Abstract
The SenseWear Armband (SWA) has been shown to be a valid and practical tool to assess energy expenditure during habitual physical activity. However, previous studies have focused on low-to-moderate intensity activities. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the SWA during high intensity exercise. Twenty (ten males, ten females) endurance trained subjects, 24.3 (±2.8) years of age, performed three 10-min treadmill runs at 65, 75, and 85% of their VO2max each and also ran outside for 30 min at their preferred speed. Energy expenditure was measured with the SWA (software version 6.1) and a portable indirect calorimetry system (Jaeger Oxycon Mobile®). The SWA showed a ceiling effect around an intensity of ten METs. Since all subjects exceeded that intensity range during the exercise trials, the SWA significantly underestimated energy expenditure at high intensities. The intra-individual correlations between MET values calculated by the SWA and values derived from the Oxycon, however, were significant for all but two subjects (r = 0.390–0.933, mean = 0.66 ± 0.25). While providing accurate results for energy expenditure during low-to-moderate intensity physical activities, the SWA does not provide accurate estimates of energy expenditure at high intensity levels. The threshold for accurate measurements seems to be around an intensity of ten METs.
References
Ainslie P, Reilly T, Westerterp K (2003) Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water. Sports Med 33(9):683–698
Beashel P, Taylor J (eds) (1996) Advanced studies in physical education and sports. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham
Calabró MA, Welk GJ, Eisenmann JC (2009) Validation of the SenseWear Pro Armband algorithms in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1714–1720
Corder K, Brage S, Ekelund U (2007) Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:597–603
Foss Ø, Hallén J (2005) Validity and stability of a computerized metabolic system with mixing chamber. Int J Sports Med 26(7):569–575
Fruin ML, Rankin JW (2004) Validity of a multi-sensor armband in estimating rest and exercise energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(6):1063–1069
King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ (2004) Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(7):1244–1251
Koehler K, deMarees M, Braun H, Schaenzer W (2010) Comparison of two portable devices for assessing energy expenditure during high-intensity running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(5 Suppl): S304–S305
Malavolti M, Pietrobelli A, Dugoni M, Poli M, Romagnoli E, De Cristofaro P, Battistini NC (2007) A new device for measuring resting energy expenditure (REE) in healthy subjects. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 17(5):338–343
Malina RM (1995) Anthropometry. In: Maud PJ, Foster C (eds) Physiological assessment of human fitness. Human Kinetics, Champaign
St-Onge M, Mignault D, Allison DB, Rabasa-Lhoret R (2007) Evaluation of a portable device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults. Am J Clin Nutr 85:742–749
Troiano RP (2005) A timely meeting: objective measurement of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(11):S487–S489
Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D (2000) Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 71(2 Suppl):S59–S73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Klaas Westerterp.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drenowatz, C., Eisenmann, J.C. Validation of the SenseWear Armband at high intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 883–887 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1695-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1695-0