Abstract
Background
To compare the incidence of anterior capsule contraction syndrome (ACCS) after hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 639 eyes of 639 patients (one eye from each patient) were included, and were divided in two groups according to the type of IOL implanted [hydrophobic (group 1: 273 eyes) or hydrophilic (group 2: 366 eyes, two different IOL models: group 2a, 267 eyes and group 2b, 99 eyes)]. ACCS incidence between groups 1 and 2 as well as between hydrophilic group IOL models was compared.
Results
ACCS was significantly (p = 0.012) less frequent in group 1 (hydrophobic) than group 2 (hydrophilic) (four eyes versus 19 eyes respectively). In the hydrophilic group, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two IOL models (ACCS was observed in 13 eyes of the Quatrix and six eyes of the ACR6D IOL model: p = 0.65).
Conclusions
ACCS was significantly greater after hydrophilic IOL implantation when compared with hydrophobic lenses, while there was no statistical significant difference between the two hydrophilic IOL models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davison JA (1993) Capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:582–589
Hanson S, Crandall A, Olson R (1993) Progressive constriction of the anterior capsular opening following intact capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:77–82
Deokule SP, Mukherjee SS, Chew CK (2006) Neodymium: YAG laser anterior capsulotomy for capsular contraction syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 37:99–105
Chéour M, Mghaieth K, Bouladi M, Hasnaoui W, Mrabet I, Kraiem A (2007) Nd: YAG laser treatment of anterior capsule contraction syndrome after phacoemulsification. J Fr Ophtalmol 30:903–907
Kurosaka E, Ando I, Kato K, Oshima T, Kurosaka H, Yoshino M, Nagamoto T, Ando N (1999) Fibrous membrane formation at the capsule margin in capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:930–935
Caporossi A, Casprini G, Tosi GM, Balestrazzi A, Stumpo M, Toti P (1998) Histology of anterior capsule fibrosis following phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:1343–1346
Spang KM, Rohrbach JM, Weidle EG (1999) Complete occlusion of the anterior capsular opening after intact capsulorhexis: clinicopathologic correlation. Am J Ophthalmol 127:343–345
Kato S, Suzuki T, Hayashi Y, Numaga J, Hattori T, Yuguchi T, Kaiya T, Oshika T (2002) Risk factors for contraction of the anterior capsule opening. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:109–112
Kato S, Oshika T, Numaga J, Hayashi Y, Oshiro M, Yuguchi T, Kaiya T (2001) Anterior capsular contraction after cataract surgery in eyes of diabetic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 85:21–23
Sudhir RR, Rao SK (2001) Capsulorhexis phimosis in retinitis pigmentosa despite capsular tension ring implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1691–1694
Hayashi Y, Kato S, Fukushima H, Numaga J, Kaiya T, Tamaki Y, Oshika T (2004) Relationship between anterior capsule contraction and posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1517–1520
Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1998) Anterior capsule contraction and intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1429–1432
Matsuda H, Kato S, Hayashi Y, Amano S, Hattori T, Yuguchi T, Kaiya T, Oshika T (2001) Anterior capsular contraction after cataract surgery in vitrectomized eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 132:108–109
Apple DJ (2000) Influence of intraocular lens material and design on postoperative intracapsular cellular reactivity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98:257–283
Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Werner L, Maloof AJ, Milverton EJ (2004) Posterior capsule opacification: a review of the aetiopathogenesis, experimental and clinical studies and factors for prevention. Indian J Ophthalmol 52:99–112
Schaumberg DA, Dana MR, Christen WG, Glynn RJ (1998) A systematic overview of the incidence of posterior capsular opacification. Ophthalmology 105:1213–1221
Toto L, Falconio G, Vecchiarino L, Scorcia V, Di Nicola M, Ballone E, Mastropasqua L (2007) Visual performance and biocompatibility of 2 multifocal diffractive IOLs: six-month comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1419–1425
Waheed K, Eleftheriadis H, Liu C (2001) Anterior capsular phimosis with a capsular tension ring. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1688–1690
Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2005) Intraocular lens factors that may affect anterior capsule contraction. Ophthalmology 112:286–292
Werner L, Pandy SK, Escobar-Gomez M, Visessook N, Peng Q, Apple DJ (2000) Anterior capsule opacification: a histopathological study comparing different IOL styles. Ophthalmology 107:463–467
Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1997) Reduction in the area of the anterior capsule opening after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 123:441–447
Sacu S, Menapace R, Buehl W, Rainer G, Findl O (2004) Effect of intraocular lens optic edge design and material on fibrotic capsule opacification and capsulorhexis contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1875–1882
Gallagher SP, Pavilack MA (1999) Risk factors for anterior capsule contraction syndrome with polypropylene or poly (methyl methacrylate) haptics. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1356–1361
Kramer S, Schröder AC, Brückner K, Jonescu-Cuypers C, Seitz B (2009) Subluxation of hydrophilic acrylate intraocular lenses due to massive capsular fibrosis. Ophthalmologe Sep 16 [Epub ahead of print]
Kugelberg M, Wejde G, Jayaram H, Zetterström C (2006) Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1627–1631
Zemaitiene R, Speckauskas M, Glebauskiene B, Jasinskas V (2008) Comparison of postoperative results after implantation of hydrophilic acrylic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: data of one-year prospective clinical study. Medicina (Kaunas) 44:936–943
Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Nepp J, Schild G (2002) Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1141–1152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any materials or methods described herein.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsinopoulos, I.T., Tsaousis, K.T., Kymionis, G.D. et al. Comparison of anterior capsule contraction between hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens models. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 1155–1158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1373-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1373-2