Abstract
Although anthracycline antibiotics daunorubicin (DR), doxorubicin (DX), and epirubicin (ER) possess minor differences in their chemical structures, large differences are noted in their clinical use, as well as in cellular and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters in vivo. Immunocytochemistry for DR, DX, or ER was developed using an anti-DR monoclonal antibody (ADM-1-11), which has been demonstrated to react equally well with each of the three drugs, and therefore it was used for comparing their accumulation in several rat tissue cells after a single i.v. injection of each drug. In the kidney, immunoreactivity for each drug was distributed in essentially the same pattern and in the same strength 2 h after injection, but quite differently distributed in kidney cells thereafter, so that at 120-h post-injection significant amounts of DX and ER remained, but DR had almost completely vanished. Similar patterns of accumulation were observed in cells of other tissues including the pancreas, hair follicle, and stomach, with the exception of the intestine in which none of the three drugs remained after 120 h. These results appear to be supported by previous pharmacokinetic studies on the anthracyclines. The mechanism for such differences among the three drugs remains obscure, but the hydroxyl group at C-14 of DX and ER molecule might be related to the strong propensity of DX and ER to accumulate in tissue cells. The present results should contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of the differences in the pharmacokinetics, as well as the possibly in anti-tumor activities of the anthracyclines.
Abbreviations
- DR:
-
Daunorubicin
- DX:
-
Doxorubicin
- ER:
-
Epirubicin
- ICC:
-
Immunocytochemistry
- GA:
-
Glutaraldehyde
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- Pgp:
-
P-glycoprotein
References
Arcamone F, Penco S, Vigevani A et al (1975) Synthesis and antitumor properties of new glycosides of daunorubicinone and adriamycinone. J Med Chem 18:703–707
Basser RL, Green MD (1993) Strategies for prevention of anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Cancer Treat Rev 19:57–77
Blum RH (1975) An overview of studies with adriamycin (NSC) in the United States. Cancer Chemother Rep 6:247
Blum RH, Carter SK (1974) Adriamycin: a new anticancer drug with significant clinical activity. Ann Intern Med 80:249–259
Bonfante V, Bonadonna G, Villani F et al (1979) Preliminary phase I study of 4′-epi-adriamycin. Cancer Treat Rep 63:915–918
Calendi E, Dimarco A, Reigiani M (1965) On physico-chemical interactions between daunomycin and nucleic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 103:25–49
Camaggi CM, Comparsi R, Strocchi E, Testoni F, Angelelli B, Pannuti F (1988) Epirubicin and doxorubicin comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics: a cross-over study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 21:221–228
Chabner BA, Ryan DP, Paz-Ares L, Carbonero RG, Calabresi P (2001) Antineoplastic agents. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG (eds) Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 10th edn. McGraw–Hill, New York, p 1389
Di Marco A, Gaetani M, Dorigotti L, Soldati M, Bellini O (1963) Studi sperimentali sull attivita antineoplastica del nuovo antibiotico daunomicina. Tumori 49:203–217
Frederick CA, Williams LD, Ughetto G, van der Marel GA, Wang AH (1990) Structural comparison of anticancer drug-DNA complexes: adriamycin and daunomycin. Biochemistry 13:2538–2549
Fujiwara K, Takatsu H, Tsukamoto K (2005) Immunocytochemistry for drugs containing an aliphatic amino group in the molecule, anticancer antibiotic daunomycin as a model. J Histochem Cytochem 53:467–474
Fujiwara K, Shin M, Hougaard DM, Larsson L-I (2007) Distribution of anticancer antibiotic daunomycin in the rat heart and kidney revealed by immunocytochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. Histochem Cell Biol 127(1):69–77
Fujiwara K, Shin M, Matsunaga H, Saita T, Larsson L-I (2009) Light-microscopic immunocytochemistry for gentamicin and its use for studying uptake of the drug in kidney. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3302–3307
Gottesman MM, Pastan I (1993) Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multi-drug transporter. Annu Rev Biochem 62:385–427
Graham RC, Karnovsky NJ (1966) The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem 14:291–302
Iliskovic N, Hasinoff BB, Malisza KL, Li T, Danelisen I, Singal PK (1999) Mechanisms of beneficial effects of probucol in adriamycin cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Biochem 196:43–49
Lipscomb LA, Peek ME, Zhou FX, Bertrand JA, VanDerveer D, Williams LD (1994) Water ring structure at DNA interfaces: hydration and dynamics of DNA–anthracycline complexes. Biochemistry 33:3649–3659
