Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer—unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Several European countries are undertaking quality control projects in colorectal cancer. These efforts have led to improvements in survival, but a comparison between different projects reveals questionable results. The aim of this study is the presentation of results from hospitals in three different European countries participating in the International Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer (IQACC) project.

Methods

For this publication, patients with cancer of the colon or rectum treated in 2009 and 2010 and recorded in the IQACC (Germany, Poland and Italy) were analysed. The comparison included number of patients, age, preoperative diagnostics (CT of the abdomen and thorax, MRI, colonoscopy, ultrasound, tumour markers), surgical approach, metastasis, height of rectal cancer and histopathological examination of a specimen (T stage, N stage and MERCURY classification for rectum resection). For short-term outcomes, general complications, wound dehiscence, tumour-free status at discharge, anastomotic leakage and in-hospital mortality were analysed.

Results

A total of 12,691 patients (6,756 with colon cancer, 5,935 with rectal cancer) were included in the analysis. Preoperative diagnostics differed significantly between countries. For pT and pN stages, several quality differences could be demonstrated, including missing stages (colon cancer: pT 5.7–12.5 %, pN 2.5–11.0 %; rectal cancer: pT 1.1–5.6 %, pN 1.1–15.5 %). The most relevant differences for short-term outcomes in colon cancer were found in general complications (4.2–22.8 %) and tumour-free status at discharge (74.5–91.7 %). In-hospital deaths ranged between 2.5 and 4.3 % and did not show significant differences. For rectal cancer, the country with the highest percentage of tumours localised less than 4 cm from the anal verge (16.0 %) showed the lowest frequency of amputation (8.5 %). Outcome differences were found for general complications (3.2–18.8 %), anastomotic leakage (0–4.3 %) and tumour-free status at discharge (72.9–87.6 %). In-hospital deaths ranged between 1.1 and 3.2 %.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of an international quality assurance project in colorectal cancer. This concept ensures data analysis based on a comparable data input. Differences in preoperative diagnostics, completeness of histopathological evaluation and short-term outcomes for Germany, Poland and Italy might result from disparities in socioeconomic factors and implementation of existing guidelines. Further activities are necessary to warrant the use of common standards in outcome control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Marchesi F, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE Working Group (2009) EUROCARE–4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer 45:931–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R, Hackl M, Larsen IK, Lemmens V, Mangone L, Francisci S, EUROCARE Working Group (2012) Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: the EUROCARE Study. Int J Cancer 131:1649–1658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mroczkowski P, Hac S, Lippert H, Kube R (2011) Quality assurance in colorectal cancer in Europe AD 2011. Zentralbl Chir. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1283795

  4. Van Gijn W, van den Broek CB, Mroczkowski P, Dziki A, Romano G, Pavalkis D, Wouters MW, Møller B, Wibe A, Påhlman L, Harling H, Smith JJ, Penninckx F, Ortiz H, Valentini V, van de Velde CJ (2012) The EURECCA project: data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:467–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van-Gijn W, Velde CJ, members of the EURECCA consortium (2010) Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(Suppl 1):S23–S26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mroczkowski P, Ortiz H, Penninckx F, Påhlman L (2012) European quality assurance programme in rectal cancer—are we ready to launch? Colorectal Dis 14:960–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mroczkowski P, Kube R, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2010) Quality assessment of colorectal cancer care—an international online model. Colorectal Dis 13:890–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagtegaal ID, Velde CJ, Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologistin quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 6 R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dighe S, Swift I, Brown G (2008) CT staging of colon cancer. Clin Radiol 63:1372–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huh JW, Jeong YY, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2012) Prognostic value of preoperative radiological staging assessed by computed tomography in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. Ann Oncol 23:1198–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosmider S, Stella DL, Field K, Moore M, Ananda S, Oakman C, Singh M, Gibbs P (2009) Preoperative investigations for metastatic staging of colon and rectal cancer across multiple centres—what is current practice? Colorectal Dis 11:592–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van de Velde CJ, Aristei C, Boelens PG, Beets-Tan RG, Blomqvist L, Borras JM, van den Broek CB, Brown G, Coebergh JW, Cutsem EV, Espin E, Gore-Booth J, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Henning G, Iversen LH, Han van Krieken J, Marijnen CA, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Påhlman L, Quirke P, Rödel C, Roth A, Rutten HJ, Schmoll HJ, Smith J, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Gambacorta MA, Meldolesi E, Wiggers T, Cervantes A, Valentini V, European Registration of Cancer Care (2013) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer 49:2784–2790. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akasu T, Iinuma G, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N (2009) Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2787–2794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maizlin ZV, Brown JA, So G, Brown C, Phang TP, Walker ML, Kirby JM, Vora P, Tiwari P (2010) Can CT replace MRI in preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 53:308–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. OECD Health Data 2012 (2012) Frequently requested data. http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/oecdhealthdata2012-frequentlyrequesteddata.htm. Accessed 3 January 2013

  17. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Nordlinger B, van de Velde CJ, Balmana J, Regula J, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RG, Arnold D, Ciardiello F, Hoff P, Kerr D, Köhne CH, Labianca R, Price T, Scheithauer W, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Aderka D, Barroso S, Bodoky G, Douillard JY, El Ghazaly H, Gallardo J, Garin A, Glynne-Jones R, Jordan K, Meshcheryakov A, Papamichail D, Pfeiffer P, Souglakos I, Turhal S, Cervantes A (2012) ESMO consensus guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23:2479–2516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. German S3-Guideline (2013) Colorectal cancer. http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/021_007OLl_S3_KRK_14062013.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2013

  19. Pappalardo G, Nunziale A, Coiro S, Spoletini D, De Lucia F, Frattaroli FM (2010) Results of a national questionnaire on “treatment of the subperitoneal rectal cancer”. Comparision among the international guidelines and metaanalysis. Ann Ital Chir 81:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. AIOM Guideline (2003) Colorectal cancer. http://www.aiom.it/area+pubblica/area+medica/prodotti+scientifici/linee+guida/Tumori+del+colon-retto/1,1979,0. Accessed 18 January 2013

  21. Rekomendacje Konsultanta Krajowego W Chirurgii Onkologicznej stan na 1.3.2013 (2013) Rak jelita grubego. http://chirurgiaonkologiczna.org.pl/rekomendacje/rekomendacje-merytoryczne/rak-jelita-grubego. Accessed 8 December 2013

  22. Yeung JM, Ferris NJ, Lynch AC, Heriot AG (2009) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Future Oncol 5:1295–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P, European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H (2011) Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer—a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1227–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, Coebergh JW, Cervantes A, Blomqvist L, Beets-Tan RG, van den Broek CB, Brown G, Van Cutsem E, Espin E, Haustermans K, Glimelius B, Iversen LH, van Krieken JH, Marijnen CA, Henning G, Gore-Booth J, Meldolesi E, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Påhlman L, Quirke P, Rödel C, Roth A, Rutten H, Schmoll HJ, Smith JJ, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Wiggers T, Gambacorta MA, Aristei C, Valentini V (2014) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer 50:1.e1–1.e34. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The multilingual internet platform was supported by the following grants from the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF): NOE 11/056, MOE 10/R53 and MOE 07/R65.

Disclosures

Drs. Olof Jannasch, Andrej Udelnow, Giovanni Romano, Adam Dziki, Dainius Pavalkis, Hans Lippert and Pawel Mroczkowski have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Mroczkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jannasch, O., Udelnow, A., Romano, G. et al. International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer—unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399, 473–479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1176-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1176-8

Keywords

Navigation