Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy using a simplified analysis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the discriminatory ability of dacryoscintigraphy in differentiating between patients with epiphora and volunteers using a simple method.

Methods

Twenty eyes in ten volunteers and 66 eyes in 55 patients with severe epiphora were studied. Dacryoscintigraphy (15 frames of 1 min) was performed after administration of 4 MBq 99mTc-pertechnetate (10 μl) in both eyes. By mapping a single region of interest (ROI) over the conjunctival sac we determined T1 (%dose in first minute) and linear clearance rate (LCR, defined as \(100\% {\left( {T1 - T15} \right)}/T1\) from the tracer disappearance curve. Reproducibility was determined in volunteers. Conjunctival resorption was determined from completely obstructed systems. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted.

Results

In volunteers mean T1 was 52.8±11.9% (95% CI 47.1–58.4%), and LCR was 74.2±11.1% (95% CI 69.0–79.4%). Reproducibility was good (mean difference 4.1±13.3% for T1 and 0.7±17% for LCR). Epiphora patients had clearly higher T1 (82.1±15.2%, P<0.0001) and lower LCR (38.9±22.5%, P<0.0001) values. Tracer resorption was 24%. Based on ROC analysis 70% for T1 and 50% for LCR were considered optimal cut-off levels to separate patients from volunteers. Sensitivity/specificity were 77/95% for T1 and 71/100% for LCR. T1 and LCR values did not correlate with symptom scores or Anel test results.

Conclusion

Dacryoscintigraphy, using LCR and T1 as parameters, is a reliable and objective method to detect tear-flow abnormalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amanat LA, Wraight EP, Watson PG, Hawkins TD (1979) Role of lacrimal scintigraphy and subtraction macrodacryocystography in the management of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 63:511–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. II. Its role in the diagnosis of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 67:720–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. III. Physiological aspects of lacrimal drainage. Br J Ophthalmol 67:729–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chavis RM, Welham RA, Maisey MN (1978) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. Arch Ophthalmol 96:2066–2068

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Conway ST (1994) Evaluation and management of “functional” nasolacrimal blockage: results of a survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:185–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. von Denffer H, Dressler J, Pabst HW (1984) Lacrimal dacryoscintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med 14:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna IT, MacEwen CJ, Kennedy N (1992) Lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of epiphora. Nucl Med Commun 13:416–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hilditch TE, Kwok CS, Amanat LA (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. I. Compartmental analysis of data. Br J Ophthalmol 67:713–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. I. Method and physiological application. Br J Ophthalmol 59:308–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. II. Lacrimal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 59:313–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Munk PL, Lin DTC, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nixon J, Birchall IW, Virjee J (1990) The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Br J Radiol 63:337–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Donnell B, Shah R (2001) Dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora in the presence of a patent lacrimal system. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29:27–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose JD, Clayton CB (1985) Scintigraphy and contrast radiography for epiphora. Br J Radiol 58:1183–1186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossomondo RM, Carlton WH, Trueblood JH, Thomas RP (1972) A new method of evaluating lacrimal drainage. Arch Ophthalmol 88:523–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1977) Methodological aspects of tear flow determination by means of a radioactive tracer. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55:726–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1979) Tear flow in normal human eyes. Determination by means of radioisotope and gamma camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:564–581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE (1999) Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1032–1035

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. L. Jager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jager, P.L., Mansour, K., Vrakkink-de Zoete, H. et al. Clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy using a simplified analysis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 243, 1134–1140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1038-0

Keywords

Navigation