Skip to main content
Log in

Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to examine in free-living individuals from a high-density city (1) the objectively determined physical activity levels across quartiles derived from pedometer step counts, (2) the pedometer steps day−1 required to meet health-enhancing guidelines of accruing 30 min day−1 of moderate physical activity and (3) the agreement between three objective criteria for the pedometer guidelines. Over 7 days 49 Hong Kong Chinese aged 15–55 years (n = 30 males) wore a polar heart rate monitor (HRM), an MTI and Tritrac accelerometer, plus a Yamax pedometer for ≥600 min day−1. Participants averaged 9,839 ± 3,088 steps day−1, whilst accumulating 44.5 ± 22.6, 43.1 ± 21.7, and 24.7 ± 19.3 min day−1 of moderate physical activity by the Tritrac, MTI and HRM, respectively. Significant differences between quartiles of pedometer-determined activity were predominantly seen in the accelerometry data, especially during moderate and moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity (effect sizes >1.5 between upper and lower quartiles), but not seen in the HRM data. Using both criterion accelerometer datasets, a threshold of 8,000 steps day−1 accurately categorized ~90% of those achieving, and ~80% of those not achieving, 30 min day−1 of appropriate activity. They also produced a screening sensitivity of ~95% and a specificity of ~70%, which were considerably higher than those from the HRM data. Overall, the agreement between the three criterion measures suggests 8,000 steps day−1 might be a valid screening tool as a proxy for classifying those meeting public health physical activity recommendations of 30 min day−1 of moderate activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth BE, Bassett DR Jr, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O’Brien WL, Thompson RW, Jones DA, Macera CA, Kimsey CD (2000) Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S457–S464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR Jr (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S30–S36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder S (2001) Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S379–S399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bland M (1987) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers T, Nestle M, McTiernan A, Doyle C, Currie-Williams A, Gansler T, Thun M (2002) American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 52:92–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerin E, Macfarlane DJ, Ko H-H, Chan AK-C (2007) Measuring perceived neighbourhood walkability in densely-populated urban areas in Asia. Cities 24:204–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W (2006) Many pathways from land use to health. J Am Plann Assoc 72:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedson PS, Miller K (2000) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S21–S29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:777–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 116:1081–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howley ET (2001) Type of activity: resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S364–S369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janz KF (2002) Use of heart rate monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ (2004) Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1244–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok P, Tse LY (2004) Overweight and obesity in Hong Kong—what do we know? Public Health Epidemiol Bull 13:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masurier GC, Sidman CL, Corbin CB (2003) Accumulating 10, 000 steps: does this meet current physical activity guidelines? Res Q Exerc Sport 74:389–394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders NY, Sherman WM, Nagaraja HN, Kien CL (2001) Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1233–1240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane DJ, Lee CY, Ho EYK, Chan KL, Chan D (2006) Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life. J Appl Physiol 101:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan DT (2007) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport 10:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews CE (2005) Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S512–S522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA (1996) Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau KL, Degarmo R, Langley J, McMahon C, Howley ET, Bassett DR Jr, Thompson DL (2001) Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1825–1831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Sarkin JA, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ (1999) Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:908–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips WT, Pruitt LA, King AC (1996) Lifestyle activity. Current recommendations. Sports Med 22:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, Despres J-P, Dishman RK, Franklin BA, Garber CE (1998) American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:975–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeau F (2005) Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 146:732–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr (2004) How many steps/days are enough: preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 34:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM (2001) Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 72:1–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE (2002) Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:2045–2051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Reis JP, Kimsey CD Jr (2004) Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1567–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK (2005) How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med 40:293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ (2005) Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S501–S511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000) A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S489–S497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams E, Klesges RC, Hanson CL, Eck LH (1989) A prospective study of the reliability and convergent validity of three physical activity measures in a field research trial. J Clin Epidemiol 42:1161–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka M, Ayabe M, Yahiro T, Higuchi H, Higaki Y, St-Amand J, Miyazaki H, Yoshitake Y, Shindo M, Tanaka H (2005) Long-period accelerometer monitoring shows the role of physical activity in overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 29:502–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JG, Ohta T, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Miyashita M (2003) Effects of daily activity recorded by pedometer on peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), ventilatory threshold and leg extension power in 30- to 69-year-old Japanese without exercise habit. Eur J Appl Physiol 90:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Technical assistance was provided by the generous loan of several MTI accelerometers from Dr Michael Sjostrom, Karolinska Institute, Sweden. No external financial assistance was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duncan James Macfarlane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macfarlane, D.J., Chan, D., Chan, K.L. et al. Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals. Eur J Appl Physiol 104, 435–444 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0789-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0789-4

Keywords

Navigation