Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retained surgical sponge (gossypiboma) after intraabdominal or retroperitoneal surgery: 14 cases treated at a single center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The objective of this study was to present the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management for 14 cases of gossypiboma [retained surgical sponge (RSS)] treated at a single center and to emphasize the importance of this potential complication.

Methods

Data for 14 cases of RSS treated between January 1999 and December 2004 were retrospectively assessed. The details of preoperative evaluation, demographic features, and operative findings were recorded. Use of, and findings from, abdominal x-ray, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy were also noted.

Results

In all cases, the RSS was surgically removed. Thirteen of the 14 patients were symptomatic, and the most frequent finding was nonspecific abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction. Four patients required urgent surgery because the sponges were causing intestinal obstruction or intraabdominal sepsis. Based on history, physical examination findings, and diagnostic imaging, RSS was diagnosed preoperatively in five of the patients. Postoperative complications, including surgical site infection and evisceration, occurred in five cases.

Conclusion

RSS can lead to significant medical and legal problems between the patient and the doctor. RSS may be incorrectly diagnosed preoperatively, which can lead to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures and operations. Strict measures must be taken to prevent this complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moyle H, Hines OJ, McFadden DW (1996) Gossypiboma of the abdomen. Arch Surg 131:566–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain M, Sawhney S (1995) Gossypiboma: ultrasound-guided removal. J Clin Ultrasound 23:321–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lauwers PR, Hee RHV (2000) Intraperitoneal gossypiboma: the need to count sponges. World J Surg 24:521–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaiser CW, Freidman S, Spurling KP, Slowick T, Kaiser HA (1996) The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg 224:79–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gawende AA, Studder DM, Orav EJ et al (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 348:229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Serra J, Matias-Guiu X, Calabuig R, Garcia P, Sancho FJ, Calle JPL (1988) Surgical gauze pseudotumor. Am J Surg 155:235–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyslop JW, Maull KI (1982) Natural history of the retained surgical sponge. South Med J 75:657–660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzales-Ojeda A, Rodriguez-Alcantar DA, Arenas-Marquaz H (1999) Retained foreign bodies following intraabdominal surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 46:808–812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rappaport W, Haynes K (1990) The retained surgical sponge following intra-abdominal surgery. Arch Surg 125:405–407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sturdy JH, Baird RM, Gerein AN (1967) Surgical sponges: a cause of granuloma and adhesion formation. Ann Surg 165:128–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zbar AP, Agrawal A, Saeedi IT, Utidjian MRA (1998) Gossypiboma revisited: a case report and review of the literature. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:417–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cihan A, Mentes B, Tascılar O, Kathan B, Ucan B, Yılmaz E, Gorgul A (1997) Surgical gauze pseudotumor eroding into the intestine. Gazi Med J 8:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richards WO, Keramatı B, Scovill WA (1986) Fate of retained foreign bodies in the peritoneal cavity. South Med J 79:496–498

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin TY, Chuang CK, Wong YC, Liao HC (1999) Gossypiboma: migration of retained surgical gauze and spontaneous transurethral protrusion. BJU Int 84:879–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coche G (1988) Ultrasonography and x-ray computed tomography in the diagnosis of intraabdominal textiloma. Apropos of 12 cases. J Radiol 69:243–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sugano S, Suzuki T, Iinuma M, Mizugami H, Kagesawa M, Ozawa K et al (1993) Gossypiboma: diagnosis with ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 21:289–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugimura H, Tamura S, Kakitsubata Y, Kakaitsubata S, Uwada O, Kihara Y, Nagatomo M, Watanabe K (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of retained surgical sponge. Case report. Clin Imaging 16:259–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uranus U, Schauer C, Pfeifer J et al (1995) Laparoscopic removal of a large laparotomy pad forgotten in situ. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:77–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sedat Yildirim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yildirim, S., Tarim, A., Nursal, T.Z. et al. Retained surgical sponge (gossypiboma) after intraabdominal or retroperitoneal surgery: 14 cases treated at a single center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391, 390–395 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0581-4

Keywords

Navigation