Abstract
Background
To assess anterior segment optical coherence tomographic measurements of patients after acute unilateral primary angle closure (APAC) compared with those of normal subjects.
Methods
The clinical observational study included 41 hospital-based patients after unilateral APAC, their unaffected contralateral eyes, and 205 subjects. These were selected from the population-based Beijing Eye Study, and were matched with the APAC group for age, gender, and refractive error. All study participants underwent slit-lamp adapted optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Results
Compared with the unaffected contralateral eyes, eyes with APAC had a significantly shallower anterior chamber (P < 0.001), smaller chamber angle (P < 0.001), shorter anterior chamber opening distance (P < 0.01), a more marked iris root curvature (P < 0.05), and a greater number of quadrants that were closed (P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, eyes with APAC and the unaffected contralateral eyes both showed more shallow anterior chambers (P < 0.001), smaller chamber angles (P < 0.001), shorter chamber opening distances in each quadrant (P < 0.001), and a greater number of quadrants that were closed (P < 0.001). The angle was most often closed in the nasal quadrant. In the APAC group, the anterior chamber angle was closed in three or more quadrants.
Conclusions
Anterior segment OCT measurements show significant differences between eyes with APAC, contralateral eyes at risk for APAC, and normal eyes. This may open possibilities for a semi-automatic assessment of subjects at risk for APAC by anterior segment OCT. The anterior chamber angle was closed most often in the nasal quadrant, and, in APAC, the angle was closed in three or more quadrants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Quigley HA (1996) Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80:389–393
Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, Ng TP, Devereux JG, Johnson GJ, Khaw PT, Seah SK (2000) The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1105–1111
Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ (1996) Glaucoma in Mongolia: a population-based survey in Hovsgol province, northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1235–1241
Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, Srinivas M, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN (2000) Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology 107:1710–1716
Bourne RR, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, Tantisevi V, Jitapunkul S, Lee PS, Johnson GJ, Rojanapongpun P (2003) Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao District, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol 87:1069–1074
He M, Foster PJ, Ge JHuang W, Zheng Y, Friedman DS, Lee PS, Khaw PT (2006) Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2782–2788
Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86:238–242
Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Jacob A (2003) Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol 87:450–454
Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Kumar RS (2003) Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:480–485
Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, Lee PS, Uranchimeg D, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J (2009) Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Opthalmol 84:186–192
Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S (1999) Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol 43:293–320
Xu L, Wang Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Jonas JB (2007) High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility. The Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 114:216–220
Xu L, Wang Y, Yang H, Jonas JB (2007) Differences in parapapillary atrophy between glaucomatous and normal eyes: the Beijing Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 144:541–546
Xu L, Cao WF, Wang YX, Chen CX, Jonas JB (2008) Anterior chamber depth and chamber angle and their associations with ocular and general parameters: the Beijing Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 145:929–936
Nolan WP, See JL, Chew PT, Friedman DS, Smith SD, Radhakrishnan S, Zheng C, Foster PJ, Aung T (2007) Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology 114:33–39
Friedman DS, Gazzard G, Foster P, Devereux J, Broman A, Quigley H, Tielsch J, Seah S (2003) Ultrasonographic biomicroscopy, Scheimpflug photography, and novel provocative tests in contralateral eyes of Chinese patients initially seen with acute angle closure. Arch Ophthalmol 121:633–642
Kunimatsu S, Tomidokoro A, Mishima K, Takamoto H, Tomita G, Iwase A, Araie M (2005) Prevalence of appositional angle closure determined by ultrasonic biomicroscopy in eyes with shallow anterior chambers. Ophthalmology 112:407–412
Lee JY, Kim YY, Jung HR (2006) Distribution and characteristics of peripheral anterior synechiae in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol 20:104–108
Lim MC, Lim LS, Gazzard G, Husain R, Chan YH, Seah SK, Aung T (2006) Lens opacity, thickness, and position in subjects with acute primary angle closure. J Glaucoma 15:260–263
Ramani KK, Mani B, Ronnie G, Joseph R, Lingam V (2007) Gender variation in ocular biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy of primary angle closure suspects and normal eyes. J Glaucoma 16:122–128
Sihota R, Ghate D, Mohan S, Gupta V, Pandey RM, Dada T (2008) Study of biometric parameters in family members of primary angle closure glaucoma patients. Eye 22:521–527
Wang N, Wu H, Fan Z (2002) Primary angle closure glaucoma in Chinese and Western populations. Chin Med J 115:1706–1715
He M, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Khaw PT (2006) Angle-closure glaucoma in East Asian and European people. Different diseases? Eye 20:3–12
Wang D, Pekmezci M, Basham RP, He M, Seider MI, Lin SC (2009) Comparison of different modes in optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in anterior chamber angle assessment. J Glaucoma 18:472–478
Wong HT, Chua JL, Sakata LM, Wong MH, Aung HT, Aung T (2009) Comparison of slitlamp optical coherence tomography and scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer to evaluate angle closure in Asian eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 127:599–603
Wong HT, Lim MC, Sakata LM, Aung HT, Amerasinghe N, Friedman DS, Aung T (2009) High-definition optical coherence tomography imaging of the iridocorneal angle of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 127:256–260
Amerasinghe N, Foster PJ, Wong TY, Htoon HM, He M, Shen SY, Aung HT, Saw SM, Aung T (2009) Variation of angle parameters in Asians: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study in a population of Singapore Malays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:2626–2631
Wang B, Congdon NG, Wang N, Lei K, Wang L, Aung T (2009) Dark room provocative test and extent of angle closure: An Anterior Segment OCT Study. J Glaucoma 2009 Jul 9 [Epub ahead of print]
Sakata LM, Wong TT, Wong HT, Kumar RS, Htoon HM, Aung HT, He M, Aung T (2009) Comparison of Visante and slit-lamp anterior segment optical coherence tomography in imaging the anterior chamber angle. Eye (Lond) 2009 Jun 12 [Epub ahead of print]
Mansouri K, Sommerhalder J, Shaarawy T (2009) Prospective comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anterior chamber dimensions in European eyes with primary angle closure. Eye (Lond) 2009 May 15 [Epub ahead of print]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funding / Support: Supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H.T., Xu, L., Cao, W.F. et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of acute primary angle closure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 825–831 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1291-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1291-3