Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of a small incision, sutureless vitrectomy in the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM) compared with a standard 20-gauge vitrectomy system.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients with idiopathic ERM were recruited for this study and prospectively evaluated. In group 1 (n=26) we used a transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy system (TSV), patients in group 2 (n=20) were operated on using a standard 20-gauge vitrectomy system. The ERM was removed and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was peeled in all eyes. Surgery-related complications, operating time, intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) consumption, postoperative discomfort, postoperative intraocular inflammation, lens opacification, and long-term visual outcome are reported and compared.

Results

No surgery-related complications were observed in either group. Operating time was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (mean 15.6 and 29.6 min respectively). Intraoperative amount of BSS consumption was less in group 1 (mean 28 ml in group 1 and 42 ml in group 2). Postoperative discomfort and intraocular inflammation were significantly reduced in the 25-gauge group. In the 20-gauge group cataract formation requiring surgery was observed in two eyes. Visual acuity improved significantly in both groups. The 25-gauge group improved on average by more lines of vision and the improvement in vision was more rapid.

Conclusion

The TSV system is a safe and efficient surgical technique for ERM surgery. Operating time is significantly reduced, minimizing surgery-induced trauma, and reducing postoperative intraocular inflammation and the patients’ discomfort. The incidence of cataract formation may be less using TSV. Postoperative recovery is accelerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barraquer RI, Alvarez de Toledo JP, Montané D, Escoto RM, Garcia Torres C, Bennani-Tazzi M (1998) Fixed-dose combination of 0.1% diclofenac plus 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution for inflammation after cataract surgery: a randomized, comparative, active treatment-controlled trial. Eur J Ophthalmol 8:173–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalam KV, Malkani S, Shah VA (2003) Intravitreal dexamethasone effectively reduces postoperative inflammation after vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 34:188–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JC (1996) Sutureless pars plana vitrectomy through self-sealing sclerotomies. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1273–1275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherfan GM, Michles RG, de Bustros S, Enger C, Glaser BM (1991) Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 111:434–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho YJ, Lee JM, Kim SS (2004) Vitreoretinal surgery using transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Yonsei Med J 45:615–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY (1993) The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The longitudinal study of the cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, Enger C, Rice TA, Glaser BM (1988) Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 105:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, Rice TA, Glaser BM (1988) Vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Br J Ophthalmol 72:692–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Ng E, Barnes A, Wu SL, Drew N, Sommerville BS (2002) A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1807–1813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, Chang TS, Pieramici DJ, Barnes A, Kent D (2002) Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1814–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsuan JD, Brown NA, Bron AJ, Patel CK, Rosen PH (2001) Posterior subcapsular and nuclear cataract after vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:437–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Margherio RR, Cox MS Jr, Trese MT, Murphy PL, Johnson J, Minor LA (1985) Removal of epimacular membranes. Ophthalmology 92:1075–1083

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald HR, Verre WP, Aaberg TM (1986) Surgical management of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 93:978–983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michels RG (1984) Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology 91:1384–1388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Milibak T, Suveges I (1998) Complications of sutureless pars plana vitrectomy through self-sealing sclerotomies. Arch Ophthalmol 116:119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogura Y, Takanashi T, Ishigooka H, Ogino N (1991) Quantitative analysis of lens changes after vitrectomy by fluorophotometry. Am J Ophthalmol 111:179–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, Blaisdell J (2003) Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology 110:62–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman R, Rosen PH, Riddell C, Towler H (2000) Self-sealing sclerotomies for sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 31:462–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito Y, Lewis JM, Park I, Ikuno Y, Hayashi A, Ohji M, Tano Y (1999) Nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery: a strategy to prevent postoperative nuclear sclerosis. Ophthalmology 106:1541–1545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawa M, Saito Y, Hayashi A, Kusaka S, Ohji M, Tano Y (2001) Assessment of nuclear sclerosis after nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 132:356–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thelen T, Verbeek AM, Tilanus MA, van den Biesen PR (2003) A novel technique for self-sealing, wedge-shaped pars plana sclerotomies and its features in ultrasound biomicroscopy and clinical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 136:1085–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willis AW (1989) Surgical treatment of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane. Ophtalmologie 3:29–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislao Rizzo.

Additional information

The authors have no financial interests related to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizzo, S., Genovesi-Ebert, F., Murri, S. et al. 25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 472–479 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0173-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0173-6

Keywords

Navigation