Abstract
• Background: Psychophysical thresholds, including dark-adaptation functions and increment threshold sensitivities, are useful for the early detection and diagnosis of visual pathologies. However, few instruments have been designed or adapted for their routine clinical measurement. • Methods: Here we describe an instrument prototype designed to meet this need, which we refer to as the PULS (Programmier-barer Universeller Licht-Stimulator). The instrument is computer-controlled and fully automated. It allows direct control over target location, luminance, size, duration and temporal profile and over background luminance and spectral composition. It also incorporates an efficient and statistically rigorous strategy for determining threshold. • Results: We present examples of psychophysical functions — dark-adaptation curves, increment threshold sensitivities, estimates of temporal summation in the dark and during the time course of dark adaptation — which have been measured by the PULS prototype in normal observers and clinical patients. • Conclusions: The PULS instrument provides an automatic and efficient means of measuring dark adaptation and other psychophysical functions. It determines threshold by a more rigorous and faster method than is conventionally employed in clinical adaptometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpern M (1971) Rhodopsin kinetics in the human eye. J Physiol Lond 217: 447–471
Bloch AM (1885) Experiences sur la vision. Paris Soc Biol Mem 37: 493–495
Ernst W, Faulkner DJ, Hogg CR, Powell DJ, Arden GB, Vaegan (1983) An automated static perimeter/adaptometer using light emitting diodes. Br J Ophthalmol 67: 431–442
Friedburg C (1997) Zeitliche und räumliche Charakteristika der Detektion visueller Einzelreize während Hell- und Dunkeladaptation. Dissertation, University of Tübingen, Germany
Friedburg C, Sharpe LT. Zrenner E (1996) Cone and rod temporal summation during dark adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37: 728
Frunkes TE, Lange G, Denny N, Beckzowska I (1992) Influence of rod adaptation upon cone responses to light offset in humans. I. Results in normal observers. Vis Neurosci 8: 8–89
Hall JL (1981) Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 1763–1769
Harms H (1960) Die Bedeutung einer einheitlichen Prüfweise aller Sehfunktionen. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 63: 281–285
Jacobson SG, Voigt WJ, Parel JM, Apathy PP, Nghiem PL, Myers SW, Patella VM (1986) Automated light- and dark-adapted perimetry for evaluating retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 93: 1604–1611
Jayle GE, Ourgaud AG, Holmes WJ, Duke-Elder S (1959) Night vision. Thomas, Springfield, Ill
Krauskopf J, Mollon JD (1971) The independence of temporal integration properties of individual chromatic mechanisms in the human eye. J Physiol Lond 219: 611–623
Lange G, Frumkes TE (1992) Influence of rod adaptation upon cone response to light offset in humans. II. Results in an observer with exaggerated suppressive rod-cone interaction. Vis Neurosci 8: 91–95
Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 183–206
Montellese S, Sharpe LT, Brown JL (1979) Changes in critical duration during dark-adaptation. Vision Res 19: 1147–1153
O’Mara PA, Zwick H, Beatrice ES, Lund DJ (1982) Microprocessor-controlled light-emitting diode dark adaptometer. Med Biol Eng Comput 20: 70–76
Sharpe LT, Fach C, Nordby K (1988) Temporal summation in the achromat. Vision Res 28: 1263–1269
Steward BR (1972) Temporal summation during dark adaptation. J Opt Soc Am 62: 449–457
Taylor MM, Creelman CD (1967) PEST: efficient estimates of probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 41: 782–787
Treutwein B (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 35: 2503–2522
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedburg, C., Sharpe, L.T., Beuel, S. et al. A computer-controlled system for measuring dark adaptation and other psychophysical functions. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236, 31–40 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050039
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050039