Skip to main content
Log in

The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To systematically analyse evidence on the incremental effect of work-related psychosocial risk factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders, as reported in longitudinal studies.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in three data bases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO) until May 2009. The quality assessment leading to a methodological quality score of the included studies was conducted by two independent reviewers using a standardised checklist. Criteria for the evaluation of evidence were established. Heterogeneity analyses were conducted.

Results

Altogether 18 prospective longitudinal studies were included in the analysis. Potential psychosocial risk factors were mainly based on the job demand control (support) model by Karasek (1998). Study results were too heterogeneous to deduce pooled risk estimates. But the weight of evidence was strong for an incremental effect of job demands, job control, social support, and job strain, on the development of neck and/or shoulder disorders.

Conclusion

While we found evidence for an incremental effect of different psychosocial work factors (in addition to the effect of physical job factors), these results have to be interpreted carefully in order to support the notion that psychological factors can have an independent causal influence on the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Nevertheless, our findings are important for the development of preventive strategies, as they stress the need for preventive approaches that tackle both physical and psychosocial factors. Future research is warranted to consolidate and strengthen the results of this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen JH, Kaergaard A, Mikkelsen S, Jensen U, Frost P, Bonde J, Fallentin N, Thomsen J (2003) Risk factors in the onset of neck/shoulder pain in a prospective study of workers in industrial and service companies. Occup Environ Med 60:649–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen JH, Haahr JP, Frost P (2007) Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms: a two year prospective study of a general working population. Arthritis Rheuma 56:1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariëns G, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G (2000) Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 26:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariëns G, Bongers PM, Hoogendoorn WE, Houtman IL, van der Wal G, van Mechelen W (2001) High quantitative job demands and low coworker support as risk factors for neck pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 26:1896–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard BP (ed) (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. NIOSH Publication Number 97–141. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongers PM, Kremer AM, ter Laak J (2002) Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist? A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med 41:315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM (2006) Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil 16:279–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LP, Andersen JH, Lassen CF, Kryger A, Overgaard E, Vilstrup I, Mikkelsen S (2004) Neck and shoulder symptoms and disorders among Danish computer workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 30:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) (2009) Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS) (ISBN 978-3-88261-129-8) 204 (table TF04)

  • Cassou B, Derriennic F, Monfort C, Norton J, Touranchet A (2002) Chronic neck and shoulder pain, age, and working conditions: longitudinal results from a large random sample in France. Occup Environ Med 59:537–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti E, Bakker AB (2011) The job demands-resources model: challenges for future research. SA J Ind Psychol/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 37(2):974–983. doi:10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltayeb S, Bart Staal JB, Hassan A, de Bie RA (2009) Work related risk factors for neck, shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among Dutch computer office workers. J Occup Rehabil 19:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feveile H, Jensen C, Burr H (2002) Risk factors for neck-shoulder and wrist-hand symptoms in a 5-year follow up study of 3,990 employees in Denmark. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Stern H (2006) The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. Am Stat 60:328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DA, Schultz KF (2008) Making sense of odds and odds ratios. Obstet Gynecol 111(2 Pt 1):423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grooten WJ, Wiktorin C, Norrman L, Josephson M, Tornqvist EW, Alfredsson L, MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group (2004) Seeking care for neck/shoulder pain: a prospective study of work-related risk factors in a healthy population. Occup Environ Med 46:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberg-van Reenen HH, Ariëns GA, Blatter BM, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM (2007) A systematic review of the relation between physical capacity and future low back and neck/shoulder pain. Pain 130:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcombe H, McBride D, Derrett S, Gray A (2010) Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in New Zealand nurses, postal workers and office workers. Inj Prev 16:96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness EF, Macfarlane GJ, Nahit ES, Silman AJ, McBeth J (2003) Mechanical and psychosocial factors predict new onset shoulder pain: a prospective cohort study of newly employed workers. Occup Environ Med 60:850–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington JM, Carter JT, Birrell L, Gompertz D (1998) Surveillance case definitions for work related upper limb pain syndromes. Occup Environ Med 55:264–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill A (1965) Environment and disease: association or causation? Proc Royal Soc Med 58:295–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (2000) Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 25:2114–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston V, Jimmieson NL, Jull G, Souvlis T (2009) Contribution of individual, workplace, psychosocial and physiological factors to neck pain in female office workers. Eur J Pain 13:985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C (2005) Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the “BIT” follow up study on office workers. Occup Environ Med 62:188–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek RA (1998) Demand/control model: a social, emotional, and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior development. In: Stellman JM (ed) ILO encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. ILO, Geneva

  • Karasek RA, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York

  • Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3:322–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen T, Ketola R, Toivonen R, Luukkonen R, Häkkänen M, Viikari-Juntura E (2003) Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup Environ Med 60:475–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijpers T, van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM (2004) Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 109(3):420–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, Jørgensen K (1987) Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc A, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I, Landre MF, Roquelaure Y, Study Group on Repetitive Work (2004) Incidence of shoulder pain in repetitive work. Occup Environ Med 61:39–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroux I, Brisson C, Montreuil S (2006) Job strain and neck-shoulder symptoms: a prevalence study of women and men white-collar workers. Occup Med 56(2):102–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeberg SI, Rosvall M, Choi B, Canivet C, Isacsson SO, Karasek R, Ostergren PO (2011) Psychosocial working conditions and exhaustion in a working population sample of Swedish middle-aged men and women. Eur J Public Health 21:190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton SJ (1995) An overview of psychosocial and behavioral factors in neck-and-shoulder pain. Scand J Rehabil Med (Suppl) 32:67–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linton SJ (2000) A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25(9):1148–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane GJ, Pallewatte N, Paudyal P, Blyth FM, Coggon D, Crombez G, Linton S, Leino-Arjas P, Silman AJ, Smeets RJ, van der Windt D (2009) EULAR evaluation of work-related psychosocial factors and regional musculoskeletal pain. Ann Rheum Dis 68:885–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer J, Kraus T, Ochsmann E (2012) Longitudinal evidence for the association between work-related physical exposures and neck and/or shoulder complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85(6):587–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda H, Viikari-Juntura E, Martikainen R, Takala EP, Riihimäki H (2001) A prospective study of work related factors and physical exercise as predictors of shoulder pain. Occup Environ Med 58:528–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(6):e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östergren PO, Hanson BS, Balogh I, Ektor-Andersen J, Isacsson A, Orbaek P, Winkel J, Isacsson SO, Malmö Shoulder Neck Study Group (2005) Incidence of shoulder and neck pain in a working population: effect modification between mechanical and psychosocial exposures at work? Results from a one year follow up of the Malmö shoulder and neck study cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer KT, Smedley J (2007) Work relatedness of chronic neck pain with physical findings—a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 33:165–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettiti D (1999) Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine, 2nd edn (Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics). Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN-10: 0195133641

  • Rothman K (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp 7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM (2002) A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Occup Environ Med 59:664–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MH (2001) Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health (Suppl) 1:1–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CK, Silverstein BA, Fan ZJ, Bao S, Johnson PW (2009) Psychosocial factors and shoulder symptom development among workers. Am J Ind Med 52:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkoff AM, Le R, Geiger-Brown J, Lipscomb J, Lang G (2006) Longitudinal relationship of work hours, mandatory overtime, and on-call to musculoskeletal problems in nurses. Am J Ind Med 49:964–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel SG, van der Beek AJ, Blatter BM, Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM (2005) Psychosocial work characteristics in relation to neck and upper limb symptoms. Pain 114:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Windt DA, Thomas E, Pope DP, de Winter AF, Macfarlane GJ, Bouter LM, Silman AJ (2000) Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 57:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijn RM, Huisstede BM, Koes BW, Burdorf A (2010) Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the shoulder—a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Work Environ Health 36:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vašková R (2007) Teamwork and high performance work organisation. Eur foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. ID: TN0507TR01

  • Wahlström J, Burström L, Hagberg M, Lundström R, Nilsson T (2008) Musculoskeletal symptoms among young male workers and associations with exposure to hand-arm vibration and ergonomic stressors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Bone K, Cooper C (2005) Hard work never hurt anyone: or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft-tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb. Ann Rheum Diss 64:1391–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Bone KE, Palmer KT, Reading I, Cooper C (2003) Soft-tissue rheumatic disorders of the neck and upper limb: prevalence and risk factors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 33:185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This review was conducted as a by-product of another study, sponsored by the German Accident Insurance (Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, DGUV). The authors would like to thank Dr. Rolf Ellegast for his support during this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Ochsmann.

Appendix

Appendix

Explanation of the methodological criteria from Table 1

A

Positive if at least two demographic factors out of age, gender, profession are clearly defined

B

Positive if either inclusion or exclusion criteria for the baseline population are presented

C

Positive if the total number of participants was ≥60% on the last point of follow-up compared to the number of participants at baseline

D

Positive if demographic/clinical information (patient/disease characteristics such as age, sex and other potential prognostic predictors) was presented for those lost to follow-up/drop-outs

E

Positive if the follow-up period was at least 3 months

F

Positive if clinical diagnosis was assessed

G

Positive if standardised questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up were applied for outcome measurement

H

Positive if objective outcome measurements are applied (clinical examination, clinical tests, X-ray)

I

Positive if standardised questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up were applied for psychosocial risk factors

J

Positive if standardised questionnaires at baseline and follow-up were applied for physical risk factors

K

Positive if objective assessment of physical exposure is conducted (video analysis, weight definition)

L

Positive if the data presentation fits to the stated method

M

Positive if univariate/multivariate models are presented by means of relative risks, rate ratios, odds ratios or hazard ratios

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kraatz, S., Lang, J., Kraus, T. et al. The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86, 375–395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0848-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0848-y

Keywords

Navigation