Abstract
Objectives
The assessment of job demands, a pivotal concept in the study of work stress, is often problematic. Part of the problem is that people differ in their perception of whether a given task is overly demanding, or merely a welcome challenge. This study address this problem by examining alternative response formats for job demands that include the respondents’ appreciation of this aspect. Another job stress dimension known to be important for health, leadership, was used for comparison and the association with health measures were examined.
Methods
A professionally homogenous group of 105-white collar workers participated in the study. A questionnaire assessing two job characteristics, demand and leadership, was used with four alternative response formats. The selected items were taken from the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (the QPSNordic). Five indices from the SF-36 were used to reflect physical and mental health. Part correlations, taken from a multiple regression procedure were used to elucidate the unique contribution of response format in the association with health variables.
Result
For the assessment of Demand, response formats that tapped the employee’s experience of the demands performed best. This was in contrast to Leadership scales, where an alternative response format did not contribute any unique information.
Conclusion
Insofar as interventions are aimed at improving worker’s health, it seems reasonable to recommend that the workers should also be asked if the job demands are actually experienced as overly demanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergström G, Jensen I, Fried I, Björklund C, Grahn A (2004) Work and health in the processing and engineering industries final report, part 1(in Swedish). Department of Clinical Neuroscience. Section for Personal Injury Prevention. The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm
Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM (2006) Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (Part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (Part II). J Occup Rehabil 16(3):279–302
Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Connolly JJ, Chockalingam V (2000) The role of affectivity in job satisfaction. a meta-analysis. Pers Individ Dif 29:265–281
Dallner M, Elo AL, Gamberale F, Hottinen V, Knardahl S, Lindström K et al (2000) Validation of the general nordic questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
de Jonge, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J (2000) Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee wellbeing: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 50:1317–1327
Edwards JR (2001) Ten difference score myths. Occup Res Methods 4:265–287
Edwards JR, Caplan RD, Van Harrison R (1998) Person-environment fit theory. In: Cooper CL (ed) Theories of organizational stress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 28–67
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2002). How to tackle psychosocial issues and reduce work-related stress. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg
European Commission (2000) Guidance on the work-related stress-spice of life or kiss of death? Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg
Faragher EB, Cass M, Cooper CL (2005) The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 62:105–112
Faragher EB, Cooper CL, Cartwright S (2004) A shortened stress evaluation tool (ASSET). Stress Health 20:189–201
Johns G (1981) Difference score measures of organizational-behavior variables—a critique. Organ Behav Hum Perform 27:443–463
Judge TA, Church A (2000) Job satisfaction: research and practice. In: Cooper CL, Locke EA (eds) Industrial and organizational psychology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 166–198
Judge TA, Heller D, Mount MK (2002) Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 87:530–541
Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3:322–355
Kristensen TS, Bjorner JB, Christensen KB, Borg V (2004) The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands at work. Work Stress 18:305–322
Locke E (1969) What is job satisfaction? Organ Behav Hum Perform 4:309–336
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
Oshagbemi T (1999) Overall job satisfaction: how good are single versus multiple-item measures? J Manage Psychol 14:388–403
Rick J, Briner RB, Daniels K, Perryman S, Guppy A (2001) A critical review of psychosocial hazard measures. Contract research report 356. The Institute for Employment Studies for the Health and Safety Executive, Brighton
Siegrist J (1998) Adverse health effects of effort-reward imbalance at work. In: Cooper CL (ed) Theories of organizational stress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 190–204
Siegrist J, Peter R (1994) Job stressors and cooping characteristics in work related diseases: issues of validity. Work Stress 8:130–140
Sparks K, Cooper CL (1999) Occupational differences in the work–strain relationship: towards the use of situation-specific models. J Occup Organ Psychol 72:219–229
Sparks K, Faragher B, Cooper CL (2001) Well-being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. J Occup Organ Psychol 74:489–509
SPSS Inc (2005) SPSS 14 for Windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago
Stansfeld S, Candy B (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:443–462
Steenland K, Johnson J, Nowlin S (1997) A follow-up study of job strain and heart disease among males in the NHANES1 population. Am J Indust Med 31:256–260
Sullivan M, Karlsson J (1998) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1105–1113
Theorell T (1998) Job characteristics in a theoretical and practical health context. In: Cooper CL (ed) Theories of organizational stress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 205–219
Vagg PR, Spielberger CD (1998) Occupational stress: measuring job pressure and organizational support in the workplace. J Occup Health Psychol 3:294–305
van der Doef M, Maes S (1999) The job demand-control(-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 13:87–114
van Veldhoven M, de Jonge J, Broersen S, Kompier M, Meijman T (2002) Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: a three-level analytic approach. Work Stress 16:207–228
Zapf D, Dormann C, Frese M (1996) Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. J Occup Health Psychol 1:145–169
Acknowledgments
The study received financial support from the Swedish Science Council (5454), the AFA insurance company, and funds from the Karolinska Institutet. The authors are grateful to the participants in the study, who took time and care to answer very similar questions several times on a row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wännström, I., Nygren, Å., Åsberg, M. et al. Different response alternatives in the assessment of job demands. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81, 813–819 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0269-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0269-x