Abstract
Aim
As pre-employment screening and selection is a main function in the protection of susceptible applicants from developing an occupational disease, we need insight into the effectiveness of this intervention under different exposure conditions. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of three indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-employment examinations.
Method
We used a pre-employment medical evaluation table to gather the data needed for the indicators for effectiveness. The first indicator chosen is the predictive value of a positive test result (PPV) corresponding to the percentage of applicants who will develop an occupational disease after a positive test result. The second indicator is the number of pre-employment medical examinations needed to reduce the number of new cases of an occupational disease by one (number needed to test, NNT). The third is the number of rejections for the job, as the consequence of a positive test result, needed to reduce the number of new cases of an occupational disease by one (number needed to reject, NNR). To illustrate feasibility and usefulness, we used the example of potroom asthma in the primary-aluminium industry. We used data on personal risk factors and on the incidence of potroom asthma from a nested case–control study in the Netherlands.
Results
The three indicators for effectiveness could be applied. For high incidence rates, defined as 0.04 (40 cases/1,000 employees per year), the PPV values for personal risk indicators varied from 5% to 27%. The NNT varied from 116 to 667. Finally, the NNR varied from 4 to 20. For low incidence rates, defined as 0.005 (5 cases/1,000 employees per year), the PPV values were low (0.6% to 5%). The NNT were high (1,111 to 5,000). The NNR varied from 23 to 155.
Conclusion
The three indicators for effectiveness are applicable under the condition of the availability of relevant empirical data. The indicators provided useful information for the evaluation of the effectiveness of specific tests, which might be added as selection criteria. The personal risk factors studied were far from effective as selection instruments, especially in situations where a low incidence of potroom asthma exists. Personal risk factors at the pre-employment stage should not be added to the standard procedure to select susceptible applicants. Under conditions, they may be taken into account in a workers’ health surveillance programme. As a contribution to evidence-based occupational medicine, we recommend the use of the pre-employment medical evaluation table and the three chosen indicators for effectiveness as a standard tool to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-employment medical examinations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson MJ, Wlodarczyk JH, Saunders NA, Hensley MJ (1989) Does aluminium smelting cause lung disease? State of the art. Am Rev Respir Dis 139:1042–1057
de Kort WLAM, van Dijk FJH (1997) Preventive effectiveness of pre-employment medical assessments. Occup Environ Med 54:1–6
de Zotti R, Bovenzi M (2000) Prospective study of work related respiratory symptoms in trainee bakers. Occup Environ Med 57:58–61
Fisher J (1989) Screening, surveillance and training. In: Winder C (ed) Occupational asthma in the aluminium industry. J Occup Health Saf Aust N Z 5:421–424
Hulshof CTJ (2000) Een algemene richtlijn voor aanstellingskeuringen. TBV 8:46–51
International Labour Office (1998) Technical and ethical guidelines for workers’ health surveillance. Occupational safety and health series 72. ILO, Geneva
Hulshof CTJ, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJH, van der Weide WE, Braam IT (1999) Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and a systematic review of empirical studies. Occup Environ Med 56:361–377
Kremer A, Pal TM, Schouten JP, Rijcken B (1995) Airway hyperresponsivenss in workers exposed to low levels of irritants. Eur Respir J 8:53–61
Lakwijk N, van Strien RT, Doekes G, Brunekreef B, Gerritsen J (1998) Validation of a screening questionnaire for atopy with serum IgE tests in a population of pregnant Dutch women. Clin Exp Allergy 28:454–458
Mensinga TT, Schouten JP, Rijcken B, Weiss ST, Speizer FE, van der Lende R (1990) The relationship of eosinophilia and positive skin test reactivity to respiratory symptom prevalence in a community-based population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 86:99–107
Paggiaro PL, Vagaggini B, Bacci E, et al (1994) Prognosis of occupational asthma. Eur Respir J 7:761–767
Post WK, Steyerberg E, Burdorf A, Heederik D, Kromhout D (1996) Choosing optimal values of FEV1 and FEV1/FVC for surveillance for respiratory disorders in occupational populations. J Occup Environ Med 38:673–680
Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes E, Pederson OF, Peslin R, Yernault J-C (1993) Standardization of lung function testing. Eur Respir J 6 [Suppl 16]:5–40
Sackett DL, Strauss SE Richardson WS, et al (2000) Evidence-based medicine. How to practise and teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London
Sorgdrager B, Pal TM, de Looff AJA, Dubois AEJ, de Monchy JGR (1995) Occupational asthma in aluminium potroom workers related to pre-employment eosinophil count. Eur Respir J 8:1520–1524
Sorgdrager B, de Looff AJA, de Monchy JGR, Pal TM, Dubois AEJ, Rijcken B (1998) The occurrence of occupational asthma in aluminium potroom workers in relation to preventive measures. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:53–59
Sorgdrager B, de Looff AJA, Pal TM, van Dijk FJH, de Monchy JGR (2001) Factors affecting FEV1 in workers with potroom asthma five years after removal from exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:55–58
Soyseth V, Kongerud J (1992) Prevalence of respiratory disorders among aluminium potroom workers in relation to exposure to fluorides. Br J Ind Med 49:125–130
Soyseth V, Kongerud J, Kjuus H, Boe J (1994) Bronchial responsiveness and decline in FEV1 in aluminium potroom workers. Eur Respir J 7:888–894
Soyseth V, Kongerud J, Aalen O, Botten G, Boe J (1995) Bronchial responsiveness decreases in relocated aluminium potroom workers compared with workers who continue their potroom exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67:53–57
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorgdrager, B., Hulshof, C.T.J. & van Dijk, F.J.H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of pre-employment screening. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77, 271–276 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-003-0492-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-003-0492-z