Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon on energy cost and running mechanics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the effects of the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon (Tor des Géants® 2012) on the energy cost of three types of locomotion (cycling, level and uphill running) and running kinematics.

Methods

Before (pre-) and immediately after (post-) the competition, a group of ten male experienced ultra-marathon runners performed in random order three submaximal 4-min exercise trials: cycling at a power of 1.5 W kg−1 body mass; level running at 9 km h−1 and uphill running at 6 km h−1 at an inclination of +15 % on a motorized treadmill. Two video cameras recorded running mechanics at different sampling rates.

Results

Between pre- and post-, the uphill-running energy cost decreased by 13.8 % (P = 0.004); no change was noted in the energy cost of level running or cycling (NS). There was an increase in contact time (+10.3 %, P = 0.019) and duty factor (+8.1 %, P = 0.001) and a decrease in swing time (−6.4 %, P = 0.008) in the uphill-running condition.

Conclusion

After this extreme mountain ultra-marathon, the subjects modified only their uphill-running patterns for a more economical step mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

θ A (°):

Ankle angle

\(\dot{V}\)CO2 (L min−1):

Carbon dioxide output

t c (s):

Contact time

CT (s):

Cycle time

DF (%):

Duty factor

EC:

End of contact

C cycl (kJ L−1):

Energy cost of cycling

C r (J m−1 kg−1):

Energy cost of running

MUM:

Extreme mountain ultra-marathon

θ F (°):

Foot angle

GE (%):

Gross efficiency

IC:

Initial contact

θ K (°):

Knee angle

\(\dot{W}\) vert (W kg−1):

Mechanical work rate

\(\dot{V}\)O2 (L min−1):

Oxygen uptake

\(\dot{V}\)E (L min−1):

Pulmonary ventilation

t −1c (s−1):

Rate of force application

RER:

Respiratory exchange ratio

θ L (°):

Shank angle

SF (Hz):

Stride frequency

SL (m):

Stride length

t s (s):

Swing time

θ T (°):

Thigh angle

\(\dot{V}\)E/\(\dot{V}\)CO2 :

Ventilatory equivalent ratio for carbon dioxide

\(\dot{V}\)E/\(\dot{V}\)O2 :

Ventilatory equivalent ratio for oxygen

References

  • Abbiss CR, Laursen PB (2008) Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med 38:239–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bijker KE, De Groot G, Hollander AP (2001) Delta efficiencies of running and cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1546–1551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bijker KE, de Groot G, Hollander AP (2002) Differences in leg muscle activity during running and cycling in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:556–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blickhan R (1989) The spring-mass model for running and hopping. J Biomech 22:1217–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brϋckner JC, Atchou G, Capelli C, Duvallet A, Barrault B, Jousselin E, Rieu M, di Prampero PE (1991) The energy cost of running increases with the distance covered. Eur J Appl Physiol 62:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, Leardini A (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 10:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh PR, Kram R (1985) Mechanical and muscular factors affecting the efficiency of human movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:326–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh PR, Williams KR (1982) The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan A, Lodder MAN, Sargeant AJ (1991) Influence of an active prestretch on fatigue of skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 62:268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degache F, Guex K, Fourchet F, Morin JB, Millet GP, Tomazin K, Millet GY (2013) Changes in running mechanics and spring-mass behaviour induced by a 5-h hilly running bout. J Sports Sci 31:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Salvadego D, Fusi S, Grassi B (2009) A simple method for assessing the energy cost of running during incremental tests. J Appl Physiol 107:1068–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foissac MJ, Berthollet R, Seux J, Belli A, Millet GY (2008) Effects of hiking pole inertia on energy and muscular costs during uphill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:1117–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez P, Kerhervé H, Messonnier LA, Féasson L, Millet GY (2013) Changes in the energy cost of running during a 24-h treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45:1807–1813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes PR, Bowen SJ, Davies EJ (2004) The relationships between local muscular endurance and kinematic changes during a run to exhaustion at vVO2max. J Strength Cond Res 18:898–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higham TE, Biewener AA (2008) Integration within and between muscles during terrestrial locomotion: effects of incline and speed. J Exp Biol 211:2303–2316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter I, Smith GA (2007) Preferred and optimal stride frequency, stiffness and economy: changes with fatigue during a 1-h high-intensity run. Eur J Appl Physiol 100:653–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knechtle B (2012) Ultramarathon runners: nature or nurture? Int J Sports Physiol Perform 7:310–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komi PV (2000) Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J Biomech 33:1197–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyröläinen H, Pullinen T, Candau R, Avela J, Huttunen P, Komi PV (2000) Effects of marathon running economy and kinematics. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzer S, Salvadego D, Rejc E, Buglione A, Antonutto G, di Prampero PE (2012) The energetics of ultra-endurance running. Eur J Appl Physiol 112:1709–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA, Valiant G, Frederick EC (1985) Groucho running. J Appl Physiol 62:2326–2337

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet GP (2012) Economy is not sacrificed in ultramarathon runners. J Appl Physiol 113:686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GP, Millet GY (2012) Ultramarathon is an outstanding model for the study of adaptive responses to extreme load and stress. BMC Med 10:77

