Skip to main content
Log in

Physical and psychosocial work stressors, health-related control beliefs and work ability: cross-sectional findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to analyse the cross-sectional associations between work-related stressors and work ability and to investigate moderator-type effects of internal health-related control beliefs (IHRCB).

Methods

A total of 1,348 working men and women aged 30–59 years from the baseline survey of the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees were included in the analyses. Work ability was assessed by the Work Ability Index (WAI). Work-related stressors were defined as physical demands and in terms of the demand–control model and the effort–reward imbalance model.

Results

Restrictions of work ability were explained independently by physical demands and by work stress exposure due to high demand and low control and due to effort–reward imbalance. These effects were more serious for workers with low IHRCB than those with high IHRCB.

Conclusions

IHRCB are an important personal resource that might moderate the effect of work-related stressors on work ability. However, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavinia SM, van Duivenbooden C, Burdorf A (2007) Influence of work-related factors and individual characteristics on work ability among Dutch construction workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 33(5):351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavinia SM, de Boer AG, van Duivenbooden JC, Frings-Dresen MH, Burdorf A (2009) Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occup Med (Lond) 59(1):32–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix AE, Bendix T, Haestrup C, Busch E (1998) A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 7(2):111–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bethge M, Radoschewski FM, Müller-Fahrnow W (2009) Work stress and work ability: cross-sectional findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees (SPE). Disabil Rehabil. doi:10.1080/09638280902751949

  • Chorpita BF, Barlow DH (1998) The development of anxiety: the role of control in the early environment. Psychol Bull 124(1):3–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte H (1999) Job insecurity and psychological well-being: review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 8(2):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden JC (2002) Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond) 52(4):177–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R (2007) Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): MR000008

  • Elfering A (2006) Work-related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S32–S43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldt T, Hyvonen K, Makikangas A, Kinnunen U, Kokko K (2009) Development trajectories of Finnish managers’ work ability over a 10-year follow-up period. Scand J Work Environ Health 35(1):37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes-Ferreira L, Peiro JM, Gonzalez-Morales MG, Martin I (2006) Work-related stress and well-being: the roles of direct action coping and palliative coping. Scand J Psychol 47(4):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fydrich T, Geyer M, Hessel A, Sommer G, Brähler E (1999) Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung an einer repräsentativen Stichprobe. Diagnostica 45(4):212–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen J (2009) Work ability - a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health 35(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda M, Lazarsfeld PF, Zeisel H (2002) Marienthal: the sociography of an unemployed community. Transaction Publ, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3(4):322–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohaus A, Schmitt GM (1989) Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Kontrollüberzeugungen zu Krankheit und Gesundheit (KKG). Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SM (1979) Controllability and human stress: method, evidence and theory. Behav Res Ther 17(4):287–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999) Classifying educational programmes: manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (2002) Epidemiology: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter JB (1975) Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. J Consult Clin Psychol 43(1):56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonstein E, Kenny DT, Keating J, Koes BW (2003) Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain. Spine 28(19):E391–E395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Speed FM, Milliken GA (1980) Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means. Am Stat 34(4):216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Asell M, Selander U, Millet P (2008) Internal locus of control and vocational rehabilitation. Work 30(2):149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1(1):27–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58(8):1483–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeld S, Candy B (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(6):443–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SC (1981) Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychol Bull 90(1):89–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi K, Eskelinen L, Toikkanen J, Jarvinen E, Ilmarinen J, Klockars M (1991) Work load and individual factors affecting work ability among aging municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 17(Suppl 1):128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi K, Huuhtanen P, Nykyri E, Ilmarinen J (2001) Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement. Occup Med (Lond) 51(5):318–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (2006) Arbeitsbewältigungsindex. Work Ability Index. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin

  • van den Berg TI, Alavinia SM, Bredt FJ, Lindeboom D, Elders LA, Burdorf A (2008) The influence of psychosocial factors at work and life style on health and work ability among professional workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81(8):1029–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A (2009) The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 66(4):211–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston KA (2005) The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales. J Health Psychol 10(5):623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R (1978) Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales. Health Educ Monogr 6(2):160–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF short version. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The German SPE and this research have been funded through the German Pension Fund (8011 – 106 - 31/31.27.6; according to § 31 Abs. 1 Nr. 5 SGB VI). We would like to thank our colleagues Yvonne Kasten and Susanne Bartel for their kind assistance and comments. Furthermore, we thank three anonymous reviewers for their hints and constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Bethge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bethge, M., Radoschewski, F.M. Physical and psychosocial work stressors, health-related control beliefs and work ability: cross-sectional findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83, 241–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0442-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0442-5

Keywords

Navigation