Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recovery of surface pose from texture orientation statistics under perspective projection

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Witkin (1981) derived a model of surface slant and tilt recovery based on the statistics of the orientations of texture elements (texels) on a planar surface. This model made use of basic mathematical properties of probability distributions to formulate a posterior distribution on slant and tilt given a set of image orientations under orthographic projection. One problem with the Witkin model was that it produced a posterior distribution with multiple maxima, reflecting the inherent ambiguity in scene reconstruction under orthographic projection. In the present article, we extend Witkin’s method to incorporate the effects of perspective projection. An identical approach is used to that of Witkin; however, the model now reflects the effects of perspective projection on texel orientation. Performance of the new model is compared against that of Witkin’s model in a basic surface pose recovery task using both a maximum a posteriori (MAP) decision rule and a rule based on the expected value of the posterior distribution. The resultant posterior of the new model is shown to have only one maximum and thereby the ambiguity in scene interpretation is resolved. Furthermore, the model performs better than Witkin’s model using both MAP and expected value decision rules. The results are discussed in the context of human slant estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake A, Marinos C (1990) Shape from texture—estimation, isotropy and moments. Artifi Intell 45: 323–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake A, Bülthoff HH, Sheinberg DL (1993) Shape from texture—ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vis Res 33: 1723–1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady M, Yuille A (1984) An extremum principle for shape from contour. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6: 288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein ML (1968) Motion and texture as sources of slant information. J Exp Psychol 78: 247–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley D, Frisby JP, Blake A (1995) Does the human visual system implement an ideal observer theory of slant from texture?. Vis Res 36: 1163–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle RA, Hogervorst MA (1999) The role of perspective information in the recovery of 3D structure-from-motion. Vis Res 39: 1713–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gårding J (1993a) Direct estimation of shape from texture. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15: 1202–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gårding J (1993b) Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy. J Artif Intell 64: 243–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber HE, Clark WC (1956) Perception of slanted surfaces. Percept Mot Ski 6: 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogervorst MA, Eagle RA (2000) The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 934–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn BKP, Brooks MJ (1989) Shape from shading. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanatani K (1984) Detection of surface orientation and motion from texture by a stereological technique. Artif Intell 23: 213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill DC (1998) Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues. Vis Res 38: 1655–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knill DC (2003) Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues. Vis Res 43: 831–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ, Kappers AML (1992) Surface perception in pictures. Percept Psychophys 52: 487–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Zaidi Q (2000) Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vis Res 40: 217–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malik J, Rosenholtz R (1997) Computing local surface orientation and shape from texture for curved surfaces. Int J Comput Vis 23: 149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamassian P, Landy MS (1998) Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vis Res 38: 2817–2832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamassian P, Landy MS, Maloney LT (2002) Bayesian modelling of visual perception. In: Rao R, Olshausen B, Lewicki M (eds) Probabilistic models of the brain: perception and neural function. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Jupp PE (1999) Directional statistics, 2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingolla E, Todd JT (1986) Perception of solid shape from shading. Biol Cybern 53: 137–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz R, Malik J (1997) Surface orientation from texture: isotropy or homogeneity (or both)?. Vis Res 37: 2283–2293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seyama J, Takeuchi T, Sato T (2000) Tilt dependency of slant after-effect. Vis Res 40: 349–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone JV (1993) Shape from local and global analysis of texture. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 339: 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velisavljevic L, Elder JH (2006) Texture properties affecting the accuracy of surface attitude judgements. Vis Res 46: 2166–2191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren PA, Mamassian P (2003) The dependence of slant perception on texture orientation statistics. J Vis, 3, abstract 847

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin AP (1981) Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artif Intell 17: 17–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

    Paul A. Warren

  2. Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception (CNRS UMR 8158), Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France

    Pascal Mamassian

Authors
  1. Paul A. Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pascal Mamassian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Warren.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the Electronic Supplementary material.

ESM 1 (DOC 220 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren, P.A., Mamassian, P. Recovery of surface pose from texture orientation statistics under perspective projection. Biol Cybern 103, 199–212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0389-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0389-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation