Abstract
Objective
To estimate myopia progression during a 2-year period in a cohort of medical students in mainland China.
Methods
A 2-year longitudinal study was performed among 2,053 Chinese medical students (mean age 18.27 years, 1,057 females and 996 males) with their refraction measured at the start and the end of this study by autorefraction in cycloplegia. Information about the students’ age, gender, home origin (urban or rural), and eye history was obtained through a questionnaire.
Results
The overall prevalence of myopia increased significantly from 78.5 % to 84.1 % (P < 0.001, right eye) and the mean refractive error increased significantly from −2.52 ± 2.13 D to −2.84 ± 2.16 D (P < 0.001, right eye) over the 2 years. The rural students had a significantly greater increase in prevalence of myopia and the refractive error towards myopia than the urban ones (P < 0.01 and 0.001 respectively). Females had a significantly faster myopic shift than males (P < 0.001). Participants with myopia initially showed the fastest myopic shift among the initial refractive groups. The relationship between the initial refractive error and the myopic shift remained significant after adjusting for sex and home origin (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Myopia progressed as increase in prevalence of myopia and change in refraction towards myopia in this study population. Participants who were more myopic at baseline were more likely to have myopia progression. Female and rural participants had a faster myopic shift compared to male and urban ones, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fledelius HC (2000) Myopia profile in Copenhagen medical students 1996–1998. Refractive stability over a century is suggested. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:501–505
Midelfart A, Aamo B, SjØhang KA, Dysthe BE (1992) Myopia among medical students in Norway. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 70(3):317–322
Woo WW, Lim KA, Yang H, Lim XY, Liew F, Lee YS, Saw SM (2004) Refractive errors in medical students in Singapore. Singap Med J 45:470–474
Lin LLK, Shih YF, Lee YC, Hung PT, Hou PK (1996) Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students. A 5-year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 73:495–498
Erismann F, Curtin BJ (1985) The myopias: basic science and clinical management. Harper & Row, Philiadelphia
Goss DA, Winkler RL (1983) Progression of myopia in youth: age of cessation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 60:651–658
Goldschmidt E (1968) On the etiology of myopia: an epidemiologic study. Acta Ophthalmol(Suppl) (Kbh) 98:1–172
Jacobsen N, Jensen H, Goldschmidt E (2008) Does the level of physical activity in university students influence development and progression of myopia? — a 2-year prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:1322–1327
Wu HM, Seet B, Yap EP, Saw SM, Lim TH, Chia KS (2001) Does education explain ethnic differences in myopia prevalence? A population-based study of young adult males in Singapore. Optom Vis Sci 78(4):234–239
Edwards MH, Lam CYS (2004) The epidemiology of myopia in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singap 33:34–38
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
Fesharaki H, Kamali B, Karbasi M, Fasihi M (2006) Development of myopia in medical school. Asian J Ophthalmol 8:199–202
Chow YC, Dhillon B, Chew PT, Chew SJ (1990) Refractive errors in Singapore medical students. Singap Med J 31:472–473
Adams DW, McBrien NA (1992) Prevalence of myopia and myopic progression in a population of clinical microscopists. Optom Vis Sci 69:467–473
Onal S, Toker E, Akingol Z, Arslan G, Ertan S, Turan C, Kaplan O (2007) Refractive errors of medical students in Turkey: one year follow-up of refraction and biometry. Optom Vis Sci 84:175–180
Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD, Chew SJ, Chan TK (1996) Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev 18:175–187
Lu B, Congdon N, Liu X, Choi K, Lam DS, Zhang M, Zheng M, Zhou Z, Li L, Liu X, Sharma A, Song Y (2009) Associations between near work, outdoor activity, and myopia among adolescent students in rural China. Arch Ophthalmol 127(6):769–775
Shulkin DJ, Bari MM (1986) Deteriorating vision: an occupational risk for the medical student. Arch Ophthalmol 104:1274
Kinge B, Midelfart A (1999) Refractive changes among Norwegian university students — a three-year longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:302–305
McBrien NA, Adams DW (1997) A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:321–333
Bullimore MA, Reuter KS, Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Zoz J, Rah MJ (2006) The study of progression of adult nearsightedness (SPAN): design and baseline characteristics. Optom Vis Sci 83:594–604
O’Neal MR, Connon TR (1987) Refractive error change at the United States Air Force Academy — class of 1985. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64:344–354
Ellingsen KL, Nizam A, Ellingsen BA, Lynn MJ (1997) Age-related refractive shifts in simple myopia. J Refract Surg 13:223–228
Krause U, Krause K, Rantakallio P (1982) Sex differences in refraction errors up to age of 15. Acta Ophthalmol 60:917–926
Xu L, Li J, Cui T, Hu A, Fan G, Zhang R, Yang H, Sun B, Jonas JB (2005) Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology 112:1676–1683
Acknowledgments
We thank the students for their participation and the ophthalmologists and the officers of Teaching Administration at Weifang Medical University for their contribution to this study.
This study was supported by grants from Shandong Provincial Education Department (S07WZ73) and Weifang Medical University, PR China.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This submission has not been published anywhere previously, and it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lv, L., Zhang, Z. Pattern of myopia progression in Chinese medical students: a two-year follow-up study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 163–168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2074-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2074-9