Abstract
Introduction
This study was conducted to clarify whether injuries that are likely to be revealed by initial clinical and conventional radiological examination at the trauma bay (e.g., right-side rib fractures) meaningfully contribute to the prior probability of accompanying hepatic lesions in multiple injured patients.
Material and methods
Fifty-five subjects (sampled from a cohort of 218 patients) with liver injury fulfilling the definition of polytrauma were compared with 55 polytrauma patients without liver injury. Controls were individually matched for age, gender, and Injury Severity Scores. Whole-body, helical, contrast-enhanced computed tomography was applied to all participants. We modeled independent predictors of liver involvement by conditional logistic and random-effects regression analysis.
Results
In the present sample, the prevalence of hepatic injury was 25.2%. Neither the injury mechanism (car crash, pedestrian accident, fall from height) nor certain accompanying injuries (right-side serial rib fractures, lumbar spine fractures) predicted the presence of hepatic injury. Liver injury was particularly unlikely in bikers [odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59–1.03] and patients with left-side rib fractures (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66–0.98).
Discussion
There are no index injuries that will reliably indicate the presence of liver involvement in multiple trauma cases. Also, the absence of these injuries cannot rule out liver damage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stassen NA, Lukan JK, Carrillo EH, Spain DA, Richardson JD (2002) Abdominal seat belt marks in the era of focused abdominal sonography for trauma. Arch Surg 137:718–723
Navarrete-Navarro P, Vazquez G, Bosch JM et al (1996) Computed tomography vs clinical and multidisciplinary procedures for early evaluation of severe abdomen and chest trauma—a cost analysis approach. Intensive Care Med 22:208–212
Blow O, Bassam D, Butler K, Cephas GA, Brady W, Young JS (1998) Speed and efficiency in the resuscitation of blunt abdominal trauma patients with multiple injuries: the advantage of diagnostic peritoneal lavage over abdominal computerized tomography. J Trauma 44:287–290
Jhirad R, Boone D (1998) Computed tomography for evaluating blunt abdominal trauma in the low-volume nondesignated trauma center: the procedure of choice? J Trauma 45:64–68
Taylor CR, Degutis L, Lange R et al (1998) Computed tomography in the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma: impact of severity of injury scale and technical factors on efficacy. J Trauma 44:893–901
Linsenmaier U, Krotz M, Hauser H et al (2002) Whole-body computed tomography in polytrauma: techniques and management. Eur Radiol 12:1728–1740
Okamoto K, Norio H, Kaneko N et al (2002) Use of early-phase dynamic spiral computed tomography for the primary screening of multiple trauma. Am J Emerg Med 20:528–534
Mackersie RC, Tiwary AD, Shackford SR, Hoyt DB (1989) Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma. Identifying the high-risk patient using objective risk factors. Arch Surg 124:809–813
Grieshop NA, Jacobson LE, Gomez GA, Thompson CT, Solotkin KC (1995) Selective use of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 38:727–731
Matthes G, Stengel D, Seifert J, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ekkernkamp A (2003) Blunt liver injuries in polytrauma: results from a cohort study with the regular use of whole-body helical computed tomography. World J Surg 27:1124–1130
Rademacher G, Stengel D, Siegmann S et al (2002) Optimization of contrast agent volume for helical CT in the diagnostic assessment of patients with severe and multiple injuries. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:113–118
Arbeitsgemeinschaft “Scoring” der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) (1994) Das Traumaregister der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 97:230–237
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ et al (1995) Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 38:323–324
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G (2003) Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 326:417
Stengel D, Bauwens K, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ekkernkamp A (2005) Association between compliance with methodological standards affected the reported accuracy of screening ultrasonography (US) for trauma. Radiology (in press)
Pachter HL, Spencer FC, Hofstetter SR et al (1992) Significant trends in the treatment of hepatic trauma. Experience with 411 injuries. Ann Surg. 215:492–500
Croce MA, Fabian TC, Menke PG et al (1995) Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Ann Surg 221:744–755
Coburn MC, Pfeifer J, DeLuca FG (1995) Nonoperative management of splenic and hepatic trauma in the multiply injured pediatric and adolescent patient. Arch Surg 130:332–338
Richardson JD, Franklin GA, Lukan JK et al (2000) Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective. Ann Surg 232:324–330
Hagiwara A, Yukioka T, Ohta S, Tokunaga T, Ohta S, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S (1997) Nonsurgical management of patients with blunt hepatic injury: efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization. Am J Roentgenol 169:1151–1156
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
G. Matthes and D. Stengel contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthes, G., Stengel, D., Bauwens, K. et al. Predictive factors of liver injury in blunt multiple trauma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391, 350–354 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0001-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0001-9