Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recognition of activities in children by two uniaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a classification procedure for accelerometer data to recognize the mode of children’s physical activity (PA) in free-living conditions and to compare it with an established cutoff method. Hip and wrist accelerometer data with an epoch interval of 1 s were collected for 7 days from 24 girls (age: 10.7 ± 1.7 years) and 17 boys (age: 10.6 ± 1.6 years). Videos were recorded during the same 7 days at several points of time at school and during leisure time. Each second of video data was labeled as one of nine activity classes. A classification procedure based on pattern recognition algorithms was trained with the accelerometer data relating to respective video labels of half of the children and tested against the data from the other half of the children. The overall recognition rate of the classification procedure was 67%. The procedure was able to classify 90% of stationary activities, 83% of walking, 81% of running and 61% of jumping activities. The remaining activities could not be recognized by the main classifier. This study developed a classification procedure based on well-accepted accelerometers and video recordings to recognize children’s PA in free-living conditions. It has been shown to be valid for the activities of being stationary, walking, running and jumping. In contrast to former measurement and analysis procedures, this method is able to determine the modes of specific activities among children. Consequently, the presented classification procedure provides additional information on the PA behavior in children registered by established accelerometers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, Ekelund U, Brage S, Anderssen SA (2006) Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lancet 368:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson D, Slinde F, Larsson S, Hultén L (2007) Energy cost of physical activities in children: validation of SenseWear Armband. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:2076–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, Porszasz J, Barstow TJ, Cooper DM (1995) The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1033–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bao L, Intille SS (2004) Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration. In: Ferscha A, Mattern F (eds) Pervasive 2004. LNCS, vol 3001. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–17

  • Baranowski T (1988) Validity and reliability of self report measures of physical activity: an information-processing perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 59:314–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR Jr (2007) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S30–S36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi AG, Goris AHC, Yin B, Westerterp KR (2009) Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1770–1777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW, Andersen LB, Froberg K (2003) Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1447–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwart AP, Fischer FP (1970) A generalized k-nearest neighbour rule. Inform Control 16:128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissa MA, Yetman RJ, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ (1999) Comparison of arbitrary definitions of circadian time periods with those determined by wrist actigraphy in analysis of ABPM data. J Hum Hypertens 13:449–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund U, Yngve A, Brage S, Westerterp K, Sjostrom M (2004) Body movement and physical activity energy expenditure in children and adolescents: how to adjust for differences in body size and age. Am J Clin Nutr 79:851–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L, GcGowan C, Woodall K (1984) A behavioral observation system for free play activity in young overweight female children. Res Q Exerc Sport 55:180–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedson P, Pober D (2005) Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S523–S530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM (2001) Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 16:148–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janz KF (1994) Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children’s physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:369–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl HW, Fulton JE, Caspersen CJ (2000) Assessment of physical activity among children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Prev Med 31:S54–S76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie TL (1991) Observational measures of children’s physical activity. J Sch Health 61:224–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR, Patterson TL, Elder JP, Berry CC, Rupp JW, Atkins CJ, Buono MJ, Nelson JA (1991) BEACHES: an observational system for assessing children’s eating and physical activity behaviors and associated events. J Appl Behav Anal 24:141–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melanson EL Jr, Freedson PS (1995) Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:934–940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf BS, Curnow JS, Evans C, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ (2002) Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: the early bird study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1533–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pärkkä J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I (2006) Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10:119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson PS (2006) Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:1626–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF (2002) Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 10(3):150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi N, Dandekar N, Mysore P, Littman ML (2005) Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In: Proceedings of 20th national Conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-05). American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp 1541–1546

  • Riddoch CJ, Bo Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, Harro M, Klasson-Heggebo L, Sardinha LB, Cooper AR, Ekelund U (2004) Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka C, Tanak S, Kawahara J, Midorikawa T (2007) Triaxial accelerometry for assessment of physical activity in young children. Obesity 15:1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, McMurray RG, Murray DM, Almeida MJ, Going S, Norman JE, Pate R (2004) Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1259–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR (1998) Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC (2000) Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:426–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welk G, Schaben J, Morrow JA Jr (2004) Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generaizibility study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1637–1645

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the children and their parents for their willingness to participate in the study. The study was supported by grants from the Swiss Federal Council of Sports.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physical Activity and Health Unit, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport SFIS, Hauptstrasse 247, 2532, Magglingen, Switzerland

    N. Ruch, M. Rumo & U. Mäder

Authors
  1. N. Ruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Rumo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Mäder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Ruch.

Additional information

Communicated by Klaas R Westerterp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruch, N., Rumo, M. & Mäder, U. Recognition of activities in children by two uniaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 1917–1927 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1828-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation