Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction (SBO) from abdominal adhesions to both exploratory laparotomy and secondary conversion to open surgery.
Materials and methods
Ninety-three patients (mean age 61 years) with adhesion-induced SBO were divided into successful laparoscopy (66 patients [71%]), secondary conversion (24 [26%]), and primary laparotomy (three patients).
Results
Patients with successful laparoscopy had more simple adhesions (57%), fewer prior operations, and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Operative time was shortest in the laparoscopy group (74.3 ± 4.4 min), as was the duration of both intensive care unit and hospital stay. Mortality was 6%, regardless of operative technique.
Conclusions
A trial of laparoscopic adhesiolysis by a surgeon with advanced laparoscopic skills seems advisable in the majority of patients with acute adhesive SBO, whereas patients with more extensive adhesions, higher ASA class, and more than two prior abdominal operations often require laparotomy to achieve equally satisfactory outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ghosheh B, Salameh JR (2007) Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc 21:1945–1949
Cox MR, Gunn IF, Eastman MC et al (1993) The operative aetiology and types of adhesions causing small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 63:848–852
Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN et al (1999) Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476–1480
Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR et al (1999) Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42:241–248
Mancini GJ, Petroski GF, Lin WC et al (2008) Nationwide impact of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions in the management of intestinal obstruction in the US. J Am Coll Surg 207:520–526
Barkan H, Webster S, Ozeran S (1995) Factors predicting the recurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 170:361–365
Landercasper J, Cogbill TH, Merry WH et al (1993) Long-term outcome after hospitalization for small-bowel obstruction. Arch Surg 128:765–770
Mucha P Jr (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620
Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S et al (2001) Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:141–145
Swank DJ, Hop WC, Jeekel J (2004) Reduction, regrowth, and de novo formation of abdominal adhesions after laparoscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective analysis. Dig Surg 21:66–71
Bastug DF, Trammell SW, Boland JP et al (1991) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:259–262
Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Pharand D (1994) Laparoscopic surgery in acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:289–296
Ibrahim IM, Wolodiger F, Sussman B et al (1996) Laparoscopic management of acute small-bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 10:1012–1014
Leon EL, Metzger A, Tsiotos GG et al (1998) Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction: indications and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2:132–140
Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S et al (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71:641–646
Mathieu X, Thill V, Simoens C et al (2008) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study on 156 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 55:522–526
Navez B, Arimont JM, Guiot P (1998) Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction. A review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 45:2146–2150
Sato Y, Ido K, Kumagai M et al (2001) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 54:476–479
Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA et al (1999) Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 13:695–698
Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkic N et al (2000) Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure? Surg Endosc 14:478–483
Al Mulhim AA (2000) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 14:157–160
Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W et al (2004) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 187:464–470
Pekmezci S, Altinli E, Saribeyoglu K et al (2002) Enteroclysis-guided laparoscopic adhesiolysis in recurrent adhesive small bowel obstructions. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:165–170
Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW et al (2007) Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg 73:773–778
Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montariol T et al (2000) Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:155–159
Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L et al (2005) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 19:464–467
Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O'Rourke N et al (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:84–87
Wullstein C, Gross E (2003) Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90:1147–1151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received the 2008 annual award of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie (Association for Quality Assurance in Surgery) for best data analysis in surgical quality assurance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grafen, F.C., Neuhaus, V., Schöb, O. et al. Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 57–63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0490-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0490-z