Skip to main content
Log in

Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0–1 and 3–7 Hz

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the relation between visual feedback gain and variability in force and whether visual gain-induced changes in force variability were associated with frequency-specific force oscillations and changes in the neural activation of the agonist muscle. Fourteen young adults (19–29 years) were instructed to accurately match the target force at 2 and 10% of their maximal voluntary contraction with abduction of the index finger. Force was maintained at specific visual feedback gain levels that varied across trials. Each trial lasted 20 s and the amount of visual feedback was varied by changing the visual gain from 0.5 to 1,474 pixels/N (13 levels; equals ~0.001–4.57°). Force variability was quantified as the standard deviation of the detrended force data. The neural activation of the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) was measured with surface electromyography. The mean force did not vary significantly with the amount of visual feedback. In contrast, force variability decreased from low gains compared to moderate gains (0.5–4 pixels/N: 0.09 ± 0.04 vs. 64–1,424 pixels/N: 0.06 ± 0.02 N). The decrease in variability was predicted by a decrease in the power of force oscillations from 0–1 Hz (~50%) and 3–7 Hz (~20%). The activity of the FDI muscle did not vary across the visual feedback gains. These findings demonstrate that in young adults force variability can be decreased with increased visual feedback gain (>64 pixels/N vs. 0.5–4 pixels/N) due to a decrease in the power of oscillations in the force from 0–1 and 3–7 Hz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baweja HS, Kennedy DM, Vu JL, Vaillancourt DE, Christou EA (2009a) Greater amounts of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduce force variability during constant isometric contractions. Society for Neuroscience, Chicago, IL

  • Baweja HS, Patel BK, Martinkewiz JD, Vu J, Christou EA (2009b) Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res 197:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P (2000) Cortical drives to human muscle: the Piper and related rhythms. Prog Neurobiol 60:97–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chao EYS, An KN, Cooney WP, Linschied RL (1989) Biomechanics of the hand. A basic research study. World Scientific Publishing, Teaneck

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA (2005) Visual feedback attenuates force fluctuations induced by a stressor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:2126–2133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Jakobi JM, Critchlow A, Fleshner M, Enoka RM (2004) The 1- to 2-Hz oscillations in muscle force are exacerbated by stress, especially in older adults. J Appl Physiol 97:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ, Erim Z (1994) Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoka RM, Fuglevand AJ (2001) Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve 24(1):4–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falcke M (2003) Buffers and oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. Biophys J 84:28–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farina D, Fattorini L, Felici F, Filligoi G (2002) Nonlinear surface EMG analysis to detect changes of motor unit conduction velocity and synchronization. J Appl Physiol 93(5):224–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2004) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96:1486–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulks ER, Baweja HS, Patel BK, Martinkewiz JD, Srinivasan D, Christou EA (2008) Breathing amplitude influences force variability but not muscle activity during constant isometric contractions. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Homma T, Sakai T (1991) Ramification pattern of intermetacarpal branches of the deep branch (ramus profundus) of the ulnar nerve in the human hand. Acta Anat (Basel) 141:139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SL, Newell KM (2008) Visual information gain and the regulation of constant force levels. Exp Brain Res 189:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter SK, Taijin T, Patel B, Rodriguez TM, Christou EA (2007) Heart rate contributes to the low-frequency oscillations in force. Society for Neuroscience, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Yasuda N (2007) Forced ventilation increases variability of isometric finger forces. Neurosci Lett 412:243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZM, Pfaeffle HJ, Sotereanos DG, Goitz RJ, Woo SL (2003) Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18:908–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1993) Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. J Mot Behav 25:53–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz CT, Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005) Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93:2449–2459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prodoehl J, Vaillancourt DE (2009) Effects of visual gain on force control at the elbow and ankle. Exp Brain Res [Epub ahead of print]

  • Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2000) Variability and noise in continuous force production. J Mot Behav 32:141–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slifkin AB, Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2000) Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. J Neurophysiol 84:1708–1718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006a) Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61:P117–P124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006b) Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force. Exp Brain Res 170:423–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Valantine AD, Newell KM (2006) Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels. Neurosci Lett 392:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Christou EA, Enoka RM (2003) Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 90:1350–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy BL (2007) Visuomotor contribution to force variability in the plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles. Hum Mov Sci 26:796–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy BL, Dinenno DV, Jorgensen B, Welsh SJ (2007) Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:469–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DL (2002) Expiratory resistive loaded breathing in humans increases fluctuations of force production in submaximal isometric quadriceps contractions. Neurosci Lett 328:13–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Larsson L, Newell KM (2003) Effects of aging on force variability, single motor unit discharge patterns, and the structure of 10, 20, and 40 Hz EMG activity. Neurobiol Aging 24:25–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh SJ, Dinenno DV, Tracy BL (2007) Variability of quadriceps femoris motor neuron discharge and muscle force in human aging. Exp Brain Res 179:219–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by R01 NS52318 and R01 NS58487 to David E. Vaillancourt and R01 AG031769 to Evangelos A. Christou.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos A. Christou.

Additional information

Communicated by Fausto Baldissera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baweja, H.S., Kennedy, D.M., Vu, J. et al. Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0–1 and 3–7 Hz. Eur J Appl Physiol 108, 935–943 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1301-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1301-5

Keywords

Navigation