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet G, Lepers R, Lattier G, Martin V, Babault N, Maffiuletti N (2000) Influence of ultra-long-term fatigue on the oxygen cost of two types of locomotion. Eur J Appl Physiol 83:376–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Lepers R, Maffiuletti NA, Babault N, Martin V, Lattier G (2002) Alterations of neuromuscular function after an ultramarathon. J Appl Physiol 92:486–492

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GP, Vleck VE, Bentley DJ (2009a) Physiological differences between cycling and running. Lessons from triathletes. Sports Med 39:179–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Morin JB, Degache F, Edouard P, Feasson L, Verney J, Oullion R (2009b) Running from Paris to Beijing: biomechanical and physiological consequences. Eur J Appl Physiol 107:731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Banfi JC, Kerherve H, Morin JB, Vincent L, Estrade C, Geyssant A, Feasson L (2011a) Physiological and biological factors associated with a 24 h treadmill ultra-marathon performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21:54–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Tomazin K, Verges S, Vincent C, Bonnefoy R, Boisson RC, Gergele L, Feasson L, Martin V (2011b) Neuromuscular consequences of an extreme mountain ultra-marathon. PLoS One 6:e17059

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Hoffman MD, Morin JB (2012) Sacrificing economy to improve running performance–a reality in the ultramarathon? J Appl Physiol 113:507–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1994) Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans. J Exp Biol 195:211–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Moia C, Roi GS, Susta D, Ferretti G (2002) Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol 93:1039–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morin JB, Tomazin K, Edouard P, Millet GY (2011) Changes in running mechanics and spring-mass behavior induced by a mountain ultra-marathon race. J Biomech 44:1104–1107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley L, Jeukendrup AE (2001) The reliability of cycling efficiency. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:621–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WL (1983) Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46:135–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol C, Komi PV, Marconnet P (1991a) Effects of marathon fatigue on running kinematics and economy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol C, Komi PV, Marconnet P (1991b) Fatigue effects of marathon running on neuromuscular performance. Changes in force, integrated electromyographic activity and endurance capacity. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padulo J, Powell D, Milia R, Ardigò LP (2013) A paradigm of uphill running. PLoS One 8:e69006

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JSM, Carter H, Doust JH, Jones AM (2002) Oxygen uptake kinetics during horizontal and uphill treadmill running in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:163–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley PO, Dicharry J, Franz J, Della Croce U, Wilder RP, Kerrigan DC (2008) A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:1093–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TJ, Belliveau RA (2005) Sources of mechanical power for uphill running in humans. J Exp Biol 208:1963–1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TJ, Kram R, Weyand PG, Taylor CR (1998) Energetics of bipedal running. I. Metabolic cost of generating force. J Exp Biol 201:2745–2751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson J, Heliams DB, Lloyd DG, Fournier PA (2004) Gait selection in the ostrich: mechanical and metabolic characteristics of walking and running with and without an aerial phase. Proc Biol Sci 271:1091–1099

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saugy J, Place N, Millet GY, Degache F, Schena F, Millet GP (2013) Alterations of neuromuscular function after the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon. PLoS One 8:e65596

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt D (2003) Insights into the evolution of human bipedalism from experimental studies of humans and other primates. J Exp Biol 206:1437–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schobersberger W, Wirleitner B, Puschendorf B, Koller A, Villiger B, Frey W, Mair J (1996) Influence of an ultramarathon race at moderate altitude on coagulation and fibrinolysis. Fibrinolysis 10:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siler WL, Martin PE (1991) Changes in running pattern during a treadmill run to volitional exhaustion: fast versus slower runners. Int J Sport Biomech 7:12–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder KL, Farley CT (2011) Energetically optimal stride frequency in running: the effects of incline and decline. J Exp Biol 214:2089–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder KL, Kram R, Gottschall JS (2012) The role of elastic energy storage and recovery in downhill and uphill running. J Exp Biol 215:2283–2287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR, Caldwell SL, Rowntree VJ (1972) Running up and down hills: some consequences of size. Science 178:1096–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitiello D, Rupp T, Bussière JL, Robach P, Polge A, Millet GY, Nottin S (2013) Myocardial damages and left and right ventricular strains after an extreme mountain ultra-long duration exercise. Int J Cardiol 165:391–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KR (1985) Biomechanics of running. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 13:389–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (2009) The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the subjects involved in the present study for their participation, especially during the test sessions in the fatigue condition. We would also like to express our gratitude to Aurelio Marguerettaz, the Regione Autonoma della Valle d’Aosta, the Tor de Géants® Organizing Committee, the Courmayeur Trailers, and Maurizio Capolupo. We thank also Kenneth A. Britsch for checking the manuscript for English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Vernillo.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-René Lacour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernillo, G., Savoldelli, A., Zignoli, A. et al. Influence of the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon on energy cost and running mechanics. Eur J Appl Physiol 114, 929–939 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2824-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2824-y

Keywords

Navigation