Skip to main content
Log in

Factors limiting cold-water swimming distance while wearing personal floatation devices

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of body adiposity, arm skinfold thickness, aerobic capacity, and cooling rate were studied in a mock survival swimming situation conducted in water at around 14 °C. Seventeen adult participants wore personal floatation devices on top of seasonal clothing and were asked to swim as far as they could, as if attempting to reach shore following an accidental immersion in cold water. Triceps and patellar skinfold thickness showed a significant correlation with distance covered (r=0.70 and 0.56, respectively), while abdominal skinfold and percent body fat showed no significant correlation. Maximum oxygen consumption (O2max) was not significantly related to distance covered. There was a negative correlation between body cooling rate during the swimming period and distance covered. A multiple stepwise regression analysis, however, indicated that the only significant contributor to variance in the distance covered was the triceps skinfold thickness (r 2=0.49). It was concluded that for a healthy subject accidentally immersed in cold water, triceps skinfold thickness is a stronger predictor of the swimming distance covered than body adiposity, O2max, or the drop in core temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 8 December 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallingford, R., Ducharme, M. & Pommier, E. Factors limiting cold-water swimming distance while wearing personal floatation devices. Eur J Appl Physiol 82, 24–29 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050647

Navigation