Skip to main content
Log in

Early source control in sepsis

  • Overview
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Early appropriate therapy in terms of early fluid resuscitation and early antibiotic therapy is beneficial in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The purpose of this review is to address the role of early source control in the management of patients with severe sepsis.

Results

Establishing a clinical diagnosis as soon as possible is a prerequisite in patients with severe sepsis; in some cases, a surgical procedure can also serve as a diagnostic tool. Although source control is considered an essential element in the management of these patients, the definition and usefulness of early source control is not clear. Often, it is suggested that in non-severely ill patients, source control can be postponed up to 24 h, but this is related more to the lack of studies that demonstrate an advantage of early source control than to a sound pathophysiological rationale. Obstacles to early source control are numerous, but in most patients, there is little reason to delay source control for more than a few hours to allow preoperative optimization and correction of metabolic derangements. Finally, a three-level classification of urgency for source control measures is proposed. For every patient, the most appropriate method suited at that particular moment has to be chosen.

Conclusion

Source control is considered an essential element in the management of sepsis and should be considered and performed early after the diagnosis is established in most if not all patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schein M, Marshall J (2002) Source control. A guide to the management of surgical infections. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montgomery RS, Wilson SE (1996) Intraabdominal abscesses: image-guided diagnosis and therapy. Clin Infect Dis 23:28–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O’Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG (2010) Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the surgical infection society and the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:133–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kearney D, Cahill RA, O’Brien E, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP (2008) Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1823–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarsson U (2008) Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 25:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM, Dent DL, Page CP, Gray GA, Pruitt BA Jr, Root HD (2000) Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg 66:548–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omundsen M, Dennett E (2006) Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 76:153–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clyde C, Bax T, Merg A, MacFarlane M, Lin P, Beyersdorf S, McNevin MS (2008) Timing of intervention does not affect outcome in acute appendicitis in a large community practice. Am J Surg 195:590–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, Koo Y, Martin J, Reinhold R, Ciardiello K (2006) Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg 141:504–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR (2001) Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Ann Surg 233:455–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyer A, Vargas F, Coste F, Saubusse E, Castaing Y, Gbikpi-Benissan G, Hilbert G, Gruson D (2009) Influence of surgical treatment timing on mortality from necrotizing soft tissue infections requiring intensive care management. Intensive Care Med 35:847–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, Khin LW, Tan JL, Low CO (2003) Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A:1454–1460

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huffman JL, Schenker S (2010) Acute acalculous cholecystitis: a review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan J. De Waele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Waele, J.J. Early source control in sepsis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 489–494 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0650-1

Keywords

Navigation