Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of the Retinal Thickness Analyser: differentiation between normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma or macular pathologies

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Retinal Thickness Analyser (RTA) is intended to detect glaucomatous changes as well as macular pathologies at the posterior pole. We determined the diagnostic accuracy for eyes with manifest glaucoma or macular diseases.

Methods

We examined 71 eyes with long-term, established eye conditions. Included were 28 eyes with glaucoma, 21 with different macular diseases and 22 normal eyes. All examinations were evaluated in a blind-test by RTA experts without any clinical information on the patients. After comparison of the RTA interpretation with the clinical diagnosis, we determined sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

Results

Of 71 examinations, 15 (21%) were not interpretable. If these results are excluded, the following diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for glaucoma and macular disorders respectively: sensitivity 75 and 59%, specificity 55 and 97%, positive predictive value 48 and 90% and negative predictive value 80 and 84%. These values were not significantly different when both eyes of each patient were included in the final analysis (n=133).

Conclusion

The diagnostic values of the RTA determined in this case control study were not satisfactory. However, no clinical information was used in the assessment. The extent to which additional clinical information increases the diagnostic value remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–f

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brusini P, Tosoni C, Miani F (2000) Quantitative mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole in chronic open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 232:42–44

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coker JG, Duker JS (1996) Macular disease and optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 7:33–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL, Caprioli J (2002) Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:140–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan K, Hudson C, Flanagan JG (2004) Comparison of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Retinal Thickness Analyzer in the assessment of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:610–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kocur I, Resnikoff S (2002) Visual impairment and blindness in Europe and their prevention. Br J Ophthalmol 86:716–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Konno S, Takeda M, Yanagiya N, Akiba J, Yoshida A (2001) Three-dimensional analysis of macular diseases with a scanning retinal thickness analyzer and a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalm Surg Lasers 32:95–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Montero JA, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2004) Macular thickness in patients with choroidal neovascularization determined by RTA and OCT3: comparative results. Eye 19(1):72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neubauer AS, Priglinger S, Ullrich S, Bechmann M, Thiel MJ, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2001) Comparison of foveal thickness measured with the retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography. Retina 21:596–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pires I, Bernardes RC, Lobo CL, Soares MA, Cunha-Vaz JG (2002) Retinal thickness in eyes with mild nonproliferative retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison of measurements obtained by retinal thickness analysis and optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1301–1306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez-Galeana C, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, Gokhale PA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN (2001) Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology 108:1812–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strom C, Sander B (2004) Comparison of objective retinal thickness analysis and subjective stereo fundus photography in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1450–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanito M, Itai N, Ohira A, Chihara E (2004) Reduction of posterior pole retinal thickness in glaucoma detected using the Retinal Thickness Analyzer. Ophthalmology 111:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsujikawa A, Kiryu J, Dong J, Yasukawa T, Suzuma I, Takagi H, Ogura Y (1999) Quantitative analysis of diabetic macular edema after scatter laser photocoagulation with the scanning retinal thickness analyzer. Retina 19:59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinberger D, Axer-Siegel R, Landau D, Yassur Y (1998) Retinal thickness variation in the diabetic patient measured by the retinal thickness analyser. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1003–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Z, Du S (2000) Measurement of human retinal thickness at posterior pole with retinal thickness analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 36:124–128, 11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yasukawa T, Kiryu J, Tsujikawa A, Dong J, Suzuma I, Takagi H, Ogura Y (1998) Quantitative analysis of foveal retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy with the scanning retinal thickness analyzer. Retina 18:150–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, Sanchez-Galeana CA, Vasile C, Weinreb RN (2001) Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 119:985–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Maier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maier, P., Funk, J. Diagnostic accuracy of the Retinal Thickness Analyser: differentiation between normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma or macular pathologies. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 1113–1118 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0288-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0288-4

Keywords

Navigation