Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitivity and specificity of monochromatic photography of the ocular fundus in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema

Optic disc drusen and oedema

  • Neurophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Evaluation of the efficacy of monochromatic photography of the ocular fundus in differentiating optic nerve head drusen (ONHD) and optic disc oedema (ODE).

Methods

Sixty-six patients with ONHD, 31 patients with ODE and 70 healthy subjects were studied. Colour and monochromatic fundus photography with different filters (green, red and autofluorescence) were performed. The results were analysed blindly by two observers. The sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement (k) of each test were assessed.

Results

Colour photography offers 65.5 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity for the diagnosis of ONHD. Monochromatic photography improves sensitivity and specificity and provides similar results: green filter (71.20 % sensitivity, 96.70 % specificity), red filter (80.30 % sensitivity, 96.80 % specificity), and autofluorescence technique (87.8 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity). The interobserver agreement was good with all techniques used: autofluorescence (k = 0.957), green filter (k = 0.897), red filter (k = 0.818) and colour (k = 0.809).

Conclusions

Monochromatic fundus photography permits ONHD and ODE to be differentiated, with good sensitivity and very high specificity. The best results were obtained with autofluorescence and red filter study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lam BL, Morais CG Jr, Pasol J (2008) Drusen of the optic disc. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 8:404–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mustonen E, Nieminen H (1982) Optic disc drusen—a photographic study. I. Autofluorescence pictures and fluorescein angiography. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60:849–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelley JS (1974) Autofluorescence of drusen of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 92:263–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haynes RJ, Manivannnan A, Walker S, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (1997) Imaging of optic nerve head drusen with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol 81:654–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bec P, Adam P, Mathis A, Alberge Y, Roulleau J, Arne JL (1984) Optic nerve head drusen. High-resolution computed tomographic approach. Arch Ophthalmol 102:680–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores-Rodríguez P, Gili P, Martín-Ríos MD (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Atta HR (1988) Imaging of the optic nerve with standardised echography. Eye 2:358–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamminen H, Voipio V, Ruohonen K, Uusitalo H (2003) Telemedicine in ophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett TJ, Barry C (2009) Ophthalmic imaging to- day: an ophthalmic photographer’s view- point – a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 37:2–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkins JM, Pomeranz HD (2004) Visual manifestations of visible and buried optic disc drusen. J Neuroophthalmol 24:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mustonen E (1983) Pseudopapilloedema with and without verified optic disc drusen: a clinical analisis I. Acta Ophthalmol 61:1037–1056

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flores-Rodriguez P, Gili P, Martín-Rios MD (2012) Ophthalmic features of optic disc drusen. Ophthalmologica 228:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurz-Levin MM, Landau K (1999) A comparison of imaging techniques for diagnosing drusen of optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1045–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam BL, Morais CG Jr, Pasol J (2008) Drusen of the optic disc. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 8:404–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller NR, George TW (1978) Monochromatic (red-free) photography and ophthalmoscopy of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:1121–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanders MD, Fftytche FJ (1967) Fluoresceín angiography in the diagnosis of drusen of the disc. Trans Ohthalmol Soc UK 87:457–468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierro L, Brancato R, Minicucci M, Pece A (1994) Echographic diagnosis of Drusen of the optic nerve head in patients with angioid streaks. Ophthalmologica 208:239–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Gili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gili, P., Flores-Rodríguez, P., Yangüela, J. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of monochromatic photography of the ocular fundus in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 923–928 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2223-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2223-1

Keywords

Navigation