Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure

  • Cornea
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) was demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of endothelial corneal diseases, a variable hyperopic shift has been measured as a common occurrence postoperatively. The aim of this work was to investigate the variance in the corneal and refractive responses to DSAEK combined with phacoemulsification and implantation of intra-ocular lens (IOL), namely the DSAEK triple procedure.

Methods

The refractive, topographic, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) data of 23 eyes treated with DSAEK triple procedure were analyzed. A mean refractive IOL target of –1.04 ± 0.09 D was calculated based on empirical data of our early experience to achieve emmetropia in all the eyes included in the study. Donor corneal parameters, i.e., graft diameter, thickness, and profile, were investigated in order to verify their possible role in the variable refractive shift after DSAEK.

Results

Although the 1-year mean refractive outcome was close to emmetropia (–0.01 ± 0.89 D), the average difference between the targeted postoperative refraction and the 1-year postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +0.98 ± 0.87 D. Correlations of refractive change with central graft thickness (r = 0.36, p = 0.05) and graft diameter (r = 0.45; p = 0.03) were statistically significant. AS-OCT analysis revealed how the graft shape, with graft thicker in the periphery compared with the center, contributed to reduce the radius of curvature of the posterior cornea, thus favoring the hyperopic shift postoperatively.

Conclusions

DSAEK triple procedure provides negligible changes in the surface topography, however with a variable amount of hyperopic shift postoperatively. Central graft thickness and graft profile together contributed to approximately two-thirds of the variance in refractive shift postoperatively. Lenticule diameter provided a minor influence on postoperative hyperopic shift than other graft parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melles GRJ (2006) Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 8:879–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorovoy MS (2006) Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 25:886–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Price MO, Price FW (2006) Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 113:1936–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr, Meisler DM (2007) Visual acuity, refractive error and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea 26:670–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, Slomovic A, Rootman D (2008) Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 115:1525–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ (2008) Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Six-months results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea 27:514–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Price MO, Baig KM, Brubaker JW, Price FW Jr (2008) Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 146:36–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Covert DJ, Koenig SB (2007) New triple procedure: Descemet’s stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 114:1272–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koenig SB, Covert DJ (2007) Early results of small-incision Descemet’s stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 114:221–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, Phillips PM, Hoar KL, Friend DJ (2008) Precut tissue in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Donor characteristics and early postoperative complications. Ophthalmology 115:497–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupps WJ, Qian Y, Meisler DM (2008) Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:578–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jun B, Kuo AN, Afshari NA, Carlson AN, Kim T (2009) Refractive change after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter. Cornea 28:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holz HA, Meyer JJ, Espandar L, Tabin GC, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M (2008) Corneal profile analysis after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and its relationship to postoperative hyperopic shift. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:211–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Deobhakta AA, Ide T, Manns F, Culbertson WW, O’Brien TP, Alfonso EC (2008) One-year results and anterior segment optical coherence tomography findings of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol 126:1052–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao SK, Leung CK, Cheung CY, Li EY, Cheng AC, Lam PT, Lam DSC (2008) Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: effect of the surgical procedure on corneal optics. Am J Ophthalmol 145:991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terry MA, Hoar KL, Wall J, Ousley P (2006) Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK). A laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea 25:926–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Friend DJ (2008) Endothelial keratoplasty. A simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 115:1179–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lombardo M, Lombardo G, Friend DJ, Serrao S, Terry MA (2009) Long-term anterior and posterior topographic analysis of the cornea following Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 28:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melles GRJ, Wijdh RHJ, Nieuwendaal CP (2004) A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (Descemetorhexis). Cornea 23:286–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Price MO, Price FW (2008) Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology 115:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ (2008) Endothelial cell loss after Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 115:488–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Shah AK, Hoar KL, Friend DJ (2009) Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs dystrophy with cataract. Complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 116:631–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Pascuale MA, Prasher P, Schlecte C, Arey M, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP, Mootha VV (2009) Corneal deturgescence after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty evaluated by Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 148:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith WJ (2000) The design of optical systems. Image formation (first-order optics). In: Modern optical engineering, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, USA, pp 32–41

  25. Terry MA, Saad HA, Shamie N, Shah AK (2009) Peripheral endothelial cell damage after trephination of donor tissue. Cornea 28:1149–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiel MA, Kaufmann C, Dedes W, Bochmann F, Becht CN, Schipper I (2009) Predictability of microkeratome-dependent flap thickness for DSAEK. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 226:230–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mehta JS, Shilbayeh R, Por YM, Cajucom-Uy H, Beuerman RW, Tan DT (2008) Femtosecond laser creation of donor cornea buttons for Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1970–1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ide T, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Leng T, Marini C, Stanciu NA, O’Brien TP. (2010). Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation with femtosecond laser and contact lens. Cornea 29: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Terry has a financial interest in the specialized instruments used in this surgery. The remaining authors have no financial or commercial interests in the materials presented herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Lombardo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lombardo, M., Terry, M.A., Lombardo, G. et al. Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 421–427 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1284-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1284-2

Keywords

Navigation