Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining immunofluorescence with in situ proximity ligation assay: a novel imaging approach to monitor protein–protein interactions in relation to subcellular localization

  • Short communication
  • Published:
Histochemistry and Cell Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The in situ Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) is suited for visualizing protein–protein interactions and post-translational protein modifications in both tissue sections and in vitro cell cultures. Accurate identification and quantification of protein–protein interactions are critical for in vitro cell analysis, especially when studying the dynamic involvement of proteins in various processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Here, we monitored the interactions between protein kinase-Cζ (PKCζ) and Bcl10 protein in untreated and etoposide (VP-16)-treated C4-I cells by means of a new combined morphological approach and validated it by taking stock of our previous proteomic and biochemical work (Chiarini et al. in J Proteome Res 11:3996–4012, 2012). We first analyzed the colocalization of PKCζ and Bcl10 proteins through classical immunofluorescent colocalization analysis. On the basis of these results, we developed a novel imaging approach combining immunofluorescence (IF) techniques with in situ PLA to identify the PKCζ·Bcl10 complexes at the level of a specific subcellular compartment, i.e., the nuclear envelope (NE). By this means, we could show that the amount of PKCζ·Bcl10 complexes localized at the NE of C4-I cells during proliferation or after treatment with VP-16 closely corresponded to our previous purely biochemical results. Hence, the present findings demonstrate that the combination of in situ PLA with classical IF detection is a novel powerful analytical tool allowing to morphologically demonstrate new specific protein–protein interactions at level of subcellular organelles, the complexes functions of which can next be clarified through proteomic/biochemical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

CMLE:

Classical Maximum Likelihood Estimation

EDF:

Extended depth of fields

IF:

Immunofluorescence

IP:

Immunoprecipitation

LCM:

Laser confocal microscope(y)

MIP:

Maximum intensity project

NE:

Nuclear envelope

PFA:

Paraformaldheyde

PKCζ:

Protein kinase-Cζ

PLA:

Proximity Ligation Assay

PSF:

Point spread function

RCA:

Rolling-circle amplification

RCP:

Rolling-circle product

rt :

Room temperature

VP-16:

Etoposide

SVI:

Scientific Volume Imaging

References

  • Blokzijl A, Nong R, Darmanis S, Hertz E, Landegren U et al (2014) Protein biomarker validation via proximity ligation assays. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844:933–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolte S, Cordelières FP (2006) A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc 224:213–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarini A, Marconi M, Pacchiana R, Dal Prà I, Wu J et al (2012) Role-shifting PKCζ fosters its own proapoptotic destruction by complexing with Bcl10 at the nuclear envelope of human cervical carcinoma cells: a proteomic and biochemical study. J Proteome Res 11:3996–4012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciruela F (2008) Fluorescence-based methods in the study of protein–protein interactions in living cells. Curr Opin Biotech 19:338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clausson C-M, Allalou A, Weibrecht I, Mahmoudi S, Farnebo M et al (2011) Increasing the dynamic range of in situ PLA. Nat Methods 8:892–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emig S, Schmalz D, Shakibaei M, Buchner K (1995) The nuclear pore complex protein p62 is one of several sialic acid-containing proteins of the nuclear envelope. J Biol Chem 270:13787–13793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J, Olsson C, Pietras K et al (2002) Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol 20:473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein E, Schwille P (2007) Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: novel variations of an established technique. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 36:151–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuchowius K-J, Clausson C-M, Grannas K, Erbilgin Y, Botling J et al (2013) Parallel visualization of multiple protein complexes in individual cells in tumor tissue. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:1563–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mocanu M–M, Varadi T, Szöllősi J, Nagy P (2011) Comparative analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and proximity ligation assay (PLA). Proteomics 11:2063–2070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pass JM, Zhang J, Vondriska TM, Ping P (2003) Functional proteomic analysis of the protein kinase C signaling system. In: Newton AC (ed) Methods in molecular biology, Protein Kinase C Protocols. Humana Press Inc, Totowa, pp 369–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinidiyaarachchi A, Zieba A, Allalou A, Pardali K, Wählby C (2009) A detailed analysis of 3D subcellular signal localization. Cytometry A 75:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhett JM, Ongstad EL, Jourdan J, Gourdie RG (2012) Cx43 associates with Nav1.5 in the cardiomyocyte perinexus. J Membrane Biol 245:411–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Huang W, Tan Y, Jin X, Dua R et al (2009) A novel proximity assay for the detection of proteins and protein complexes: quantitation of HER1 and HER2 total protein expression and homodimerization in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell lines and breast cancer tissue. Diagn Mol Pathol 18:11–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Ridderstråle K, Leuchowius K-J et al (2006) Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Methods 3:995–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg O, Leuchowius K-J, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Weibrecht I et al (2008) Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods 45:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weibrecht I, Leuchowius K-J, Clausson C-M, Conze T, Jarvius M et al (2010) Proximity ligation assays: a recent addition to the proteomics toolbox. Expert Rev Proteomics 7:401–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Italian Ministry for University and Research (ex-60 % Funds to UA, AC, and IDP).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Chiarini.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pacchiana, R., Abbate, M., Armato, U. et al. Combining immunofluorescence with in situ proximity ligation assay: a novel imaging approach to monitor protein–protein interactions in relation to subcellular localization. Histochem Cell Biol 142, 593–600 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1244-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1244-8

Keywords

Navigation