Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic passive pressures of earth structures by nonlinear optimization

  • Original
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional seismic passive pressures of earth structures are based on a linear failure criterion in earthquake zones. However, experimental evidence shows that the strength envelopes are nonlinear over a wide range of normal stresses. In this paper, the analytical expressions of seismic passive pressures acting on inclined rigid walls are derived with nonlinear failure criterion. Quasi-static representation of earthquake effects using a seismic coefficient is adopted for seismic estimations. Instead of using the nonlinear criterion, a linear failure criterion, which is tangential to the nonlinear criterion, is used to formulate the seismic passive pressure problems as nonlinear programming problems. Analytical results are presented and compared with the previously published solutions using numerical technique. The influences of the parameters in the nonlinear failure criterion on seismic pressures and failure mechanisms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen W.F.: Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang X.L., Yin J.H.: Estimation of seismic passive earth pressure with nonlinear failure criterion. Eng. Struct. 28(3), 342–348 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soubra A.H., Macuh B.: Active and passive earth pressure coefficients by a kinematical approach. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Geotech. Eng. 55(2), 119–131 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Okamoto, S.: Bearing capacity of sandy soil and lateral earth pressure during earthquake. In: Proceeding of the 1st World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CA, pp. 1–26 (1956)

  5. Budhu M., Al–Karni A.: Seismic bearing capacity of soils. Geotechque 43(4), 181–187 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolucci R., Pecker A.: Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip foundation on the dry soils. Soils Found. 37(3), 95–105 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richards R., Elms D., Budhu M.: Seismic bearing capacity and settlement of foundations. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 119(4), 662–674 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agar J.G., Morgenstern N.R., Scott J.: Shear strength and stress–strain behavior of Athabasca oil sand at elevated temperatures and pressure. Can. Geotech. J. 24(1), 1–10 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker R.: Nonlinear Mohr envelopes based on triaxial data. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 130(5), 498–506 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai M., Kaiser P.K., Tasaka Y., Minami M.: Determination of residual strength of jointed rock masses using the GSI system. Int. J. Rock Mech. min. Sci. 44(2), 247–265 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman R.E.: Introduction to Rock Mechanics. 2nd edn. Wiley, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy T.C., Lindberg H.E.: Tunnel closure for nonlinear Mohr Coulomb functions. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. Div. 104(EM6), 1313–1326 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lefebvre G.: Strength and slope stability in Canadian soft clay deposits. Can. Geotech. J. 18(3), 420–442 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maksimovic M.: Nonlinear failure envelope for soils. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 115(4), 581–586 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mello V.B.F.: Reflections on design decisions of practical significance to embankment dams-17th Rankine Lecture. Geotechnique 27(3), 281–354 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perry J.: A technique for defining nonlinear shear strength envelopes and their incorporation in a slope stability method of analysis. Quart. J. Eng. Geol. 27(3), 231–241 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X.J., Chen W.F.: Stability analysis of slopes with general nonlinear failure criterion. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 11, 33–50 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lysmer J.: Limit analysis of plane problems in soil mechanics. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 96, 1311–1334 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donald I.B., Chen Z.Y.: Slope stability analysis by the upper bound approach: fundamental and method. Can. Geotech. J. 34(6), 853–862 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu H.S., Salgado R., Sloan S.W.: Limit analysis versus limit equilibrium for slope stability. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(3), 265–276 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker R., Frydman S.: Upper bound limit analysis of soil with nonlinear failure criterion. Soil Found. 23(4), 34–42 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Li Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, XL. Seismic passive pressures of earth structures by nonlinear optimization. Arch Appl Mech 81, 1195–1202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-010-0478-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-010-0478-8

Keywords

Navigation