Abstract
Background
Evaluation of the efficacy of monochromatic photography of the ocular fundus in differentiating optic nerve head drusen (ONHD) and optic disc oedema (ODE).
Methods
Sixty-six patients with ONHD, 31 patients with ODE and 70 healthy subjects were studied. Colour and monochromatic fundus photography with different filters (green, red and autofluorescence) were performed. The results were analysed blindly by two observers. The sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement (k) of each test were assessed.
Results
Colour photography offers 65.5 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity for the diagnosis of ONHD. Monochromatic photography improves sensitivity and specificity and provides similar results: green filter (71.20 % sensitivity, 96.70 % specificity), red filter (80.30 % sensitivity, 96.80 % specificity), and autofluorescence technique (87.8 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity). The interobserver agreement was good with all techniques used: autofluorescence (k = 0.957), green filter (k = 0.897), red filter (k = 0.818) and colour (k = 0.809).
Conclusions
Monochromatic fundus photography permits ONHD and ODE to be differentiated, with good sensitivity and very high specificity. The best results were obtained with autofluorescence and red filter study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lam BL, Morais CG Jr, Pasol J (2008) Drusen of the optic disc. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 8:404–408
Mustonen E, Nieminen H (1982) Optic disc drusen—a photographic study. I. Autofluorescence pictures and fluorescein angiography. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60:849–858
Kelley JS (1974) Autofluorescence of drusen of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 92:263–264
Haynes RJ, Manivannnan A, Walker S, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (1997) Imaging of optic nerve head drusen with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol 81:654–657
Bec P, Adam P, Mathis A, Alberge Y, Roulleau J, Arne JL (1984) Optic nerve head drusen. High-resolution computed tomographic approach. Arch Ophthalmol 102:680–682
Flores-Rodríguez P, Gili P, Martín-Ríos MD (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32:213–221
Atta HR (1988) Imaging of the optic nerve with standardised echography. Eye 2:358–366
Lamminen H, Voipio V, Ruohonen K, Uusitalo H (2003) Telemedicine in ophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:105–109
Bennett TJ, Barry C (2009) Ophthalmic imaging to- day: an ophthalmic photographer’s view- point – a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 37:2–13
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–74
Wilkins JM, Pomeranz HD (2004) Visual manifestations of visible and buried optic disc drusen. J Neuroophthalmol 24:125–129
Mustonen E (1983) Pseudopapilloedema with and without verified optic disc drusen: a clinical analisis I. Acta Ophthalmol 61:1037–1056
Flores-Rodriguez P, Gili P, Martín-Rios MD (2012) Ophthalmic features of optic disc drusen. Ophthalmologica 228:59–66
Kurz-Levin MM, Landau K (1999) A comparison of imaging techniques for diagnosing drusen of optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1045–1049
Lam BL, Morais CG Jr, Pasol J (2008) Drusen of the optic disc. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 8:404–408
Miller NR, George TW (1978) Monochromatic (red-free) photography and ophthalmoscopy of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:1121–1124
Sanders MD, Fftytche FJ (1967) Fluoresceín angiography in the diagnosis of drusen of the disc. Trans Ohthalmol Soc UK 87:457–468
Pierro L, Brancato R, Minicucci M, Pece A (1994) Echographic diagnosis of Drusen of the optic nerve head in patients with angioid streaks. Ophthalmologica 208:239–242
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gili, P., Flores-Rodríguez, P., Yangüela, J. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of monochromatic photography of the ocular fundus in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 923–928 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2223-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2223-1