Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peeling of internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy for complicated retinal detachment prevents epimacular membrane formation

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To investigate the clinical benefit of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling at the macula for the prevention of epimacular membrane formation following vitreous surgery using silicone oil for the treatment of complicated retinal detachment.

Methods

This was a non-randomized, retrospective, interventional study of a case series. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively for 20 consecutively recruited patients who underwent successful primary vitrectomy with ILM peeling at the macula using silicone oil (group 1) and 22 consecutively recruited patients who underwent successful primary vitrectomy using silicone oil without ILM peeling at the macula for complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (group 2). The main outcome measures were distant visual acuity and epimacular membrane formation. The data were analyzed and compared using Fisher’s Exact test, Pearson Chi-square test, independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and a repeated ANOVA.

Results

The mean age of patients was 52.7 ± 12.6 years in group 1 and 53.2 ± 13.3 years in group 2 (p = 0.89). The mean follow-up time was 24.6 ± 7.6 weeks in group 1 and 34.1 ± 12.6 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.01). Preoperatively, ten eyes in group 1 and 10 eyes in group 2 were pseudophakic; the macula was detached in all cases. Silicone oil had been removed from all eyes of both groups at least 3 months before the final examination. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to sex (p = 0.44), mean duration of retinal detachment (p = 0.12), mean preoperative visual acuity (logMAR), mean number of retinal breaks (p = 0.43), and grade of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (p = 0.35). The final visual acuity (logMAR) was 0.60 ± 0.30 in group 1 and 0.72 ± 0.35 in group 2 (p = 0.49). Four eyes in group 1 and two eyes in group 2 underwent cataract surgery during silicone oil removal. Epimacular membrane formation was observed in two eyes before silicone oil removal and in four eyes within 8 weeks after silicone oil removal in group 2. No epimacular membrane formation was seen in group 1 (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

ILM peeling at the macula during vitreous surgery with silicone oil for the treatment of complicated retinal detachment may prevent epimacular membrane formation without negatively affecting distant visual acuity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pournaras CJ, Donati G, Brazitikos PD, Kapetanios AD, Dereklis DL, Stangos NT (2000) Macular epiretinal membranes. Semin Ophthalmol 15:100–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox MS, Azen SP, Barr C, Linton KL, Didie KR, Lai MY, Freeman HM, Irvine A (1995) Macular pucker after successful surgery for proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Silicone Study Reports 8. Ophthalmology 102:1884–1891

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiss CG, Richter-Müksch S, Sacu S, Benesch T, Velikay-Parel M (2007) Anatomy and function of the macula after surgery for retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 144:872–877, doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks HL Jr (2000) Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 107:1939–1949, doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00331-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumagai K, Furukawa M, Ogino N, Uemura A, Larson E (2006) Long-term outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green in macular hole surgery. Retina 26:613–617, doi:10.1097/00006982-200607000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel JI, Hykin PG, Schadt M, Luong V, Fitzke F, Gregor ZJ (2006) Pars plana vitrectomy with or without peeling of the inner limiting membrane for diabetic macular edema. Retina 26:5–13, doi:10.1097/00006982-200601000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwok AK, Lai TY, Yuen KS (2005) Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 33:379–385, doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01015.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wickham LJ, Asaria RH, Alexander R, Alexander R, Luthert P, Charteris DG (2007) Immunopathology of ıntraocular silicone oil:retina and epiretinal membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 91:258–262, doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Asaria RHY, Kon CH, Bunce C, Sethi S, Limb GA, Khaw PT, Alyward GV, Charteris DG (2004) Silicone oil concentrates fibrogenic growth factors in the retro-oil fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1439–1442, doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.040402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cengiz Aras.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicting interests in the subject matter presented.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aras, C., Arici, C., Akar, S. et al. Peeling of internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy for complicated retinal detachment prevents epimacular membrane formation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247, 619–623 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1025-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1025-y

Keywords

Navigation