Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of treadmill-based equations of two commonly used uniaxial accelerometers to estimate energy expenditure (EE) during activities of daily living in children. Twelve subjects with mean (SD) age11.4 (0.4) years engaged in a choreographed routine consisting of three activities (sweeping, bowling, and basketball) of 4min duration while wearing a Manufacturing Technology, Inc. (MTI) accelerometer, Caltrac accelerometer, and a portable gas analyzer (Cosmed K4b2). The equations of Trost et al. and Sallis et al. were used to convert activity counts to estimations of EE for the MTI and Caltrac, respectively. Correlation coefficients between Caltrac predictions of EE and measured EE from indirect calorimetry ranged from r=0.22 to 0.72 for individual activities. Correlations between MTI EE predictions and indirect calorimetry ranged from r=0.50 to 0.68 for individual activities. When the activities were pooled the correlations between EE from uniaxial accelerometers and EE from indirect calorimetry were moderately strong (MTI, r=0.78 and Caltrac, r=0.82). Inter-accelerometer (counts min−1) correlations were 0.08, −0.54, 0.63, and 0.79 for sweeping, bowling, basketball, and pooled data, respectively. The overall mean difference, or bias, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each uniaxial accelerometer compared to indirect calorimetry were as follows: Caltrac, bias = 2.80 (2.36, 3.24) kcal min−1; MTI, bias = 0.88 (0.23, 1.53) kcal min−1. Both accelerometers significantly underestimated measured EE (P<0.05). Uniaxial accelerometers provide potential for the measurement of physical activity (PA) and EE in children. Future studies refining accelerometry predictions of PA and EE are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, McKay HA (1996) Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 24:233–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32 [Suppl]:S471–S480

  • Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA (1998) Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. N Engl J Med 338:1650–1656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray MS, Morrow JR, Pivarnik JM, Bricker JT (1992) Caltrac validity for estimating energy expenditure with children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 4:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Casperson CJ, Nixon PA, DuRant RH (1998) Physical activity epidemiology applied to children and adolescents. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 26:341–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann JC, Brisko N, Shadrick D, Welsh S (2003) Comparative analysis of the Cosmed Quark b2 and K4b2 gas analysis systems. J Sports Med Phys Fit 43:150–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A, Poorvliet E, Nilsson A, Froberg K, Wedderkopp N, Westerterp K (2001) Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:275–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Ingledew DK (1998) Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of children’s activities. J Appl Physiol 84:362–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedson PS, Sirard J, Debold N (1997) Validity of two physical activity monitors in children and adolescents. In: Welsman JR (ed) Children and exercise XIX. Spon, London, pp 127–131

  • Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000) Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32 [Suppl]:S442–S449

  • Johnson RK, Russ J, Goran MI (1998) Physical activity related energy expenditure in children by doubly labeled water as compared with the Caltrac accelerometer. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:1046–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Louie L, Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Keung Tong K, Ingledew DK, Fu FH (1999) Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for estimating the energy cost of activity in Hong Kong Chinese boys. Pediatr Exerc Sci 11:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliszewski AF, Freedson PS, Ebbeling CJ, Crussemeyer J, Kastango KB (1991) Validity of the Caltrac accelerometer in estimating energy expenditure and activity in children and adults. Pediatr Exerc Sci 3:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, Bassett DR, Ainsworth BA (2001) Validation of the Cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 22:280–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ (2000) Introduction: evaluation of some measurements of physical activity and energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S439–S441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power C, Lake JK, Cole TJ (1997) Measurement and long-term health risks of child and adolescent fatness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 21:507–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puyua MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF (2002) Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 10:150–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Buono MJ, Roby JJ, Carlson D, Neson JA (1990) The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:698–703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, Swartz AM, Thompson DL (2001) Simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique to estimate energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:2118–2123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Jr, Thompson DL, Swartz AM (2002) Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:888–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR, O’Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE (2000) Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32 [Suppl]:S450–456

  • Trost SG (2001) Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: current issues, future directions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 29:32–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR (1998) Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:629–633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical Activity and Health: a report of the surgeon general. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000) A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S489–S497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by a College of Health Sciences Summer Seed Grant from the University of Wyoming awarded to Dr. Joey C. Eisenmann.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joey C. Eisenmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenmann, J.C., Strath, S.J., Shadrick, D. et al. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children. Eur J Appl Physiol 91, 259–263 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0983-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0983-3

Keywords

Navigation