Abstract
Purpose
To study the discriminatory ability of dacryoscintigraphy in differentiating between patients with epiphora and volunteers using a simple method.
Methods
Twenty eyes in ten volunteers and 66 eyes in 55 patients with severe epiphora were studied. Dacryoscintigraphy (15 frames of 1 min) was performed after administration of 4 MBq 99mTc-pertechnetate (10 μl) in both eyes. By mapping a single region of interest (ROI) over the conjunctival sac we determined T1 (%dose in first minute) and linear clearance rate (LCR, defined as \(100\% {\left( {T1 - T15} \right)}/T1\) from the tracer disappearance curve. Reproducibility was determined in volunteers. Conjunctival resorption was determined from completely obstructed systems. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted.
Results
In volunteers mean T1 was 52.8±11.9% (95% CI 47.1–58.4%), and LCR was 74.2±11.1% (95% CI 69.0–79.4%). Reproducibility was good (mean difference 4.1±13.3% for T1 and 0.7±17% for LCR). Epiphora patients had clearly higher T1 (82.1±15.2%, P<0.0001) and lower LCR (38.9±22.5%, P<0.0001) values. Tracer resorption was 24%. Based on ROC analysis 70% for T1 and 50% for LCR were considered optimal cut-off levels to separate patients from volunteers. Sensitivity/specificity were 77/95% for T1 and 71/100% for LCR. T1 and LCR values did not correlate with symptom scores or Anel test results.
Conclusion
Dacryoscintigraphy, using LCR and T1 as parameters, is a reliable and objective method to detect tear-flow abnormalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amanat LA, Wraight EP, Watson PG, Hawkins TD (1979) Role of lacrimal scintigraphy and subtraction macrodacryocystography in the management of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 63:511–519
Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. II. Its role in the diagnosis of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 67:720–728
Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. III. Physiological aspects of lacrimal drainage. Br J Ophthalmol 67:729–732
Chavis RM, Welham RA, Maisey MN (1978) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. Arch Ophthalmol 96:2066–2068
Conway ST (1994) Evaluation and management of “functional” nasolacrimal blockage: results of a survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:185–188
von Denffer H, Dressler J, Pabst HW (1984) Lacrimal dacryoscintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med 14:8–15
Hanna IT, MacEwen CJ, Kennedy N (1992) Lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of epiphora. Nucl Med Commun 13:416–420
Hilditch TE, Kwok CS, Amanat LA (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. I. Compartmental analysis of data. Br J Ophthalmol 67:713–719
Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. I. Method and physiological application. Br J Ophthalmol 59:308–312
Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. II. Lacrimal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 59:313–322
Munk PL, Lin DTC, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690
Nixon J, Birchall IW, Virjee J (1990) The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Br J Radiol 63:337–339
O’Donnell B, Shah R (2001) Dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora in the presence of a patent lacrimal system. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29:27–29
Rose JD, Clayton CB (1985) Scintigraphy and contrast radiography for epiphora. Br J Radiol 58:1183–1186
Rossomondo RM, Carlton WH, Trueblood JH, Thomas RP (1972) A new method of evaluating lacrimal drainage. Arch Ophthalmol 88:523–525
Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1977) Methodological aspects of tear flow determination by means of a radioactive tracer. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55:726–738
Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1979) Tear flow in normal human eyes. Determination by means of radioisotope and gamma camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:564–581
Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE (1999) Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1032–1035
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jager, P.L., Mansour, K., Vrakkink-de Zoete, H. et al. Clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy using a simplified analysis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 243, 1134–1140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1038-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1038-0