Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The evaluation of the treatment response in obstructive meibomian gland disease by in vivo laser confocal microscopy

  • Cornea
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the status of periglandular inflammation, ocular surface and tear function alterations in patients with obstructive meibomian gland disease (OMGD) by in vivo confocal microscopy before and after anti-inflammatory treatment, and to compare the results with patients receiving only topical non-preserved artificial tears and sodium hyaluronate eye drops without anti-inflammatory agents.

Methods

Thirty-two eyes of 16 OMGD patients receiving anti-inflammatory treatment (treatment group) and 22 eyes of 11 OMGD patients receiving only topical non-preserved artificial tears and sodium hyaluronate eye drops (control group) were recruited in this prospective study. All subjects underwent slit-lamp examinations, tear film break-up time (BUT) measurements, fluorescein and Rose-Bengal stainings, Schirmer test І without anesthesia, transillumination of the lids (meibography), and in vivo laser confocal microscopy of the lids (HRTII-RCM).

Results

The mean BUT, fluorescein staining scores, and inflammatory cell densities observed by in vivo confocal microscopy improved significantly in the group receiving anti-inflammatory treatment (p < 0.05), whereas no significant alterations of these parameters were observed in the group not receiving anti-inflammatory agents (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In vivo confocal microscopy was able to effectively demonstrate the treatment responses in patients with OMGD. Inflammatory cell density calculation seems to be a promising new parameter of in vivo confocal microscopy in the evaluation of treatment responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCulley JP, Shine WE (2003) Meibomian gland function and the tear lipid layer. Ocul Surf 1:97–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hom MM, Martinson JR, Knapp LL et al (1990) Prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci 67:710–712. doi:10.1097/00006324-199009000-00010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Molinari JF, Stanek S (2000) Meibomian gland status comparison between active duty personnel and U.S. veterans. Mil Med 165:591–593

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paranjpe DR, Foulks GN (2003) Therapy for meibomian gland disease. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16:37–42. doi:10.1016/S0896-1549(02)00106-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shine WE, McCulley JP, Pandya AG (2003) Minocycline effect on meibomian gland lipids in meibomianitis patients. Exp Eye Res 76:417–420. doi:10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00005-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Foulks GN, Bron AJ (2003) Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical schema for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf 1:107–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robin JB, Jester J, Nobe J et al (1985) In vivo transillumination biomicroscopy and photography of meibomian gland dysfunction. A clinical study. Ophthalmology 92:1423–1426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman SC, Musch DC, Belin MW et al (2004) Confocal microscopy. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 111:396–406. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K (2006) In vivo laser confocal microscopy of Bowman’s layer of the cornea. Ophthalmology 113:2203–2208. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Babu K, Murthy KR (2007) Combined fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis by in vivo confocal microscopy. Eye 21:271–272. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Sato EA et al (2007) The application of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in the management of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Mol Vis 13:1319–1326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi A, Yoshita T, Sugiyama K (2005) In vivo findings of the bulbar/palpebral conjunctiva and presumed meibomian glands by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Cornea 24:985–988. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000160976.88824.2b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Messmer EM, Torres SE, Mackert MI et al (2005) In vivo confocal microscopy in blepharitis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:894–900. doi:10.1055/s-2005-858798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Nicola R, Labbe A, Amar N et al (2005) In vivo confocal microscopy and ocular surface disease: anatomical-clinical correlations. J Fr Ophtalmol 28:691–698. doi:10.1016/S0181-5512(05)80980-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toda I, Tsubota K (1993) Practical double vital staining for ocular surface evaluation. Cornea 12:366–367. doi:10.1097/00003226-199307000-00015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimazaki J, Goto E, Ono M et al (1998) Meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjögren syndrome. Ophthalmology 105:1485–1488. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98033-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimazaki J, Sakata M, Tsubota K (1995) Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Arch Ophthalmol 113:1266–1270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Norn M (1987) Expressibility of meibomian secretion. Relation to age, lid precorneal film, scales, foam, hair and pigmentation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 65:137–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Den S, Shimizu K, Ikeda T et al (2006) Association between meibomian gland changes and aging, sex, or tear function. Cornea 25:651–655. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000227889.11500.6f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCulley JP, Dougherty JM, Deneau DG (1982) Classification of chronic blepharitis. Ophthalmology 89:1173–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCulley JP, Sciallis GF (1977) Meibomian keratoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 84:788–793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo SE, Lee DC, Chang MH (2005) The effect of low dose doxycycline therapy in chronic meibomian gland dysfunction. Korean J Ophthalmol 19:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dougherty JM, McCulley JP, Silvany RE, Meyer DR (1991) The role of tetracycline in chronic blepharitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 11:2970–2975

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aronowicz JD, Shine WE, Oral D, Vargas JM, McCulley JP (2006) Short term oral minocycline treatment of meibomianitis. Br J Ophthalmol 90:856–860. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.091579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baudouin C, Nordmann JP, Denis P, Creuzot-Garcher C, Allaire C, Trinquand C (2002) Efficacy of indomethacin 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% on conjunctival inflammation following chronic application of antiglaucomatous drugs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:929–935. doi:10.1007/s00417-002-0581-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dougherty JM, McCulley JP (1984) Comparative bacteriology of chronic blepharitis. Br J Ophthalmol 68:524–528. doi:10.1136/bjo.68.8.524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCulley JP, Dougherty JM (1986) Bacterial aspects of chronic blepharitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 27:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Paiva CS, Corrales RM, Villarreal AL, Farley W, Li DQ, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC (2006) Apical corneal barrier disruption in experimental murine dry eye is abrogated by methylprednisolone and doxycycline. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2847–2856. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Messmer EM, Torres SE, Mackert MI, Zapp DM, Kampik A (2005) Konfokale in-vivo Mikroskopie bei Blepharitis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:894–900. doi:10.1055/s-2005-858798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu Y, Adan ES, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Fukagawa K, Takano Y, Tsubota K, Fujishima H (2007) Conjunctival in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Mol Vis 13:1379–1389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the products mentioned in this paper. Presented at the 32nd Japan Cornea Conference, 28 February-1 March 2008, Urayasu, Japan. This work was supported in part by research grants from J&J Vision Care Company. Yukihiro Matsumoto and Yuta Shigeno contributed equally to the work and request acknowledgement of double first authorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Dogru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsumoto, Y., Shigeno, Y., Sato, E.A. et al. The evaluation of the treatment response in obstructive meibomian gland disease by in vivo laser confocal microscopy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247, 821–829 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1017-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1017-y

Keywords

Navigation