Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for acute surgical abdominal intervention. In this study, we analyzed the gender correlation with demographic, epidemiologic, diurnal, and seasonal trends in relation to the incidence and management of patients with acute appendicitis in our medical center.

Methods

Data of patients, 18 years of age or older who underwent emergency appendectomies at the Rabin Medical Center during the last 13 years, were collected. The data collected included demographic parameters, hospitalization, procedures, and use of preoperative imaging.

Results

Data were available for 3,736 patients. Males had more appendicitis attacks than females (p < 0.0001), whereas females had more normal appendixes than males (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of normal appendixes was 19.6 %, with a decline in the past 10 years from a yearly average of 23.5 % between 1998 and 2002 to 15 % between 2003 and 2007 (p < 0.0001) with a reverse correlation with the preoperative use of abdominal CT. A distinct seasonal pattern was observed; more appendectomies for acute appendicitis occurred during the summer months (p < 0.0001). Ten percent of patients had a complicated course with a mortality rate of 0.33 %; most of them were elderly, male/female ratio 0.4.

Conclusions

We found distinct gender, epidemiological, seasonal, and diurnal trends influencing the incidence of acute appendicitis. The incidence rate of false-positive surgery has been gradually declining, probably due to the increased use of preoperative abdominal CT and ultrasound. Acute appendicitis was more common in males and during the summer months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Howie JG (1966) Death from appendicitis and appendicectomy. An epidemiological survey. Lancet 2(7477):1334–1337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR (2001) Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg 233(4):455–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Humes DJ, Simpson J (2006) Acute appendicitis. BMJ 333(7567):530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137(7):799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulson EK, Kalady MF, Pappas TN (2003) Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 348(3):236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Appendicitis BM (1970) Seasonal incidence and postoperative wound infection. Br J Surg 57(2):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod RS (2003) Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 46(4):263–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashley DJ (1967) Observations on the epidemiology of appendicitis. Gut 8(6):533–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SL, Ho HS (2006) Acute appendicitis: is there a difference between children and adults? Am Surg 72(5):409–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graff L, Russell J, Seashore J et al (2000) False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery. Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1244–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan GM, Grillo IA, Abu-Eshy SA, Khan AR, Mubarak J, Jastaniah S (2000) Pathology of the appendix. J Natl Med Assoc 92(11):533–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Florence M, Flum DR, Jurkovich GJ et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248(4):557–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21(2):119–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathan RO, Blackmore CC, Jarvik JG (2008) Therapeutic impact of CT of the appendix in a community hospital emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(4):1102–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown MA (2008) Imaging acute appendicitis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29(5):293–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF (2007) Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 45(3):411–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41(8):745–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brewer BJ, Golden GT, Hitch DC, Rudolf LE, Wangensteen SL (1976) Abdominal pain. An analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases in a University Hospital emergency room. Am J Surg 131(2):219–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Engin O, Calik B, Yildirim M, Coskun A, Coskun GA (2011) Gynecologic pathologies in our appendectomy series and literature review. J Korean Surg Soc 80(4):267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burns RP, Cochran JL, Russell WL, Bard RM (1985) Appendicitis in mature patients. Ann Surg 201(6):695–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Noudeh YJ, Sadigh N, Ahmadnia AY (2007) Epidemiologic features, seasonal variations and false positive rate of acute appendicitis in Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran. Int J Surg 5(2):95–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tobe T (1965) Inapparent virus infection as a trigger of appendicitis. Lancet 1(7400):1343–1346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baier R, Puppel H, Zelder O, Heiming E, Bauer E, Syring J (1982) Frequency and significance of infections due to Yersinia enterocolitica in “acute appendicitis”. Z Gastroenterol 20(2):78–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lamps LW (2004) Appendicitis and infections of the appendix. Semin Diagn Pathol 21(2):86–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Ram.

Additional information

Gideon Y. Stein and Lea Rath-Wolfson contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, G.Y., Rath-Wolfson, L., Zeidman, A. et al. Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397, 1087–1092 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0958-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0958-0

Keywords

Navigation