Abstract
Purpose
Previous research has indicated greater muscle activation is needed for children (CH) to match relative intensity submaximal contractions in comparison with adults (AD). However, no study has compared motor unit (MU) firing and recruitment patterns between children and adults. Therefore, MU action potential amplitudes (MUAPAMP) and firing rates were examined during two repetitive submaximal contractions of the first dorsal interosseous in children and adults.
Methods
Twenty-two children (age 9.0 ± 0.8 years) and 13 adults (age 22.9 ± 4.8 years) completed three maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) and two repetitive isometric contractions at 30% MVC for 40 s. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded and decomposed into action potential trains. MUAPAMPS, recruitment thresholds (RTs), and mean firing rates (MFRs) were calculated, and EMG amplitude was normalized (N-EMG) to MVC. For each subject and repetition, linear MFR vs. RT and exponential MUAPAMP vs. RT and MFR vs. MUAPAMP relationships were calculated.
Results
N-EMG (P = 0.001, CH = 56.5 ± 31.7%, AD = 30.3 ± 9.1%), MFRs regardless of RT, according to greater y-intercepts of the MFR vs. RT relationships [P = 0.013, CH = 31.1 ± 5.1 pulses per second (pps), AD = 25.9 ± 4.3 pps] and MFRs of MUs with smaller action potential amplitudes (P = 0.017, CH = 29.4 ± 6.8 pps, AD = 23.5 ± 3.5 pps), were greater for children. MUAPAMPS in relation with RT were similar between groups except the highest threshold MUs (RT = 28% MVC) were greater for the adults (1.02 ± 0.43 mV) than children (0.67 ± 0.24 mV) (P = 0.010).
Conclusions
Muscle activation and MU firing rates were greater for children, which likely indicated a greater operating point of MU control in comparison with adults during an isometric contraction performed at a relative submaximal intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Adults
- CH:
-
Children
- CSA:
-
Cross-sectional area
- EMG:
-
Electromyography
- FDI:
-
First dorsal interosseous
- MFR:
-
Mean firing rate
- MU:
-
Motor unit
- MUAPAMP :
-
Motor unit action potential amplitude
- MUAPDUR :
-
Motor unit action potential duration
- MVC:
-
Maximum voluntary contraction
- N-EMG:
-
Normalized electromyographic amplitude
- P-EMG:
-
Peak electromyographic amplitude
- REP:
-
Repetition
- RT:
-
Recruitment threshold
- STA:
-
Spike trigger average
References
Adam A, De Luca CJ (2005) Firing rates of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle during fatiguing isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985) 99:268–280. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01344.2004
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300
Burnett RA, Laidlaw DH, Enoka RM (2000) Coactivation of the antagonist muscle does not covary with steadiness in old adults. J Appl Physiol (1985) 89:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.61
Contessa P, De Luca CJ (2013) Neural control of muscle force: indications from a simulation model. J Neurophysiol 109:1548–1570. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00237.2012
Contessa P, De Luca CJ, Kline JC (2016) The compensatory interaction between motor unit firing behavior and muscle force during fatigue. J Neurophysiol 116:1579–1585. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00347.2016
Contessa P, Letizi J, De Luca G, Kline JC (2018) Contribution from motor unit firing adaptations and muscle co-activation during fatigue. J Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00766.2017
Conwit RA, Stashuk D, Tracy B, McHugh M, Brown WF, Metter EJ (1999) The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force. Clin Neurophysiol 110:1270–1275
De Luca CJ, Contessa P (2011) Hierarchical control of motor units in voluntary contractions. J Neurophysiol 107:178–195. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00961.2010
De Luca CJ, Erim Z (1994) Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17:299–305
De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP (1982) Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol 329:113–128
De Luca CJ, Foley PJ, Erim Z (1996) Motor unit control properties in constant-force isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 76:1503–1516
de Ruiter CJ, Elzinga MJ, Verdijk PW, van Mechelen W, de Haan A (2005) Changes in force, surface and motor unit EMG during post-exercise development of low frequency fatigue in vastus lateralis muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:659–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-1356-x
De Luca CJ, Adam A, Wotiz R, Gilmore LD, Nawab SH (2006) Decomposition of surface EMG signals. J Neurophysiol 96:1646–1657. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00009.2006
Dorfman LJ, Howard JE, McGill KC (1990) Triphasic behavioral response of motor units to submaximal fatiguing exercise. Muscle Nerve 13:621–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130711
Dotan R, Mitchell C, Cohen R, Klentrou P, Gabriel D, Falk B (2012) Child-adult differences in muscle activation—a review. Pediatr Exerc Sci 24:2–21
Farina D, Holobar A, Gazzoni M, Zazula D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2009) Adjustments differ among low-threshold motor units during intermittent, isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 101:350–359. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90968.2008
Farina D, Holobar A, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2010) Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1616–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.040
Goldberg LJ, Derfler B (1977) Relationship among recruitment order, spike amplitude, and twitch tension of single motor units in human masseter muscle. J Neurophysiol 40:879–890
Grosset JF, Mora I, Lambertz D, Perot C (2008) Voluntary activation of the triceps surae in prepubertal children. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18:455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.11.002
Hakansson CH (1956) Conduction velocity and amplitude of the action potential as related to circumference in the isolated fibre of frog muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 37:14–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1956.tb01338.x
Henneman E (1957) Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science 126:1345–1347
Herda TJ, Siedlik JA, Trevino MA, Cooper MA, Weir JP (2015) Motor unit control strategies of endurance- versus resistance-trained individuals. Muscle Nerve 52:832–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24597
Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D (2005) Post-activation potentiation: underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Med 35:585–595
Hu X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2013a) Assessment of validity of a high-yield surface electromyogram decomposition. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-99
Hu X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2013b) Motor unit pool organization examined via spike-triggered averaging of the surface electromyogram. J Neurophysiol 110:1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00301.2012
Hu X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2013c) Reliability of spike triggered averaging of the surface electromyogram for motor unit action potential estimation. Muscle Nerve 48:557–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23819
Kamen G, Sison SV, Du CC, Patten C (1995) Motor unit discharge behavior in older adults during maximal-effort contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985) 79:1908–1913
Keenan KG, Farina D, Maluf KS, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2005) Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. J Appl Physiol (1985) 98:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00894.2004
Klein CS, Hager-Ross CK, Thomas CK (2006) Fatigue properties of human thenar motor units paralysed by chronic spinal cord injury. J Physiol 573:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103044
Lambertz D, Mora I, Grosset JF, Perot C (2003) Evaluation of musculotendinous stiffness in prepubertal children and adults, taking into account muscle activity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 95:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00885.2002
Martinez Valdes E, Negro F, Falla D, De Nunzio AM, Farina D (2018) Surface EMG amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2017
Masakado Y, Noda Y, Nagata MA, Kimura A, Chino N, Akaboshi K (1994) Macro-EMG and motor unit recruitment threshold: differences between the young and the aged. Neurosci Lett 179:1–4
Masakado Y, Akaboshi K, Nagata M, Kimura A, Chino N (1995) Motor unit firing behavior in slow and fast contractions of the first dorsal interosseous muscle of healthy men. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 97:290–295
McGill KC, Lateva ZC, Marateb HR (2005) EMGLAB: an interactive EMG decomposition program. J Neurosci Methods 149:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.05.015
McManus L, Hu X, Rymer WZ, Lowery MM, Suresh NL (2015) Changes in motor unit behavior following isometric fatigue of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Neurophysiol 113:3186–3196. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00146.2015
McNeil CJ, Butler JE, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2013) Testing the excitability of human motoneurons. Front Hum Neurosci 7:152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00152
Miller JD, Herda TJ, Trevino MA, Sterczala AJ, Ciccone AB, Nicoll JX (2017) Age-related differences in twitch properties and muscle activation of the first dorsal interosseous. Clin Neurophysiol 128:925–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.032
Miller JD, Sterczala AJ, Trevino MA, Herda TJ (2018) Examination of muscle composition and motor unit behavior of the first dorsal interosseous of normal and overweight children. J Neurophysiol 119:1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00675.2017
Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB (1975) The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol 246:549–569
Monster AW, Chan H (1977) Isometric force production by motor units of extensor digitorum communis muscle in man. J Neurophysiol 40:1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1977.40.6.1432
Morse CI, Tolfrey K, Thom JM, Vassilopoulos V, Maganaris CN, Narici MV (2008) Gastrocnemius muscle specific force in boys and men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 104:469–474. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00697.2007
Murphy JR, Button DC, Chaouachi A, Behm DG (2014) Prepubescent males are less susceptible to neuromuscular fatigue following resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 114:825–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2809-2
Nawab SH, Chang SS, De Luca CJ (2010) High-yield decomposition of surface EMG signals. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1602–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.092
O’Brien TD, Reeves ND, Baltzopoulos V, Jones DA, Maganaris CN (2010) In vivo measurements of muscle specific tension in adults and children. Exp Physiol 95:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2009.048967
Paasuke M, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H (2000) Twitch contraction properties of plantar flexor muscles in pre- and post-pubertal boys and men. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210000236
Person RS, Kudina LP (1972) Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 32:471–483
Pope ZK, Hester GM, Benik FM, DeFreitas JM (2016) Action potential amplitude as a noninvasive indicator of motor unit-specific hypertrophy. J Neurophysiol 115:2608–2614. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00039.2016
Ratel S, Duche P, Williams CA (2006) Muscle fatigue during high-intensity exercise in children. Sports Med 36:1031–1065
Sandercock TG, Faulkner JA, Albers JW, Abbrecht PH (1985) Single motor unit and fiber action potentials during fatigue. J Appl Physiol (1985) 58:1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1985.58.4.1073
Sterczala AJ, Herda TJ, Miller JD, Ciccone AB, Trevino MA (2017) Age-related differences in the motor unit action potential size in relation to recruitment threshold. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12453
Sterczala AJ, Miller JD, Trevino MA, Dimmick HL, Herda TJ (2018) Differences in the motor unit firing rates and amplitudes in relation to recruitment thresholds during submaximal contractions of the first dorsal interosseous between chronically resistance trained and physically active men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0646
Stock MS, Beck TW, Defreitas JM (2012) Effects of fatigue on motor unit firing rate versus recruitment threshold relationships. Muscle Nerve 45:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22266
Tanji J, Kato M (1973) Firing rate of individual motor units in voluntary contraction of abductor digiti minimi muscle in man. Exp Neurol 40:771–783
Trevino MA et al (2018) Sex-related differences in muscle size explained by amplitudes of higher-threshold motor unit action potentials and muscle fiber typing. Acta Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13151
Watanabe K, Holobar A, Kouzaki M, Ogawa M, Akima H, Moritani T (2016) Age-related changes in motor unit firing pattern of vastus lateralis muscle during low-moderate contraction. Age 38:1–14
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the undergraduate students who assisted in the collection of data, as well as each of the subjects for their selfless participation.
Funding
This study was supported financially by the National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation’s Graduate Research Grant (#0000010446) and by the University of Kansas via the General Research Fund (GRF 2301166-RSC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TJH and JDM conceived and designed the study. JDM, AJS, HLD, MEW, and MAT collected and analyzed the data. All authors interpreted the results. JDM prepared the first draft of the manuscript and figures. All authors edited the figures and manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed. All experiments were performed in the University of Kansas Neuromechanics Laboratory.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University Institutional Review Boards for Human Subjects and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Communicated by Toshio Moritani.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, J.D., Sterczala, A.J., Trevino, M.A. et al. Motor unit action potential amplitudes and firing rates during repetitive muscle actions of the first dorsal interosseous in children and adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 119, 1007–1018 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04090-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04090-0