Abstract
In order to provide adequate multivariate measures of information flow between neural structures, modified expressions of partial directed coherence (PDC) and directed transfer function (DTF), two popular multivariate connectivity measures employed in neuroscience, are introduced and their formal relationship to mutual information rates are proved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Marciani MG, Baccalá LA, Fallani FDV, Salinari S, Ursino M, Zavaglia M, Ding L, Edgar JC, Miller GA, He B, Babiloni F (2007) Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings. Hum Brain Mapp 28: 143–157
Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001a) Overcoming the limitations of correlation analysis for many simultaneously processed neural structures. In: Nicolelis MAL (ed) Progress in brain research, vol 130. Advances in Neural Population Coding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 33–47
Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001b) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84(6): 463–474
Baccalá LA, Sameshima K, Ballester G, Valle AC, Timo-Iaria C (1999) Studying the interaction between brain structures via directed coherence and Granger causality. Appl Signal Process 5: 40–48
Baccalá LA, Takahashi DY, Sameshima K (2006) Computer intensive testing for the influence between time-series. In: Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (eds) Handbook of time series analysis. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, pp 411–435
Baccalá LA, Takahashi DY, Sameshima K (2007) Generalized partial directed coherence. In: Cardiff proceedings of the 2007 15th international conference on digital signal processing (DSP 2007), pp 162–166
Blinowska K, Kus R, Kaminski M, Janiszewska J (2010) Transmission of brain activity during cognitive task. Brain Topogr 23(2): 205–213
Gelfand IM, Yaglom AM (1959) Calculation of amount of information about a random function contained in another such function. Am Math Soc Transl Ser 2: 3–52
Geweke JF (1982) Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77: 304–313
Geweke JF (1984) Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 907–915
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relation by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438
Hannan EJ (1970) Multiple time series. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
Hosoya Y (1991) The decomposition and measurement of the interdependency between second-order stationary processes. Probab Theory Relat Fields 88: 429–444
Hosoya Y (2001) Elimination of third-series effect and defining partial measures of causality. J Time Ser Anal 22: 537–554
Kaminski M, Blinowska K (1991) A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern 65: 203–210
Lütkepohl H (1993) Introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Priestley MB (1981) Spectral analysis and time series. Academic Press, London
Schelter B, Timmer J, Eichler M (2009) Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals using renormalized partial directed coherence. J Neurosci Methods 179(1): 121–130
Sommer FT, Wichert A (2003) Exploratory analysis and data modeling in functional neuroimaging. MIT Press, Cambridge
Takahashi DY (2009) Medidas de Fluxo de Informação com Aplicação em Neurociência. PhD Thesis, Programa Interunidades de Pós-graduação em Bioinformática da Universidade de São Paulo [K. Sameshima and L. A. Baccalá, Advisors]
Takahashi DY, Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2010) Frequency domain connectivity: an information theoretic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Buenos Aires. IEEE Press, New York, pp 1726–1729
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, D.Y., Baccalá, L.A. & Sameshima, K. Information theoretic interpretation of frequency domain connectivity measures. Biol Cybern 103, 463–469 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0410-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0410-x