Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages of the JobReha discharge letter: an instrument for improving the communication interface in occupational rehabilitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Systematic collaboration between occupational physicians (OPs) and rehabilitation physicians (RPs) can improve occupational rehabilitation processes and outcomes. The JobReha discharge letter (JR-DL) is a key element of JobReha, a multilevel intervention for specific occupational rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. This feasibility study aims to analyse the perceived benefit and acceptance of the JR-DL as an instrument for improving the communication interface between RPs and OPs.

Methods

On the day of discharge from rehabilitation, the rehabilitation physician completed a JR-DL form containing relevant information on the rehabilitation measures undertaken during treatment and recommendations for return to work. The JR-DL was either transmitted to the patient’s occupational physician directly or given to the patients to bring to the OP to support the reintegration process. The JR-DL as an instrument for improving the communication interface was evaluated using data from patient questionnaires (n = 250), JR-DLs (n = 247), OP questionnaires (n = 224) and RP questionnaires (n = 232).

Results

All rehabilitation physicians sent a JR-DL to the respective occupational physician on the day of discharge. OPs received the reports a median 2 days after discharge. The content quality and relevance of the JR-DL for the reintegration process were rated high to moderate by more than 97.0 % of the OPs; 92.3 % of the patients received a recommendation to return to their previous workplace; 43.3 % returned with minor limitation; and the remaining 31.6 % with a recommendation for individual reintegration; 74.0 % of the workers returned to work within 3 days of discharge.

Conclusions

Use of the JR-DL for the improvement of communication and exchange of relevant information is feasible and supportive for both rehabilitation and occupational physicians. Its positive impact on reintegration and return to work was apparent. Delays in receipt of the JR-DL should be eliminated by appropriate quality assurance measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As discharge from rehabilitation was usually on a Friday or Saturday and return to work on the following Monday, there generally was not enough time for regular postal delivery.

  2. 200 complete data sets based on data from the OP and RP questionnaires were available for analysis.

References

  • Ammendolia C, Cassidy D, Steenstra I, Soklaridis S, Boyle E, Eng S, Howard H, Bhupinder B, Cote P (2009) Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:65. Internet: htpp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/65

  • Bethge M, Müller-Fahrnow W (2008) Wirksamkeit einer intensivierten stationären Rehabilitation bei muskuloskelettalen Erkrankungen: Systematischer Review und Meta-analyse. Rehabilitation 47:200–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BKK (2010) Gesundheitsreport: Gesundheit in einer älter werdenden Gesellschaft. In: Bundesverband BKK (ed) Kronprinzenstraße 6, 45128 Essen. Schröers Druck Essen

  • Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Cameron J, Hillage J (2010) Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 32(8):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole C, Watson PJ, Drummond A (2010) Low back pain patient’s experiences of work modifications; a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:277. Internet:htpp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/277

  • Crook J, Millner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B (2002) Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 12:277–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denner A (1997) Analyse und Training der wirbelsäulenstabilisierenden Muskulatur, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Franche Rl, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J (2005) The Institute for Work and Health (IWH) Workplace based RTW Intervention Literature Review Research Team: workplace based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 15:607–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel H (2001) Epidemiologie und Kosten chronischer Schmerzen. Schmerz 15:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenbrunner C, Schwarze M (2011) JobReha—bedarfsgerechte arbeitsplatzbezogene rehabilitation: systematische Modellentwicklung. Phys Med Rehabil Kuror 21:234–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase I, Riedl G, Birkholz LB, Schaefer A, Zellner M (2002) Verzahnung von medizinischer Rehabilitation und beruflicher Reintegration. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 37:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann B, Spallek M (2009) Arbeitsbezogene Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen—eine Gegenstandsbestimmung. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 44:423–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse B, Heuer J, Gebauer R (2008) Rehabilitation aus der Sicht kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen: Wissen, Wertschätzung und Kooperationsmöglichkeiten—Ergebnisse des KoRB Projektes. Rehabilitation 47:324–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manecke IA, Spallek M, Rebe T, Wrbitzky R, Gutenbrunner C, Ristel N, Schwarze M (2008) Das Modellprojekt “JobReha”—Hintergrund und Praxisbericht. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 43:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Fahrnow W, Greitemann B, Radoschewski FM, Gerwinn H, Hansmeier T (2005) Berufliche Orientierung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation und Leistungen zur Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben. Rehabilitation 44:32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raspe H, Kohlmann T (1998) Die aktuelle Rückenschmerz-Epidemie. In: Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J (eds) Chronischer Rückenschmerz. Wege aus dem Dilemma. Huber Verlag, Bern, pp 20–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonstein E, Kenny D, Keating J, Koes B (2003) Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001822

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze M, Rebe T, Gutenbrunner C (2007) Arbeitsplatzorientierte Prävention und Rehabilitation “JobReha”—Konzeptentwicklung und erste Ergebnisse. Phys Med Rehabil Kuror 17:233–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze M, Ristel N, Rebe T, Wrbitzky R, Gutenbrunner C, Manecke I-A, Spallek M (2008) Schnittstellenmanagement in der “JobReha”-Notwendigkeit einer verbesserten Zusammenarbeit zwischen Betriebs- und Rehabilitationsärzten. Zbl Arbeitsmed 58:216–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze M, Rebe T, Korallus C, Spallek M, Gutenbrunner C (2012) JobReha—bedarfsgerechte arbeitsplatzbezogene Rehabilitation: Begleitevaluation der Implementierungsphase. Phy Med Rehabil Kuror (accepted)

  • Seidel H, Neuner R, Schochat T (2003) Betriebsarzt und medizinische Rehabilitation—eine Befragung von Betriebsärzten in Baden-Württemberg. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 38:228–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring H, Dvorak J, Dvorak V, Schneider W, Tritschler T, Villiger B (2008) Theorie und Praxis der Trainingstherapie, 3rd edn. Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R (2003) Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA 290:2443–2454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tjulin A, Stiwne E, Ekberg K (2009) Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J Occup Rehabil 19:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell G, Burton AK (2001) Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med 51:124–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler SW, Foeh KP, van Mark A, Touissant R, Sonntag N, Gaessler A, Schulze J, Kessel R (2009) Outpatient rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders using structured workplace descriptions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RM, Westmoreland M (2002) Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work 19:87–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the patients who participated in the JobReha project. We would also like to thank the many occupational and rehabilitation physicians who recruited participants and implemented the JobReha concept as well as the members of the working group who developed the JobReha programme: Dr. Thilo Busche, Martin Stumpf, Karin Roske, Nicole Noll, Markus Jähnke, Dr. Heinz-Hubert Daalmann, Heiko Wehe, Dr. Detlev Kasprowski, Thomas Henke, Anke Eisenhauer, Norbert Cordes, Norbert Giesen, Jürgen Rodewald, Albrecht Jacobs, Dr. Wilhelm Moesch and Thomas Schröder. This work was funded in part by the German pension insurance fund Brunswick-Hanover.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Spallek.

Additional information

M. Schwarze and M. Spallek contributed equally to this work.

Ethics approval: The Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School granted ethical approval for the study (No. 4436/06).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarze, M., Spallek, M., Korallus, C. et al. Advantages of the JobReha discharge letter: an instrument for improving the communication interface in occupational rehabilitation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86, 699–708 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0805-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0805-1

Keywords

Navigation