Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity

  • Cataract
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 June 2015

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate subjectively reported outcomes following cataract surgery and the relationships between such outcomes in the context of falling thresholds for cataract surgery.

Setting

Large, private, non-refractive cataract practice, Institute of Eye Surgery, Whitfield Clinic, Waterford, Ireland

Methods

Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data of 2552 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification and implantation of the TecnisR ZCB00 1-piece intraocular lens (IOL) by a single surgeon between July 2009 and October 2013 was analysed. Patients without visually consequential ocular co-morbidity completed two validated questionnaires, designed to assess subjectively perceived visual functioning and identify symptoms of dysphotopsia following cataract surgery.

Results

54.8 % of questionnaire respondents were entirely satisfied (satisfaction 10/10) post-operatively, with 83.7 % reporting satisfaction of ≥7/10. Satisfaction was positively associated with patient age and negatively associated with spectacle dependence, dysphotopsia, and function related to vision (NEI VF-11) score. The mean (±standard deviation[SD]) dysphotopsia score was 1.36 (±1.9; scale 0–10), with 40 % of respondents reporting no dysphotopsia symptoms and 9.8 % reporting clinically meaningful dysphotopsia. The mean (±SD) National Eye Institute visual function-11 (NEI VF-11) score was 0.33 (±0.53; scale 0–4) and reduced function related to vision was associated with increasing severity of dysphotopsia symptoms. When linear regression was applied, 17.5 % of the variation in functionality was attributable to symptoms of dysphotopsia.

Conclusion

Dysphotopsia is an important determinant of a patient having difficulty with vision-related tasks following cataract surgery, and patient satisfaction is positively associated with patient age and negatively associated with spectacle in dependence, dysphotopsia and function related to the vision (NEI VF-11) score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charalampidou S, Loughman J, Nolan J, Stack J, Cassidy L, Pesudovs K, Beatty S (2011) Prognostic indicators and outcome measures for surgical removal of symptomatic nonadvanced cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 129(9):1155–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charalampidou S, Dooley I, Molloy L, Beatty S (2010) Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 38(3):255–265

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grimfors M, Mollazadegan K, Lundstrom M, Kugelberg M (2014) Ocular comorbidity and self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1163–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinard K, Jarstad A, Olson RJ (2013) Correlation of visual quality with satisfaction and function in a normal cohort of pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:590–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lundstrom M, Albrecht S, Hakansson I et al (2006) NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:495–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dooley I, Charalampidou S, Malik A, Ormonde G, Loughman J, Molloy L et al (2010) Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification with and without correction for posture-related ocular cyclotorsion: randomized controlled study. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(3):413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saeed A, Guerin M, Khan I, Keane P, Stack J, Hayes P, Tormey P, Mulhern M, Beatty S (2007) Deferral of first review after uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery until 2 weeks: randomized controlled study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1591–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey IL, Lovie-Kitchin JE (2013) Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic. Vis Res 90:2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  10. Sabour-Pickett S, Loughman J, Nolan JM et al (2013) Visual performance in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration undergoing treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab. J Ophthalmol 268438

  11. Beatty S, Nolan JM, Muldrew KA et al (2013) Visual outcome after antioxidant supplementation. Ophthalmology 120:645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beatty S, Chakravarthy U, Nolan JM et al (2013) Secondary outcomes in a clinical trial of carotenoids with coantioxidants versus placebo in early age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 120:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundstrom M, Goh PP, Henry Y, Salowi MA, Barry P, Manning S, Rosen P, Stenevi U (2014) The Changing Pattern of Cataract Surgery Indications: A 5-Year Study of 2 Cataract Surgery Databases. Ophthalmology 122(1):31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundstrom M, Barry P, Henry Y, Rosen P, Stenevi U (2012) Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1086–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Galloway P, Canning C, Sparrow JM, UK EPR user group (2009) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally. Eye (Lond) 23:38–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen M, Lamatina KC, Patrianakos T, Dwarakanathan S (2014) Complication rate of posterior capsular rupture with vitreous loss during phacoemulsification at a Hawaiian cataract surgical center: a clinical audit. Clin Ophthalmol 8:375–378

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walters TR, Goldberg DF, Peace JH, Gow JA (2014) Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily for cataract surgery: results of 2 randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology 121:25–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M (2009) Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 23:149–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amesbury EC, Grossberg AL, Hong DM, Miller KM (2009) Functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with 20/20 or better preoperative visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(9):1505–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tester R, Pace NL, Samore M, Olson RJ (2000) Dysphotopsia in phakic and pseudophakic patients: incidence and relationship to intra-ocular lens type. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:810–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davison JA (2000) Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1346–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holladay JT, Zhao H, Reisin CR (2012) Negative dysphotopsia: the enigmatic penumbra. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(7):1251–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwiegerling J (2006) Recent developments in pseudophakic dysphotopsia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vámosi P, Csákány B, Németh J (2010) Intraocular lens exchange in patients with negative dysphotopsia symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(3):418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Masket S, Fram NR (2011) Pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia: Surgical management and new theory of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1199–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  1. The threshold for elective cataract surgery. (2012) Beatty S. The Consultant; 1: 61–62.

  2. https://www.amo-inc.com/pdf/TECNIS_One_Piece_Insert.pdf

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

This study was funded by Abbott Medical Optics, Germany. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Kirwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirwan, C., Nolan, J.M., Stack, J. et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 1735–1744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3038-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3038-7

Keywords

Navigation