Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of final visual outcome between open- and closed-globe injuries following surgical treatment of traumatic cataract

  • Trauma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this work is to compare final visual outcomes in cases of surgically treated traumatic cataract between open-globe and closed-globe groups, as classified by the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology system.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary eye-care center at the trijunction of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan states in central western India.

Methods

We enrolled patients meeting specific inclusion criteria, examined their eyes to review any co-morbidities due to trauma, performed surgery for traumatic cataracts, and implanted lenses. The patients were re-examined 6 weeks postoperatively. We classified the cases of traumatic cataract as either open-globe (group 1) or closed-globe (group 2), according to the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT) system, and compared visual acuity.

Outcome measures

Visual Acuity.

Results

Our cohort of 687 eyes with traumatic cataracts included 496 eyes in group 1 and 191 in group 2. Six weeks postoperatively, the visual acuity was >20/60 in 298 (58%) and 75 (39.1%) operated eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001, ANOVA). At follow-up, >20/60 vision was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 0.85–3.02). Overall, 373 eyes (54.3%) regained final visual acuity >20/60.

Conclusions

Open-globe injury has a more favorable prognosis for satisfactory (>20/60) visual recovery after management of traumatic cataracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khatry SK, Lewis AE, Schein OD, Thapa MD, Pradhan EK, Katz J (2004) The epidemiology of ocular trauma in rural Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 88:456–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham DI, Vitale SI, West SI, Isseme I (1999) Epidemiology of eye injuries in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 6:85–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfaro DV, Jablon EP, Rodriguez Fontal M, Villalba SJ, Morris RE, Grossman M, Roig-Melo E (2005) Fishing-related ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol 139:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah M, Shah S, Khandekar R (2008) Ocular injuries and visual status before and after their management in the tribal areas of western India—a historical cohort study. Grafes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mester V (2004) The Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology system (BETT). J Fr Ophtalmol 27:206–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinand F, Plag M, Pavlovic S (2003) Primary implantation of posterior chamber lenses after traumatic cataract penetration. Ophthalmology 100:843–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baykara M, Dogru M, Ozçetin H, Ertürk H (2002) Primary repair and intraocular lens implantation after perforating eye injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1832–1835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammad pour M, Jafarinasab MR, Javadi MA (2007) Outcomes of acute postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:20–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khvatova AV, Kruglova TB (1992) Intraocular correction in the restorative therapy of children with congenital and traumatic cataracts. Vestn Oftalmol 108:18–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbett MC, Shilling JS, Holder GE (1995) The assessment of clinical investigations: the Greenwich Grading System and its application to electro diagnostic testing in ophthalmology. Eye 9:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Segev Y, Goldstein M, Lazar M, Reider-Groswasser I (1995) CT appearance of a traumatic cataract. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:1174–1175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McWhae JA, Crichton AC, Rinke M (2003) Ultrasound biomicroscopy for the assessment of zonules after ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 110:1340–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Shi S (1998) Determination of posterior lens capsule status in traumatic cataract with B-ultrasonography. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 34:298–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brar GS, Ram J, Pandav SS, Reddy GS, Singh U, Gupta A (2001) Postoperative complications and visual results in uniocular pediatric traumatic cataract. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32:233–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wos M, Mirkiewicz-Sieradzka B (2004) Traumatic cataract—treatment results. Klin Oczna 106:31–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baklouti K, Mhiri N, Mghaieth F, El Matri L (2005) Traumatic cataract: clinical and therapeutic aspects. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 298:13–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vatavuk Z, Pentz A (2004) Combined clear cornea phacoemulsification, vitrectomy, foreign body extraction, and intraocular lens implantation. Croat Med J 45:295–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan KS (1993) Cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 4:54–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K, Sasaki K, Sperduto R, Taylor HR (2002) A simplified cataract grading system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 9:83–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Society of Ocular Trauma. Ocular trauma Score (OTS) http://www.asotonline.org/ots.html accessed on 10/12/2008

  21. Behbehani AM, Lotfy N, Ezzdean H, Albader S, Kamel M, Abul N (2002) Open eye injuries in the pediatric population in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 11:183–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, Pillitteri F, Cillino GA (2008) Five-year retrospective study of the epidemiological characteristics and visual outcomes of patients hospitalized for ocular trauma in a Mediterranean area. BMC Ophthalmol 22:6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith AR, O'Hagan SB, Gole GA (2006) Epidemiology of open- and closed-globe trauma presenting to Cairns Base Hospital, Queensland. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 34:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krishnamachary M, Rathi V, Gupta S (1997) Management of traumatic cataract in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:681–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Dada T, Gupta V, Kumar A, Dada VK (2001) Management of posterior capsule tears. Surv Ophthalmol 45:473–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicting interests

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehul Ashvin Shah.

Additional information

No financial support was received from any company or institution.

This study has not been presented at any conference or meeting.

The authors have no financial interest in any aspect of this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM1

(DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, M.A., Shah, S.M., Shah, S.B. et al. Comparative study of final visual outcome between open- and closed-globe injuries following surgical treatment of traumatic cataract. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 1775–1781 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1732-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1732-7

Keywords

Navigation