Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Association between maternal occupational status and utilization of antenatal care

Study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Wuerttemberg 1998–2003

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Adequate utilization of antenatal care reduces the morbidity of mother and child. How frequent a pregnant woman attends antenatal care is dependent on many factors. The aim of this study was to assess the current influence of educational level and occupational status on maternal utilization of antenatal care under the conditions of an industrialized country and provision of universal coverage. Methods: The perinatal database 1998–2003 of the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg (556.948 pregnancies) was studied comparing antenatal care utilization for the different occupational categories obtained in the survey. For statistical analysis descriptive statistics and t test on equity of proportions for independent samples were used. Results: As occupational groups at risk of insufficient antenatal care unskilled workers, trainees, students, and housewives were identified. High rates of utilization were found for the categories “top management/executive position” and “skilled workers”. Rate of one or less consultations per pregnancy has declined significantly compared to 1998, but has increased again since 2000. Low utilization (2–5 consultations per pregnancy) has not decreased, showing rather constant differences between the occupational categories throughout the observed 6-year period. Unskilled workers, trainees, students, and housewives avail less of prenatal care above standard (more than ten consultations per pregnancy). Conclusions: Differences in an individual woman’s use of antenatal care is, besides many other factors, associated with occupational status. Antenatal care promotion should target trainees, students, and unskilled workers prone to insufficient utilization and its consequences, an increase in obstetrical risk. For these groups, the occupational physician may play a key role in reaching the pregnant women on time, as obstetric care reaches them insufficiently and too late. Although housewives are the most numerous group, inhomogeneity regarding their educational level and previous occupational status has to be assumed, calling for further clinical studies to design appropriate interventional concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. Based on German social law (Fuenftes Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V) ß 92 Abs.1 Satz 2 Nr. 4

  2. Based on German social law, Sozialgesetzbuch IX, current rate

References

  • Adler NE (1993) Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA 269:3140–3145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adler NE, Newman K (2002) Socioeconomic disparities in health—pathways and policies. Health Aff 21:60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini SB, Catalano PM (1996) Effect of prenatal care on obstetrical outcome. J Mat Fet Med 5:142–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beguin F (1996) Surveillance de la grossesse dans le cadre de la nouvelle LAMal. Arch Gynecol Obstet 259 (Suppl):84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesgeschäftsstelle fuer Qualitätssicherung (2003) http://www.bqs-online.de

  • Catalano R, Serxner S (1992) The effect of ambient threats to employment on low birth weight. J Health Soc Behav 33:363–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar S, Rao RS, Nair ND, Kutty PR (1998) Socio-demographic determinants of antenatal care. Trop Doct 28:206–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop S, Coyte P, McIsaac W (2000) Socioeconomic status and the utilization of physicians services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. Soc Sci Med 51(1):123–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fatmi Z, Avan B (2002) Demographic, socioeconomic and environmental determinants of utilisation of antenatal care in a rural setting of Sindh, Pakistan. JPMA 52:138–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gissler M, Meriläinen J, Vuori E, Hemminki E (2002) Register based monitoring shows decreasing socioeconomic differences in Finish perinatal health. Eur J Publ Health 12 (Supp): 57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg RS (1983) The impact of prenatal care in different social groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:797–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs O (1977) Die Relevanz psychosozialer Faktoren fuer die Schwangerschaft und die perinatale Periode bei ledigen und geschiedenen Muettern. Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der medizinischen Doktorwuerde an den medizinischen Fachbereichen der Freien Universität Berlin.

  • Heringa M, Huisjes HJ (1988) Prenatal screening: current policy in EC-countries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 28(Suppl):7–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington JP, Conell FA (1994) For every dollar spent—the cost saving argument for prenatal care. N Engl J Med 331:1303–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhauser G, Fuiko R, Panagl A (2000) Outcome of very-low-birth-weight infants at 1 and 2 years of age. Clin Pediatr 39:441–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A (2000) Variations in practice and outcomes in the Canadian NICU network: 1996–1997. Pediatrics 5:1070–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nierhaus W (2002) Deutsche Konjunktur 2001: Prognose und Wirklichkeit. Ifo Schnelldienst 55(2):32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore TR, Origel W, Key TC, Resnik R (1986) The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low socio-economic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:29–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross CE, Wu C (1995) The links between education and health. Am Soc Rev 10:719–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (2002) Angewandte Statistik: Anwendung statistischer Methoden,10th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selbmann HK (1984) Teilnahme an der Schwangerschaftsueberwachung in Bayern und Messung ihrer Effektivität. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 44:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW (2003) Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerenvorsorge—ein Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen und Aspekte der Effizienz. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 63:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schmahl FW (2004) Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and postpartum hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet, Online first, DOI: 10.1007/s00404-004-0692-0 (23.12.2004)

  • Trujillo-Hernández B, Rios-Silva M, Huerta M, Trujillo X, Vásquez C, Millán-Guerrero R (2002) Frequency of, indications for and clinical epidemiological characteristics of first time caesarean section, compared with repeated caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yunis KA, Beydoun H, Aaraj A (2001) Low socio-economic status (SES) and neonatal outcome in an urban developing population. Pediatr Res 49:346A

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar J, Baáqeel H, Piaggio G et al, WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group (2001) WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 357:1551–1564

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf KH (1992) Schwangerenvorsorge—Inanspruchnahme und Effektivität. Dt. Ärzteblatt 89:3215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the other members of the Perinatal Working Group Baden-Wuerttemberg: Prof. Dr. med. Mickan, deputy of the Medical Doctors’ Chamber (Aerztekammer) Baden-Wuerttemberg, Prof. Dr. med. Simon and Dr. med. Roll, deputies of the Hospital Society Baden-Wuerttemberg (Baden-Wuerttembergische Krankenhausgesellschaft) and Mrs. Bosing-Schwenkglenks. We would like to thank Mrs. Hübsch, for assistance in data management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Competence Center of Quality Management (KCQ) c/o Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung (MDK) Baden-Wuerttemberg, Ahornweg 2, 77933, Lahr, Germany

    Elisabeth Simoes

  2. Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kreiskrankenhaus Reutlingen, Steinenbergstr. 31, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany

    Siegfried Kunz

  3. Department of Statistics, Econometrics, and Operations Research, University of Tuebingen, Mohlstr. 3, 72074, Tuebingen, Germany

    Ralf Münnich

  4. Director of the Department of Occupational and Social Medicine, University of Tuebingen, Wilhelmstr. 27, 72074, Tuebingen, Germany

    Friedrich Wilhelm Schmahl

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Simoes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siegfried Kunz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralf Münnich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Friedrich Wilhelm Schmahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Simoes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simoes, E., Kunz, S., Münnich, R. et al. Association between maternal occupational status and utilization of antenatal care. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79, 75–81 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0020-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0020-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation