Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in multi-segmented body movements and EMG activity while standing on firm and foam support surfaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postural control ensures stability during both static posture and locomotion by initiating corrective adjustments in body movement. This is particularly important when the conditions of the support surface change. We investigated the effects of standing on a compliant foam surface using 12 normal subjects (mean age 26 years) in terms of: linear movements at the head, shoulder, hip and knee; EMG activity of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles and torques towards the support surface. As subjects repeated the trials with eyes open or closed, we were also able to determine the effects of vision on multi-segmented body movements during standing upon different support surface conditions. As expected, EMG activity, torque variance values and body movements at all measured positions increased significantly when standing on foam compared with the firm surface. Linear knee and hip movements increased more, relative to shoulder and head movements while standing on foam. Vision stabilized the head and shoulder movements more than hip and knee movements while standing on foam support surface. Moreover, vision significantly reduced the tibialis anterior EMG activity and torque variance during the trials involving foam. In conclusion, the foam support surface increased corrective muscle and torque activity, and changed the firm-surface multi-segmented body movement pattern. Vision improved the ability of postural control to handle compliant surface conditions. Several essential features of postural control have been found from recording movements from multiple points on the body, synchronized with recording torque and EMG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allum JH, Adkin AL, Carpenter MG, Held-Ziolkowska M, Honegger F, Pierchala K (2001) Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of a unilateral vestibular deficit. Gait Posture 14:227–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allum JH, Zamani F, Adkin AL, Ernst A (2002) Differences between trunk sway characteristics on a foam support surface and on the equitest ankle-sway-referenced support surface. Gait Posture 16:264–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn JT, Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM (2003) Kinematic analysis of the hip and trunk during bilateral stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial support surfaces. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18:655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt T (1991) Vertigo-Its multisensory syndromes. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsöö S (1961) The static muscle load in different work positions: an electromyographic study. Ergonomics 4:193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AS (1946) Body sway and vision. J Exp Psychol 36:526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransson PA (2005) Analysis of adaptation in human postural control. In: Lund (ed) Clinical sciences. Lund Medical faculty, University of Lund, Sweden, p 204

  • Gage WH, Winter DA, Frank JS, Adkin AL (2004) Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait Posture 19:124–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill J, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Held-Ziolkowska M, Adkin AL, Honegger F, Pierchala K (2001) Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M438–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeka J, Kiemel T, Creath R, Horak F, Peterka R (2004) Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration. J Neurophysiol 92:2368–2379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson R, Magnusson M (1991) Human postural dynamics. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:413–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Vallbo AB (1980) Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res 184:353–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP (1998) The plantar sole is a ‘dynamometric map’ for human balance control. Neuroreport 9:3247–3252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Gilhodes J, Roll R, Roll J (1999) From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing? Exp Brain Res 124(1):80–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll J (2001) Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol 532(Pt3):869–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristinsdottir EK, Fransson PA, Magnusson M (2001) Changes in postural control in healthy elderly subjects are related to vibration sensation, vision and vestibular asymmetry. Acta Otolaryngol 121:700–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loram ID, Maganaris CN, Lakie M (2004) Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing. J Physiol 556:683–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loram ID, Maganaris CN, Lakie M (2005) Human postural sway results from frequent, ballistic bias impulses by soleus and gastrocnemius. J Physiol 564:295–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26:59–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka H, Mita K, Watakabe M, Akataki K, Suzuki N, Okuwa T, Yabe K (2002) Age-related changes in the interactive mobility of the hip and knee joints: a geometrical analysis. Gait Posture 15:236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus WM, Straube A, Brandt T (1984) Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain 107(Pt4):1143–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry S, McIllroy W, Maki B (2000) The role of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the control of compensatory stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable, multi-directional perturbation. Brain Res 877(2):401–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proakis J, Manolakis D (1989) Introduction to digital signal processing. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM (2003) Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action shown during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren KS, Rajendran K, Contakos J, Chuang LL, Peterson M, Doyle R, McAuley E (2007) Changing control strategies during standard assessment using computerized dynamic posturography with older women. Gait Posture 25:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stal F, Fransson PA, Magnusson M, Karlberg M (2003) Effects of hypothermic anesthesia of the feet on vibration-induced body sway and adaptation. J Vestib Res 13:39–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel JP, Roll JP (1982) Response to pressure and vibration of slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human foot. Neurosci Lett 34:289–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrancken AM, Allum JH, Peller M, Visser JE, Esselink RA, Speelman JD, Siebner HR, Bloem BR (2005) Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on balance and finger control in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 252:1487–1494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vuillerme N, Pinsault N, Vaillant J (2005) Postural control during quiet standing following cervical muscular fatigue: effects of changes in sensory inputs. Neurosci Lett 378:135–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (1995) Gray’s anatomy. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Chiang JH (1997) The significance of somatosensory stimulations to the human foot in the control of postural reflexes. Exp Brain Res 114:163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the Swedish Medical Research Council (grant nr. 17x-05693) and the Medical Faculty, Lund University, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Fransson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fransson, P.A., Gomez, S., Patel, M. et al. Changes in multi-segmented body movements and EMG activity while standing on firm and foam support surfaces. Eur J Appl Physiol 101, 81–89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0476-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0476-x

Keywords

Navigation