Abstract
Background and aim
Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) has been reported to be beneficial in terms of survival for locally advanced low rectal carcinoma. However, the impact of LPLD on bowel function has not yet been determined by means of anorectal physiologic investigation.
Patients and methods
Fifty-seven rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection were evaluated with clinical and physiologic parameters. Of these, 15 patients had LPLD. The postoperative bowel and urinary function were evaluated with patients’ questionnaire and anorectal manometry before and after the operation.
Results
The proportion of patients who had pouch reconstruction, adjuvant radiation therapy, and autonomic nerve dissection were significantly higher in the LPLD group. The incidence of evacuatory dysfunction was significantly higher (80% vs 45%) postoperatively in the LPLD group. There was no significant difference in anal sphincter pressures, sensory threshold, and neorectal volumes between the groups postoperatively. In terms of urinary function, use of medication for urination was significantly frequent in the LPLD group. Multivariate analysis identified the level of anastomosis as an independent affecting factor for evacuatory dysfunction and LPLD for urinary dysfunction.
Conclusion
Although LPLD affected urinary dysfunction, it did not impair postoperative evacuatory function in the early postoperative period.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hojo K, Koyama Y, Moriya Y (1982) Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Surg 144:350–354
Morikawa E, Yasutomi M, Shindou K, Matsuda T, Mori N, Hida J, Kubo R, Kitaoka M, Nakamura M, Fujimoto K (1994) Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:219–223
Havenga K, Enker WE, Norstein J, Moriya Y, Heald R, Houwelingen HC, van de Velde CJ (1999) Improved survival and local control after mesorectal excision or D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: an international analysis of 1411 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:368–374
Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Hase K (2001) Prognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer. Ann Surg 234:190–197
Fujita S, Yamamoto S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2003) Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:1580–1585
Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F, Caplin S, Parc R, Tiret E (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372
Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y (2004) Oncologic and functional results of total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve-sparing operation for advanced lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1442–1447
Nagawa H, Muto T, Sunouchi K, Higuchi Y, Tsurita G, Watanabe T, Sawada T (2002) Randomized, controlled trial of lateral node dissection vs. nerve-preserving resection in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1274–1280
Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Hachiya Y, Atomi Y (2003) A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 185:556–559
Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Hachiya Y, Atomi Y (2004) Gadolinium enhanced endorectal coil and air enema MRI as a useful tool in the preoperative examination of patients with rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 51:131–135
Morita T, Murata A, Koyama M, Totsuka E, Sasaki M (2003) Current status of autonomic nerve preserving surgery for mid and lower rectal cancers. Japanese experience with lateral node dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:S78–S87
Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Wakano T, Tokoro T, Kubo R, Shindo K (1998) Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:558–563
Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 389:391–395
Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson MER, Stephenson BM, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1995) Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38:259–263
Sauer I, Bacon H (1951) Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicality of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg 81:111–120
Deddish M (1951) Abdominopelvic lymph-node dissection in cancer of the rectum and distal colon. Cancer 4:1364–1366
State D (1951) Combined abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a plan for standardization of the proximal extent of dissection. Cancer 4:1364–1366
Heald RJ, Ryall RDH (1986) Recurrence and survival after total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482
Stearns M, Deddish M (1959) Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2:169–173
Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346
Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404
Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue Y, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J (1991) Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:1434–1438
Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J, Takase Y, Mikuni N, Ishikawa H (1999) Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity predict early postoperative defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1145–1151
Seow-choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–610
Hallböök O, Pählman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65
Furst A, Suttner S, Agha A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1161–1166
Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungqvist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:214–220
Matsushita K, Yamada K, Sameshima T, Niwa K, Hase S, Akiba S, Aikou T (1997) Prediction of incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 40:575–579
Romanos J, Stebbing JF, Smilgin Humphreys MM, Takeuchi N, Mortensen NJM (1996) Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with a colonic J pouch and in normal controls. Br J Surg 83:1744–1746
Hallböök O, Nystrom PO, Sjödahl R (1997) Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:332–338
Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Tokoro T, Uchida T, Wakano T, Kubo R (1999) Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch. Defining causes of evacuation difficulty. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1560–1568
Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T, Wakano T, Uchida T, Ueda K (1999) Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties? Surg Today 29:1237–1242
Yasutomi M (1997) Advances in rectal cancer surgery in Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 40:S74–S79
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuoka, H., Masaki, T., Sugiyama, M. et al. Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 517–522 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0577-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0577-0