Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognosis of penetrating eye injuries with posterior segment intraocular foreign body

  • Medical Ophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the prognostic factors concerning the anatomy and visual acuity of eyes subject to trauma related posterior intraocular foreign body.

Patients and methods

The records of 28 eyes of 27 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular foreign body removal during a 5 year period were retrospectively reviewed. Ocular trauma score was calculated for each eye.

Results

The most common initial findings were corneal wound (68%), lens injury (50%), retinal lesion (50%), vitreous hemorrhage (25%), and endophthalmitis (14%). Multiple foreign body causing perforating injury with retained posterior segment foreign body occurred in 7% of the cases. The foreign body was found on the surface of the retina in 39% of the cases. Postoperative complications were retinal detachment (46%), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (25%), and phthysis (4%). No eye was enucleated and 1 eye (4%) lost light perception. The final best corrected visual acuity became better or equal to 0.5 Snellen E in 34% of the eyes. The mean follow-up was 19 months (1.5–60 months).

Conclusions

Prognosis was significantly worse in cases with lower trauma score, initial visual acuity less than 0.1 Snellen E, large foreign body, upset of bacterial endophthalmitis, and with proliferative vitreo-retinopathy. Visual outcomes in our cases were better than estimated follow-up visual acuity based on ocular trauma score parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuhn F, Morris R, Mester V, Witherspoon CD, Mann L, Maisiak R (2002) Epidemiology and socioeconomics. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15:145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn F, Mester V, Berta A, Morris R (1998) Epidemiology of severe eye injuries. United States Eye Injury Registry (USEIR) and Hungarian Eye Injury Registry (HEIR). Ophthalmologe 95:332–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H (1988) Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology 95:911–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hildebrand H (1996) Sixty-six magnet operations with successful extraction of particles of iron from the inferior of the eye in fifty-three cases. Arch Ophthalmol 114:762–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazokoglu H, Saatci O (1990) Intraocular foreign bodies: results of 27 cases. Ann Ophthalmol 22:373–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mester V, Kuhn F (1998) Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies retained in the posterior segment: management options and results. Int Ophthalmol 22:355–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mieler WF, Ellis MK, Williams DF, Han DP (1990) Retained intraocular foreign bodies and endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 97:1532–1538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD (2002) The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15:163–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G (1996) A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlovic S, Schmidt KG, Tomic Z, Dzinic M (1998) Management of intra-ocular foreign bodies impacting or embedded in the retina. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 26:241–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt JG, Mansfeld-Nies R, Nies C (1987) On the recovery of the electroretinogram after removal of intravitreal copper particles. Doc Ophthalmol 65:135–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tawara A (1986) Transformation and cytotoxicity of iron in siderosis bulbi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:226–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Micovic V, Milenkovic S, Opric M (1990) Acute aseptic panophthalmitis caused by a copper foreign body. Fortschr Ophthalmol 87:362–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duke-Elder S (1972) System of ophthalmology. Henry Kimpton, London, pp 451–649

  15. Kuhn F (2002) Intraocular foreign bodies. In: Pieramici DJ (ed) Ocular trauma: principles and practice. Thieme, New York Stuttgart, pp 235–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zsuzsanna Szijártó.

Additional information

None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned in the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szijártó, Z., Gaál, V., Kovács, B. et al. Prognosis of penetrating eye injuries with posterior segment intraocular foreign body. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246, 161–165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0650-1

Keywords

Navigation