Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of BIA in the measurement of total body composition and regional fat and the fat free mass in the healthy young adults. Four hundred and three healthy young adults (167 women and 236 men) aged 18–29 years were recruited from the Mid-West region of Ireland. Multi frequency, eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used to measure the total body and segmental (arm, leg and trunk) fat mass and the fat free mass. BIA was found to underestimate the percentage total body fat in men and women (p < 0.001). This underestimate increased in men with >24.6% body fat and women with >32% body fat (p < 0.001). Fat tissue mass in the trunk segment was overestimated by 2.1 kg (p < 0.001) in men and underestimated by 0.4 kg (p < 0.001) in women. BIA was also found to underestimate the fat free mass in the appendages by 1.0 kg (p < 0.001) in men and 0.9 kg (p < 0.001) in women. Compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis underestimates the total body fat mass and overestimates fat free mass in healthy young adults. BIA should, therefore, be used with caution in the measurement of total body composition in women and men with >25% total body fat. Though statistically significant, the small difference (~ 4%) between the methods indicates that the BIA may be used interchangeably with DXA in the measurement of appendicular fat free mass in healthy young adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumgartner RN (1996) Electrical impedance and total body electrical conductivity. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield S, Lohman TG (eds) Human body composition. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden RG, Lanning BA, Doyle EI, Johnston HM, Nassar EI, Slonaker B, Scanes G, Rasmussen C (2005) Comparison of body composition measures to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Exerc Physiol online 8(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Paymans I, van der Kooy K (1988) Factors affecting bioelectrical impedance measurements in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 42(12):1017–1022

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deurenberg P, Andreoli A, Borg P, Kukkonen-Harjula K, de Lorenzo A, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Testolin G, Vigano R, Vollaard N (2001) The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations. Eur J Clin Nutr 55(11):973–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duz S, Kocak M, Korkusuz F (2009) Evaluation of body composition using three different methods compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Sport Sci 9(3):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis KJ (2000) Human body composition: in vivo methods. Physiol Rev 80(2):649–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg A, Davenport A (2011) Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments in outpatient hemodialysis Patients. Am J Kidney Dis 57(1):123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher MR, Walker KZ, O’Dea K (1998) The influence of a breakfast meal on the assessment of body composition using bioelectrical impedence. Eur J Clin Nutr 52:94–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, Sakamoto Y (2000) Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 72:694–701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genton L, Hans D, Kyle UG, Pichard C (2002) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods. Nutrition 18(1):66–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman SG, Marn CS, Supiano MA, Dengel DR (2004) Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. J Appl Physiol 97:509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huizenga R, Barden HS, Oates MK (2007) Precision of Lunar iDXA total body BMD and composition measurements on obese subjects. Paper presented at the ISCD Annual Meeting. Tampa, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull H, He Q, Thornton J, Javed F, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Gallagher D (2009) iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross calibration study. J Clin Densitom 12(1):95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kriemler S, Puder J, Zahner L, Roth R, Braun-Fahrlander C, Bedogni G (2009) Cross-validation of bioelectrical inpedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children. Eur J Clin Nutr 63:619–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchoir JC, Pirlich M, Scharfetter H, Schols AMWJ, Pichard C (2004) Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part 1: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 23:1226–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malavolti M, Mussi C, Poli M, Fantuzzi A, Salvioli G, Battistini N, Bedogni G (2003) Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21–82 years. Ann Hum Biol 30(4):380–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oates MK, Barden HS, Huizenga R (2007) Body composition with idxa in obese subjects with and without metabolic syndrome. Paper presented at the ISCD Annual Meeting. Tampa, FL

  • Oshima Y, Shiga T (2006) Within-day variability of whole-body and segmental bioelectrical impedence in a standing position. Eur J Clin Nutr 60:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge M-P, Heymsfield SB (2004) New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:1479–1484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roubenoff R, Kehayias JJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Heymsfield SB (1993) Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a “gold standard”. Am J Clin Nutr 58:589–591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubiano F, Nunez C, Heymsfield SB (2000) A comparison of body composition techniques. Ann NY Acad Sci 904:335–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, French CR, Martin GR, Younghusband B, Green RC, Xie Y, Mathews M, Barron JR, Fitzpatrick DG, Gulliver W, Zhang H (2005) Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population. Am J Clin Nutr 81:74–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tataranni PA, Ravussin E (1995) Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 62(4):730–734

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanapenpaiboon N, Lukito W, Strauss BJG, Hsu-Hage BHH, Wahlqvist ML, Stroud DB (1998) Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Celtic Australians. Int J Obes 22:854–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding from a University of Limerick Research Grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Siobhan Leahy, Cian O’Neill, Rhoda Sohun & Philip Jakeman

Authors
  1. Siobhan Leahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cian O’Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rhoda Sohun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip Jakeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siobhan Leahy.

Additional information

Communicated by Susan A. Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leahy, S., O’Neill, C., Sohun, R. et al. A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 112, 589–595 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2010-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation