Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restricted post-trabeculectomy bleb formation by conjunctival scarring

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of radial conjunctival incision during fornix-based trabeculectomy, and conjunctival scarring associated with previous ocular surgeries, for the restriction of bleb formation.

Methods

Digital photo-slit lamp images of filtering blebs, which had undergone fornix-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin C previously, were analysed. The area and the height of the bleb in the conjunctivae with radial incision (Ain and Hin, respectively) were compared with the area and the height of the bleb in the conjunctivae without radial incision (Ano and Hno, respectively). We compared the parameters of bleb area (total bleb area, Ain and Ano) and bleb height (the bleb height at the centre of the scleral flap; Hc, Hin and Hno) in eyes without previous ocular surgeries, with those in eyes that underwent previous ocular surgeries.

Results

The study population consisted of 51 eyes. The Ano and the Hno were significantly larger than the Ain (p < 0.001) and the Hin (p < 0.001) respectively. Subgroup analyses in eyes without previous ocular surgeries and eyes with phacoemulsification cataract surgery also showed that the Ano was significantly larger than the Ain. However, there was no significant difference between the Ano and the Ain in eyes with previous trabeculectomy. A comparison of bleb formation between eyes without previous ocular surgeries and eyes with cataract surgery showed no significant differences in each of the bleb area and bleb height parameters. By contrast, the total bleb area (p = 0.021), the Ano (p = 0.017) and the Hc (p = 0.045) were significantly smaller in eyes with previous trabeculectomy than in eyes without previous ocular surgeries.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that bleb formation depends on radial conjunctival incision during fornix-based trabeculectomy and surgical conjunctival scarring from previous trabeculectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66:673–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson PG (1972) Surgery of the glaucomas. Br J Ophthalmol 56:299–306. doi:10.1136/bjo.56.3.299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luntz MH (1980) Trabeculectomy using a fornix-based conjunctival flap and tightly sutured scleral flap. Ophthalmology 87:985–989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poulsen EJ, Allingham RR (2000) Characteristics and risk factors of infections after glaucoma filtering surgery. J Glaucoma 9:438–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadway DC, Chang LP (2001) Trabeculectomy, risk factors for failure and the preoperative state of the conjunctiva. J Glaucoma 10:237–249. doi:10.1097/00061198-200106000-00017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson PG, Grierson I (1981) The place of trabeculectomy in the treatment of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 88:175–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller MH, Rice NS (1991) Trabeculectomy combined with beta irradiation for congenital glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 75:584–590. doi:10.1136/bjo.75.10.584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Broadway DC, Grierson I, Hitchings RA (1998) Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 125:805–818. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00045-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukuchi T, Ueda J, Yaoeda K, Suda K, Seki M, Abe H (2006) Comparison of fornix- and limbus-based conjunctival flaps in mitomycin C trabeculectomy with laser suture lysis in Japanese glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 50:338–344. doi:10.1007/s10384-005-0323-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmunds B, Bunce CV, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2004) Factors associated with success in first-time trabeculectomy for patients at low risk of failure with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 111:97–103. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grehn F, Hollo G, Khaw P, Overton B, Wilson R, Vogel R, Smith Z (2007) Factors affecting the outcome of trabeculectomy: an analysis based on combined data from two phase III studies of an antibody to transforming growth factor beta2, CAT-152. Ophthalmology 114:1831–1838. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells AP, Cordeiro MF, Bunce C, Khaw PT (2003) Cystic bleb formation and related complications in limbus- versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in pediatric and young adult trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 110:2192–2197. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00800-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Traverso CE, Tomey KF, Antonios S (1987) Limbal- vs fornix-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps. Am J Ophthalmol 104:28–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin YP, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS (2007) Surgical outcomes of traditional limbal-based versus fornix-based trabeculectomy with corneal valve. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 38:471–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agbeja AM, Dutton GN (1987) Conjunctival incisions for trabeculectomy and their relationship to the type of bleb formation—a preliminary study. Eye 1(Pt 6):738–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brincker P, Kessing SV (1992) Limbus-based versus fornix-based conjunctival flap in glaucoma filtering surgery. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 70:641–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. el Sayyad F, el-Rashood A, Helal M, Hisham M, el-Maghraby A (1999) Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival flaps in initial trabeculectomy with postoperative 5-fluorouracil: four-year follow-up findings. J Glaucoma 8:124–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman R, Thaller VT (2003) Bleb-limiting conjunctivoplasty for symptomatic circumferential trabeculectomy blebs. J Glaucoma 12:272–274. doi:10.1097/00061198-200306000-00016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D, Swamynathan K, Cortes A (2003) Morphologic classification of filtering blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. J Glaucoma 12:266–271. doi:10.1097/00061198-200306000-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wells AP, Ashraff NN, Hall RC, Purdie G (2006) Comparison of two clinical Bleb grading systems. Ophthalmology 113:77–83. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wells AP, James K, Birchall W, Wong T (2007) Information loss in 2 bleb grading systems. J Glaucoma 16:246–250. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180300801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gross RL, Feldman RM, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC, Spiegel D, Katz LJ, Wilson RP, Varma R, Moster MR, Marks S (1988) Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology 95:1195–1201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kosmin AS, Wishart PK, Ridges PJ (1998) Long-term intraocular pressure control after cataract extraction with trabeculectomy: phacoemulsification versus extracapsular technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:249–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.

Statement of conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Inatani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwao, K., Inatani, M., Ogata-Iwao, M. et al. Restricted post-trabeculectomy bleb formation by conjunctival scarring. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247, 1095–1101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1051-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1051-4

Keywords

Navigation