Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histological and immunohistochemical characterisation of conjunctival graft vs host disease following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conjunctival graft vs host disease (cnGvHD) is a complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in most cases as part of systemic GvHD. Diagnostic biopsies are commonly collected from bulbar conjunctiva only. The aims of our study were to evaluate whether additional biopsies from the tarsal conjunctiva increase sensitivity upon histopathologic evaluation and to investigate the staining profile for common immunohistochemical markers in cnGvHD. We additionally propose an adaptive histological classification for cnGvHD analogous to Lerner’s GvHD skin classification for predicting patient survival.

Methods

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded conjunctival specimens from 23 post-mortem control eyes and 42 patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE), periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain and with antibodies against CD1a, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD45RO, CD68, Fas ligand, TIA-1, HLA-DRα by means of immunohistochemistry. Cell counting took place in ten representative fields at 64.4 μm (length) × 21.2 μm (width). Multifactorial analysis of variance was performed to assess any influence of cnGvHD on the staining pattern for the immunohistochemical markers. Survival times were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

All 42 specimens and none of the controls were diagnosed as cnGvHD. The bulbar specimens were staged according to the modified Lerner classification: grade (G) I: 0; G II: 17 (tarsal with G≤II, 2; G>II, 8); G III: 12 (tarsal with G≤III: 2; G>III: 1); G IV: 12 (tarsal with G≤IV: 6); G V: 1. The number of pairs with either the tarsal or bulbar counterpart being more severely affected was almost equal (10 vs 9). A tendency towards shorter survival in advanced bulbar cnGvHD was demonstrated (G III–V vs G I–II, p =0.06). Staining for the immunohistochemical markers in cnGvHD differed significantly from that in controls (p<0.01). Proposed markers for cnGvHD (e = epithelium, s = stroma; mean cell counts ± SD; cnGvHD vs controls) are: CD8 s (15.7 ± 18.4 vs 6 ± 5.6), CD25 s (2.6 ± 2.8 vs 0.7 ± 1.6), CD68 s (8 ± 9 vs 3.9 ± 3.5) at the bulbar site and CD1a e (1.2 ± 1.6 vs 0.3 ± 0.6) and TIA-1 e (2.2 ± 2.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.3) at the tarsal site.

Conclusions

Additional tarsal biopsy does not seem to add relevant diagnostic sensitivity for cnGvHD when the modified Lerner classification is applied. The modified Lerner classification of the bulbar cnGvHD seems to be of prognostic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appelbaum FR (2001) Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy. Nature 411:385–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernauer W, Wright P, Dart JK, Leonard JN, Lightman S (1993) The conjunctiva in acute and chronic mucous membrane pemphigoid. An immunohistochemical analysis. Ophthalmology 100:339–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhan AK, Fujikawa LS, Foster CS (1982) T-cell subsets and Langerhans cells in normal and diseased conjunctiva. Am J Ophthalmol 94:205–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boozalis GT, Pepose JS, Jabs DA et al (1987) Immunocytologic studies of the conjunctiva in graft versus host disease. Ophthalmology 94:136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond DJ, Chang KL, Jenkins KA, Forman SJ (1995) Immunohistochemical analysis of T cell phenotypes in patients with graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 59:1436–1444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirst LW, Jabs DA, Tutschka PJ, Green, WR, Santos GW (1983) The eye in bone marrow transplantation. I. Clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol 101:580–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jabs DA, Wingard J, Green WR, Farmer ER, Vogelsang G, Saral R (1989) The eye in bone marrow transplantation. III. Conjunctival graft-vs-host disease. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1343–1348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lerner KG, Kao GF, Storb R, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Thomas ED (1974) Histopathology of graft-vs-host reaction (GvHR) in human recipients of marrow from HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplant Proc 6:367–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittelviefhaus H, Auw-Haedrich C (2003) Corneal complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ophthalmologe 100:222–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montan PG, Biberfeld PJ, Scheynius A (1995) IgE, IgE receptors, and other immunocytochemical markers in atopic and nonatopic patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 102:725–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patey-Mariaud de Serre N, Reijasse D, Verkarre V, Canioni D, Colomb V, Haddad E, Brousse N (2002) Chronic intestinal graft-versus-host disease: clinical, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of 17 children. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rojas B, Cuhna R, Zafirakis P, Ramirez JM, Lizan-garciia M, Zhao T, Foster CS (2005) Cell populations and adhesion molecules expression in conjunctiva before and after bone marrow transplantation. Exp Eye Res 81:313–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogelsang GB (1993) Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Curr Opin Oncol 5:276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. West RH, Szer J, Pedersen JS (1991) Ocular surface and lacrimal disturbances in chronic graft-versus-host disease: the role of conjunctival biopsy. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 19:187–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Renate Buchen and Gabriele Korth for their technical assistance, Prof. Dr. A. Schmitt-Gräff, Irmgard Matt, PD Dr. H. Bertz, Dr. A. Mumm, Dr. G. Ledderose and Dr. E. Messmer for providing patients’ clinical data, Melanie Schlosshauer for typing parts of the manuscript and Carole Cürten for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Auw-Haedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auw-Haedrich, C., Potsch, C., Böhringer, D. et al. Histological and immunohistochemical characterisation of conjunctival graft vs host disease following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 1001–1007 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0448-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0448-6

Keywords

Navigation