Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the disruption of horizontal anterior ciliary vessels affect the blood–aqueous barrier function?

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the significance of the anterior ciliary vessels (ACVs) preservation during the conventional horizontal strabismus surgery.

Methods

Patients (≥ 8 years) with horizontal strabismus were randomly allocated into group 1 (with ACV preservation) and group 2 (without ACV preservation). The surgical eyes in group 1 were further divided into group A (one rectus muscle operated) and group B (two rectus muscles operated). Similarly, eyes in group 2 were divided into group C (one rectus muscle operated) and group D (two rectus muscles operated). The success rate of ACV preservation was calculated. The anterior chamber flare measurements of each eye by laser flare photometry were recorded on the day prior to and after operation. The flare values between groups and between pre- and post-operation in each group were compared by one-way analysis of variance and a paired t-test respectively.

Results

In groups A and B, the success rate of ACV preservation was 82% (27/33) and 70% (28/40)respectively, and the flare values between pre- and post-operation showed no significant differences(4.378 ± 1.527, 4.544 ± 1.452, P = 0.526; 4.625 ± 1.090, 4.989 ± 1.468, P = 0.101 respectively). However, the postoperative values were significantly increased in group C and group D(4.661 ± 1.031, 5.039 ± 1.310, P = 0.025; 4.933 ± 1.691, 5.502 ± 1.430, P = 0.000 respectively). The postoperative flare readings of group D were significantly higher than group B, while group A and group C had no significant variation.

Conclusion

ACV preservation probably has clinical significance in reducing the undesirable influence on the blood–aqueous barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilcox LM, Keough EM, Connally RJ, Hotte CE (1980) The contribution of blood flow by the anterior ciliary arteries to the anterior segment in the primate eye. Exp Eye Res 30(2):167–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright KW, Lanier AB (1991) Effect of a modified rectus tuck on anterior segment circulation in monkeys. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28(2):77–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simon JW, Grajny A (2004) Anterior segment ischemia following augmented 2-muscle transposition surgery. J AAPOS 8(6):586–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon JW, Price EC, Krohel GB, Poulin RW, Reinecke RD (1984) Anterior segment ischemia following strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 21(5):179–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunders RA, Phillips MS (1988) Anterior segment ischemia after three rectus muscle surgery. Ophthalmology 9(4):533–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McKeown CA, Lambert HM, Shore JW (1989) Preservation of the anterior ciliary vessels during extraocular muscle surgery. Ophthalmology 96(4):498–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakefield D, Herbort CP, Tugal-Tutkun I, Zierhut M (2010) Controversies in ocular inflammation and immunology laser flare photometry. Ocular Immunology & Inflammation 18(5):334–340. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2010.512994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawa M (2011) Development of non-invasive clinical examination methods for the anterior segment of the eye and their clinical significance. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi1 15(3):177–211

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tugal-Tutkun I, Herbort CP (2010) Laser flare photometry: a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative method to measure intraocular inflammation. Int Ophthalmol 30(5):453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9310-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aguirre Vila-Coro A (1990) Vascular microdissection in strabismus surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 108(10):1034–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen MS, Chang CC, Ho TC, Tsai TH, Fan IM, Hou PK (2010) Blood–aqueous barrier function in a patient with choroideremia. J Formos Med Assoc 109(2):167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646 (10) 60038-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yasuda K, Motohashi R, Kotake O, Nakagawa H, Noma H, Shimura M (2016) Comparative effects of topical diclofenac and betamethasone on inflammation after vitrectomy and cataract surgery in various vitreoretinal diseases. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 32(10):677–684. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2016.0099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Demirel S, Bilici S, Batıoğlu F, Özmert E (2016) Is there any difference between ranibizumab and aflibercept injections in terms of inflammation measured with anterior chamber flare levels in age-related macular degeneration patients: a comparative study. Ophthalmic Res 56(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444497[PubMed:27027523]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulder VC, Tode J, van Dijk EH, Purtskhvanidze K, Roider J, van Meurs JC, Treumer F (2017). Preoperative aqueous humour flare values do not predict proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 2017 Jan 11. Pii: bjophthalmol-2016-309134. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309134

  15. Johnson MS, Christiansen SP, Rath PP, Watanabe TM, Merten G, Bothun ED, Anderson JS (2009) Anterior ciliary circulation from the horizontal rectus muscles. Strabismus 17(1):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273970802678180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akyüz Unsal AI, Unsal A, Ozkan SB, Karaman CZ (2007) The effect of strabismus surgery on retrobulbar hemodynamics. J AAPOS 11(3):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.12.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Department of Science and Technology of Fujian province provided financial support in the form of the Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2016D007, Website: http://xmgl.fjkjt.gov.cn/p_itemsearch.pr.pr_itemsearch.do#), China.

The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meihua Pan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, M., Yang, M., Xie, R. et al. Does the disruption of horizontal anterior ciliary vessels affect the blood–aqueous barrier function?. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255, 2451–2457 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3807-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3807-6

Keywords

Navigation