
Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D et al (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785
Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling two-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414
Worldwide registry of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Data management system. www.alpps.net
Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K et al (2014) ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg 38:1510–1519
Schadde E, Malagó M, Hernandez-Alejandro R et al (2015) Monosegment ALPPS hepatectomy: extending resectability by rapid hypertrophy. Surgery 157:676–689
Torres OJ, Fernandes Ede S, Oliveira CV et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): the Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26:40–43
Truant S, Scatton O, Dokmak S et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): impact of the inter-stages course on morbi-mortality and implications for management. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:674–682
Schadde E, Schnitzbauer AA, Tschuor C et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3109–3120
Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Sanchez Claria R et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): tips and tricks. J Gastrointest Surg 17:814–821
de Santibañes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V (2012) How to avoid postoperative liver failure: a novel method. World J Surg 36(1):125–128
Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg 261:723–732
Donati M, Basile F, Oldhafer KJ (2015) Present status and future perspectives of ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy). Future Oncol 11:2255–2258
Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute. Available at http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html CTCAE v4.03 [minor update 2010]
Paugam-Burtz C, Janny S, Delefosse D et al (2009) Prospective validation of the “fifty-fifty” criteria as an early and accurate predictor of death after liver resection in intensive care unit patients. Ann Surg 249:124–128
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724
de Santibañes M, Alvarez FA, Santos FR et al (2014) The associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach using only segments I and IV as future liver remnant. J Am Coll Surg 219:e5–e9
Li J, Kantas A, Ittrich H et al (2014) Avoid “All-Touch” by hybrid ALPPS to achieve oncological efficacy. Ann Surg 263(1):e6–e7
Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R et al (2014) Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 260:829–836
Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC (2012) Totally laparoscopic ALPPS is feasible and may be worthwhile. Ann Surg 256, e13
Robles R, Parrilla P, López-Conesa A et al (2014) Tourniquet modification of the associating liver partition and portal ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure. Br J Surg 101:1129–1134
Gall TM, Sodergren MH, Frampton AE et al (2015) Radio-frequency-assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation (RALPP) for liver regeneration. Ann Surg 261:e45–e46
Gringeri E, Boetto R, D’Amico FE et al (2015) Laparoscopic microwave ablation and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (LAPS): a minimally invasive first-step approach. Ann Surg 261:e42–e43
Shaw CM, Madoff DC (2011) Acute thrombosis of left portal vein during right portal vein embolization extended to segment 4. Semin Interv Radiol 28(2):156–161
Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Nimura Y (2004) Portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis after portal vein embolization in a patient with protein S deficiency. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11(5):338–341
Aloia TA, Vauthey JN (2012) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): what is gained and what is lost? Ann Surg 256, e9
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Fanny Rodriguez Santos for perfectly translating the presented technique into a wonderful drawing.
Authors’ contributions
All authors have contributed in study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting, and critical revision of manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent for the procedure after being informed of the technique as well as its potential complications.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Source of funding
The funding involved in this work has been provided by our institution.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Santibañes, E., Alvarez, F.A., Ardiles, V. et al. Inverting the ALPPS paradigm by minimizing first stage impact: the Mini-ALPPS technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 557–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1424-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1424-1