Martini A, Moro E, Pacciarini MA, Tamassia V, Natale N, Piazza E (1984) Cross-over study of pharmacokinetics and haematological toxicity of 4′-epi-doxorubicin and doxorubicin in cancer patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 4:231–238
Montilla P, Tunez I, Munoz MC, Lopez A, Soria JV (1997) Hyperlipidemic nephropathy induced by adriamycin: effect of melatonin administration. Nephron 76:345–350
Neidle S (1977) A hypothesis concerning possible new derivatives of daunorubicin and adriamycin with enhanced DNA-binding properties. Cancer Treat Rep 61(5):928–929
Ohara K, Shin M, Larsson LI, Fujiwara K (2007a) Improved immunocytochemical detection of daunomycin. Histochem Cell Biol 127(6):603–608
Ohara K, Shin M, Nakamuta H, Larsson LI, Hougaard DM, Fujiwara K (2007b) Immunocytochemical studies on the distribution pattern of daunomycin in rat gastrointestinal tract. Histochem Cell Biol 128:285–290
Pohle W, Flemming J (1986) Interaction of the C14 group of adriamycin with DNA phosphate as spectroscopically evidenced. J Biomol Struct Dyn 4:243–250
Quigley GJ, Wang AH, Ughetto G, van der Marel G, van Boom JH, Rich A (1980) Molecular structure of an anticancer drug–DNA complex: daunomycin plus d(CpGpTpApCpG). Proc Natl Acad Sci 77:7204–7208
Ramanathan-Girish S, Boroujerdi M (2001) Contradistinction between doxorubicin and epirubicin: in vitro interaction with blood components. J Pharm Pharmacol 53:815–821
Schaub TP, Kartenbeck J, Konig J, Vogel O, Witzgall R, Kriz W, Keppler D (1997) Expression of the conjugate export pump encoded by the mrp2 gene in the apical membrane of kidney proximal tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:1213–1221
Shin M, Larsson L-I, Hougaard DM, Fujiwara K (2009) Daunomycin accumulation and induction of programmed cell death in rat hair follicles. Cell Tissue Res 337:429–438
Speth PA, Linssen PC, Termond EF, Boezeman JB, Wessels HM, Haanen C (1989) In vivo and in vitro pharmacokinetic differences between four structurally closely related anthracyclines in hematopoietic cell subtypes in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 17:98–105
Sugawara I, Kataoka I, Morishita Y, Hamada H, Tsuruo T, Itoyama S, Mori S (1988) Tissue distribution of P-glycoprotein encoded by a multidrug-resistant gene as revealed by a monoclonal antibody, MRK 16. Cancer Res 48:1926–1929
Thiebaut F, Tsuruo T, Hamada H, Gottesman MM, Pastan I, Willingham MC (1987) Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7735–7738
Zhang J, Clark JR, Herman EH, Ferrans VJ (1996) Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats: differential effects in heart, kidney and intestine, and inhibition by ICRF-187. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28:1931–1943
Zima T, Tesar V, Stipek S, Crkovska J, Poledne R, Teminova J, Platenik J, Rychlik I, Merta M, Nemeek K (1997) The influence of cyclosporin on lipid peroxidation and superoxide dismutase in adriamycin nephropathy in rats. Nephron 75:464–468
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to C. Narahara, M. Kawaguchi and K. Nagaoka for their technical assistance throughout this study. This study was supported in part by a grant the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (15590148). 606.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
418_2010_700_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary Figure 2 Immunostaining for DR, DX or ER in the kidney cortex of rats 2 h after a single i.v. injection of each drug (15 mg/kg; a to d) DR (a, b), DX (c), ER (d). a Lower magnification of the renal cortex. Protease digestion step was omitted in DR ICC. Immunostaining was absent in the S1 and S2 segments of the proximal tubules, but present weakly in S3 segment as well as in the distal convolution cells. b Cortex. Sections were pre-digested with 0.004% protease at 30 °C for 1 h prior to immunoreaction. Note weak or moderate staining in the microvilli (arrowheads), in the nuclei (arrows) of the S1 and S2 segment cells, and strong staining in distal convolution cells. c, d Cortex. Sections were pre-digested with 0.004% protease at 30 °C for 2 h prior to immunoreaction. Note that immunostaining patterns as well as intensity of immunostaining were both very comparable to those of Fig. 1b in the text. G, glomerulus; P, proximal tubule; D, distal tubule a = 100 μm; b, c, d = 20 μm (TIFF 638 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, M., Matsunaga, H. & Fujiwara, K. Differences in accumulation of anthracyclines daunorubicin, doxorubicin and epirubicin in rat tissues revealed by immunocytochemistry. Histochem Cell Biol 133, 677–682 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-010-0700-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-010-0700-3