Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) has been reported to be beneficial in terms of survival for locally advanced low rectal carcinoma. However, the impact of LPLD on bowel function has not yet been determined by means of anorectal physiologic investigation.

Patients and methods

Fifty-seven rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection were evaluated with clinical and physiologic parameters. Of these, 15 patients had LPLD. The postoperative bowel and urinary function were evaluated with patients’ questionnaire and anorectal manometry before and after the operation.

Results

The proportion of patients who had pouch reconstruction, adjuvant radiation therapy, and autonomic nerve dissection were significantly higher in the LPLD group. The incidence of evacuatory dysfunction was significantly higher (80% vs 45%) postoperatively in the LPLD group. There was no significant difference in anal sphincter pressures, sensory threshold, and neorectal volumes between the groups postoperatively. In terms of urinary function, use of medication for urination was significantly frequent in the LPLD group. Multivariate analysis identified the level of anastomosis as an independent affecting factor for evacuatory dysfunction and LPLD for urinary dysfunction.

Conclusion

Although LPLD affected urinary dysfunction, it did not impair postoperative evacuatory function in the early postoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hojo K, Koyama Y, Moriya Y (1982) Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Surg 144:350–354

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morikawa E, Yasutomi M, Shindou K, Matsuda T, Mori N, Hida J, Kubo R, Kitaoka M, Nakamura M, Fujimoto K (1994) Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:219–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Havenga K, Enker WE, Norstein J, Moriya Y, Heald R, Houwelingen HC, van de Velde CJ (1999) Improved survival and local control after mesorectal excision or D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: an international analysis of 1411 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Hase K (2001) Prognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer. Ann Surg 234:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujita S, Yamamoto S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2003) Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:1580–1585

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F, Caplin S, Parc R, Tiret E (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y (2004) Oncologic and functional results of total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve-sparing operation for advanced lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1442–1447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagawa H, Muto T, Sunouchi K, Higuchi Y, Tsurita G, Watanabe T, Sawada T (2002) Randomized, controlled trial of lateral node dissection vs. nerve-preserving resection in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1274–1280

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Hachiya Y, Atomi Y (2003) A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 185:556–559

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Hachiya Y, Atomi Y (2004) Gadolinium enhanced endorectal coil and air enema MRI as a useful tool in the preoperative examination of patients with rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 51:131–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morita T, Murata A, Koyama M, Totsuka E, Sasaki M (2003) Current status of autonomic nerve preserving surgery for mid and lower rectal cancers. Japanese experience with lateral node dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:S78–S87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Wakano T, Tokoro T, Kubo R, Shindo K (1998) Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:558–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 389:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson MER, Stephenson BM, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1995) Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sauer I, Bacon H (1951) Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicality of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg 81:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deddish M (1951) Abdominopelvic lymph-node dissection in cancer of the rectum and distal colon. Cancer 4:1364–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. State D (1951) Combined abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a plan for standardization of the proximal extent of dissection. Cancer 4:1364–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH (1986) Recurrence and survival after total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stearns M, Deddish M (1959) Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2:169–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue Y, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J (1991) Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:1434–1438

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J, Takase Y, Mikuni N, Ishikawa H (1999) Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity predict early postoperative defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1145–1151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seow-choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hallböök O, Pählman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Furst A, Suttner S, Agha A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1161–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungqvist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Matsushita K, Yamada K, Sameshima T, Niwa K, Hase S, Akiba S, Aikou T (1997) Prediction of incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 40:575–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Romanos J, Stebbing JF, Smilgin Humphreys MM, Takeuchi N, Mortensen NJM (1996) Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with a colonic J pouch and in normal controls. Br J Surg 83:1744–1746

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hallböök O, Nystrom PO, Sjödahl R (1997) Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Tokoro T, Uchida T, Wakano T, Kubo R (1999) Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch. Defining causes of evacuation difficulty. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1560–1568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T, Wakano T, Uchida T, Ueda K (1999) Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties? Surg Today 29:1237–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yasutomi M (1997) Advances in rectal cancer surgery in Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 40:S74–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyoshi Matsuoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuoka, H., Masaki, T., Sugiyama, M. et al. Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 517–522 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0577-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0577-0

Keywords

Navigation